These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23972222)
21. Semantics does not need a processing license from syntax in reading Chinese. Zhang Y; Yu J; Boland JE J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2010 May; 36(3):765-81. PubMed ID: 20438271 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Syntactic and semantic processing of Chinese middle sentences: evidence from event-related potentials. Zeng T; Mao W; Lu Q Neuroreport; 2016 May; 27(8):568-73. PubMed ID: 27028353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of emotional words on sentence processing: electrophysiological and behavioral evidence. Martín-Loeches M; Fernández A; Schacht A; Sommer W; Casado P; Jiménez-Ortega L; Fondevila S Neuropsychologia; 2012 Dec; 50(14):3262-72. PubMed ID: 22982604 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Semantics prevalence over syntax during sentence processing: a brain potential study of noun-adjective agreement in Spanish. Martín-Loeches M; Nigbur R; Casado P; Hohlfeld A; Sommer W Brain Res; 2006 Jun; 1093(1):178-89. PubMed ID: 16678138 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. An Event-related Potential Study of Second Language Semantic and Syntactic Processing: Evidence From the Declarative/Procedural Model. Esfandiari L; Nilipour R; Nejati V; Maftoon P; Khosrowabadi R Basic Clin Neurosci; 2020; 11(6):841-854. PubMed ID: 33850621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Hemispheric differences in strong versus weak semantic priming: evidence from event-related brain potentials. Frishkoff GA Brain Lang; 2007 Jan; 100(1):23-43. PubMed ID: 16908058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differences in the perception and time course of syntactic and semantic violations. De Vincenzi M; Job R; Di Matteo R; Angrilli A; Penolazzi B; Ciccarelli L; Vespignani F Brain Lang; 2003 May; 85(2):280-96. PubMed ID: 12735945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Late interaction of syntactic and prosodic processes in sentence comprehension as revealed by ERPs. Eckstein K; Friederici AD Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Sep; 25(1):130-43. PubMed ID: 15967649 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Before the N400: effects of lexical-semantic violations in visual cortex. Dikker S; Pylkkanen L Brain Lang; 2011 Jul; 118(1-2):23-8. PubMed ID: 21458057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Getting real about semantic illusions: rethinking the functional role of the P600 in language comprehension. Brouwer H; Fitz H; Hoeks J Brain Res; 2012 Mar; 1446():127-43. PubMed ID: 22361114 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Frontal and posterior sources of event-related potentials in semantic comprehension. Frishkoff GA; Tucker DM; Davey C; Scherg M Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):329-54. PubMed ID: 15268912 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Maturational Constraints on Functional Specializations for Language Processing: ERP and Behavioral Evidence in Bilingual Speakers. Weber-Fox CM; Neville HJ J Cogn Neurosci; 1996; 8(3):231-56. PubMed ID: 23968150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An event-related potential investigation of lexical pitch-accent processing in auditory Japanese. Koso A; Ojima S; Hagiwara H Brain Res; 2011 Apr; 1385():217-28. PubMed ID: 21316355 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of brain mechanisms underlying the processing of Chinese characters and pseudo-characters: an event-related potential study. Wang T; Li H; Zhang Q; Tu S; Yu C; Qiu J Int J Psychol; 2010 Apr; 45(2):102-10. PubMed ID: 22043890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Multiple semantic processes at different levels of syntactic hierarchy: does the higher-level process proceed in face of a lower-level failure? Jiang X; Zhou X Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(8):1918-28. PubMed ID: 22561886 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: a model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Friederici AD Brain Lang; 1995 Sep; 50(3):259-81. PubMed ID: 7583190 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. It's early: event-related potential evidence for initial interaction of syntax and prosody in speech comprehension. Eckstein K; Friederici AD J Cogn Neurosci; 2006 Oct; 18(10):1696-711. PubMed ID: 17014374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Functional Linking Between Negative and Positive ERPs for Syntactic Processing in Japanese: Mutual Enhancement, Syntactic Prediction, and Working Memory Constraints. Tokimoto S; Miyaoka Y; Tokimoto N Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2744. PubMed ID: 31920802 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Testing a model for bilingual semantic priming with interlingual homographs: RT and N400 effects. Kerkhofs R; Dijkstra T; Chwilla DJ; de Bruijn ER Brain Res; 2006 Jan; 1068(1):170-83. PubMed ID: 16375868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]