These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

107 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23973162)

  • 1. Commentary on discrepancies in discrepancy meetings.
    McCoubrie P; FitzGerald R
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Jan; 69(1):11-2. PubMed ID: 23973162
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Discrepancies in discrepancy meetings: results of the UK national discrepancy meeting survey.
    Prowse SJ; Pinkey B; Etherington R
    Clin Radiol; 2014 Jan; 69(1):18-22. PubMed ID: 23969154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perceptual type error in everyday practice.
    Owens EJ; Taylor NR; Howlett DC
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Jun; 71(6):593-601. PubMed ID: 26973044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On-Call Radiology Resident Discrepancies: Categorization by Patient Location and Severity.
    Mellnick V; Raptis C; McWilliams S; Picus D; Wahl R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2016 Oct; 13(10):1233-1238. PubMed ID: 27319372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiological error--an early assessment of departmental radiology discrepancy meetings.
    Driscoll DO; Halpenny D; Guiney M
    Ir Med J; 2012 Jun; 105(6):172-4. PubMed ID: 22973653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The discrepancy rate between preliminary and official reports of emergency radiology studies: a performance indicator and quality improvement method.
    Issa G; Taslakian B; Itani M; Hitti E; Batley N; Saliba M; El-Merhi F
    Acta Radiol; 2015 May; 56(5):598-604. PubMed ID: 24833644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using focused missed-case conferences to reduce discrepancies in musculoskeletal studies interpreted by residents on call.
    Itri JN; Kang HC; Krishnan S; Nathan D; Scanlon MH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Oct; 197(4):W696-705. PubMed ID: 21940542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiology resident interpretations of on-call imaging studies: the incidence of major discrepancies.
    Cooper VF; Goodhartz LA; Nemcek AA; Ryu RK
    Acad Radiol; 2008 Sep; 15(9):1198-204. PubMed ID: 18692761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Re: ownership of medical images.
    Pitman AG; Hare WS
    Australas Radiol; 2007 Apr; 51(2):201. PubMed ID: 17419873
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual error and the culture of open disclosure in Australian radiology.
    Pitman AG
    Australas Radiol; 2006 Jun; 50(3):206-11. PubMed ID: 16732815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual error in radiology.
    Franken EA
    Acad Radiol; 1998 Mar; 5(3):147. PubMed ID: 9522879
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Preliminary interpretations of after-hours CT and sonography by radiology residents versus final interpretations by body imaging radiologists at a level 1 trauma center.
    Carney E; Kempf J; DeCarvalho V; Yudd A; Nosher J
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2003 Aug; 181(2):367-73. PubMed ID: 12876012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quality and variability in diagnostic radiology.
    Alpert HR; Hillman BJ
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2004 Feb; 1(2):127-32. PubMed ID: 17411540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Commentary on implementation of a virtual learning from discrepancy meeting: a method to improve attendance and facilitate shared learning from radiological error.
    Spencer P
    Clin Radiol; 2016 Jun; 71(6):591-2. PubMed ID: 26920436
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Radiological error: analysis, standard setting, targeted instruction and teamworking.
    FitzGerald R
    Eur Radiol; 2005 Aug; 15(8):1760-7. PubMed ID: 15726377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preliminary radiology resident interpretations versus final attending radiologist interpretations and the impact on patient care in a community hospital.
    Ruchman RB; Jaeger J; Wiggins EF; Seinfeld S; Thakral V; Bolla S; Wallach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):523-6. PubMed ID: 17715095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The clinical impact of subspecialized radiologist reinterpretation of abdominal imaging studies, with analysis of the types and relative frequency of interpretation discrepancies.
    Lindgren EA; Patel MD; Wu Q; Melikian J; Hara AK
    Abdom Imaging; 2014 Oct; 39(5):1119-26. PubMed ID: 24748211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Application of the RADPEER™ scoring language to interpretation discrepancies between diagnostic radiology residents and faculty radiologists.
    Maloney E; Lomasney LM; Schomer L
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2012 Apr; 9(4):264-9. PubMed ID: 22469377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Errors in radiologic studies].
    Mali WP
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2002 Apr; 146(17):792-3. PubMed ID: 12014235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An audit of a radiographer based ultrasound service.
    Weston MJ; Morse A; Slack NF
    Br J Radiol; 1994 Jul; 67(799):665-7. PubMed ID: 8062007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.