362 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23973171)
1. Bringing policy relevance and scientific discipline to environmental risk assessment for genetically modified crops.
Herman RA; Garcia-Alonso M; Layton R; Raybould A
Trends Biotechnol; 2013 Sep; 31(9):493-6. PubMed ID: 23973171
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Environmental release of living modified organisms: current approaches and case studies.
Thomas E; Nickson PD
Tsitol Genet; 2005; 39(3):37-42. PubMed ID: 16250244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Derivation and interpretation of hazard quotients to assess ecological risks from the cultivation of insect-resistant transgenic crops.
Raybould A; Caron-Lormier G; Bohan DA
J Agric Food Chem; 2011 Jun; 59(11):5877-85. PubMed ID: 21247173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Europe responds to UK's GM field trials.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 21(12):1418-9. PubMed ID: 14647314
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Risk-Only Assessment of Genetically Engineered Crops Is Risky.
Herman RA; Zhuang M; Storer NP; Cnudde F; Delaney B
Trends Plant Sci; 2019 Jan; 24(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 30385102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Tempest in a tea pot: How did the public conversation on genetically modified crops drift so far from the facts?
Goldstein DA
J Med Toxicol; 2014 Jun; 10(2):194-201. PubMed ID: 24798648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. GM crops in the cross hairs.
Ferber D
Science; 1999 Nov; 286(5445):1662-6. PubMed ID: 10610557
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Popular misconceptions: agricultural biotechnology.
McHughen A; Wager R
N Biotechnol; 2010 Dec; 27(6):724-8. PubMed ID: 20359558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transgenes for tea?
Heritage J
Trends Biotechnol; 2005 Jan; 23(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 15629853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. UK government caught in GM dilemma.
Mitchell P
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Sep; 21(9):957. PubMed ID: 12949540
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. GM in the media.
Moses V
GM Crops Food; 2012; 3(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 22430850
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. New Zealand GMO incident highlights lack of standardized tests.
Norrie C
Nat Biotechnol; 2002 Sep; 20(9):861. PubMed ID: 12205493
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Unintended effects in genetically modified crops: revealed by metabolomics?
Rischer H; Oksman-Caldentey KM
Trends Biotechnol; 2006 Mar; 24(3):102-4. PubMed ID: 16460820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Rejection of gene food in Europe is not rational].
Teeri T
Duodecim; 2009; 125(24):2697-703. PubMed ID: 20175322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. GM crops: a continent divided.
Masood E
Nature; 2003 Nov; 426(6964):224-6. PubMed ID: 14628018
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Ethical reflections on herbicide-resistant crops.
Madsen KH; Sandøe P
Pest Manag Sci; 2005 Mar; 61(3):318-25. PubMed ID: 15627240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Promise and issues of genetically modified crops.
Chen H; Lin Y
Curr Opin Plant Biol; 2013 May; 16(2):255-60. PubMed ID: 23571013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trials, tribulations and diversification.
Nat Biotechnol; 2003 Dec; 21(12):1411. PubMed ID: 14647307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Coexistence in the EU-return of the moratorium on GM crops?
Devos Y; Demont M; Sanvido O
Nat Biotechnol; 2008 Nov; 26(11):1223-5. PubMed ID: 18997757
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Genetically modified crops: success, safety assessment, and public concern.
Singh OV; Ghai S; Paul D; Jain RK
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2006 Aug; 71(5):598-607. PubMed ID: 16639559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
