These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23975760)

  • 1. Surveying clinicians by web: current issues in design and administration.
    Dykema J; Jones NR; Piché T; Stevenson J
    Eval Health Prof; 2013 Sep; 36(3):352-81. PubMed ID: 23975760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhancing surveys of health care professionals: a meta-analysis of techniques to improve response.
    Cho YI; Johnson TP; Vangeest JB
    Eval Health Prof; 2013 Sep; 36(3):382-407. PubMed ID: 23975761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improving the quality of surveys of physicians and medical groups: a research agenda.
    Klabunde CN; Willis GB; McLeod CC; Dillman DA; Johnson TP; Greene SM; Brown ML
    Eval Health Prof; 2012 Dec; 35(4):477-506. PubMed ID: 22947596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians.
    Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ
    Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Response rates and representativeness: a lottery incentive improves physician survey return rates.
    Robertson J; Walkom EJ; McGettigan P
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2005 Aug; 14(8):571-7. PubMed ID: 15937989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Health care provider surveys in the United States, 2000-2010: a review.
    McLeod CC; Klabunde CN; Willis GB; Stark D
    Eval Health Prof; 2013 Mar; 36(1):106-26. PubMed ID: 23378504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surveying nurses: identifying strategies to improve participation.
    VanGeest J; Johnson TP
    Eval Health Prof; 2011 Dec; 34(4):487-511. PubMed ID: 21454329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Challenges using online surveys in a Danish population of people with type 2 diabetes.
    Schiøtz M; Bøgelund M; Willaing I
    Chronic Illn; 2012 Mar; 8(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 21933880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of incentives and prenotification on response rates and costs in a national web survey of physicians.
    Dykema J; Stevenson J; Day B; Sellers SL; Bonham VL
    Eval Health Prof; 2011 Dec; 34(4):434-47. PubMed ID: 21613242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A monetary incentive increases postal survey response rates for pharmacists.
    Paul CL; Walsh RA; Tzelepis F
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 2005 Dec; 59(12):1099-101. PubMed ID: 16286502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How to obtain excellent response rates when surveying physicians.
    Thorpe C; Ryan B; McLean SL; Burt A; Stewart M; Brown JB; Reid GJ; Harris S
    Fam Pract; 2009 Feb; 26(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 19074758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The cost-effectiveness of cash versus lottery incentives for a web-based, stated-preference community survey.
    Gajic A; Cameron D; Hurley J
    Eur J Health Econ; 2012 Dec; 13(6):789-99. PubMed ID: 21691841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facilitators and barriers to survey participation by physicians: a call to action for researchers.
    Klabunde CN; Willis GB; Casalino LP
    Eval Health Prof; 2013 Sep; 36(3):279-95. PubMed ID: 23975758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Getting a Valid Survey Response From 662 Plastic Surgeons in the 21st Century.
    Reinisch JF; Yu DC; Li WY
    Ann Plast Surg; 2016 Jan; 76(1):3-5. PubMed ID: 26418779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing the Impact of Mixed-Mode Designs (Mail and Web) and Multiple Contact Attempts within Mode (Mail or Web) on Clinician Survey Response.
    Beebe TJ; Jacobson RM; Jenkins SM; Lackore KA; Rutten LJF
    Health Serv Res; 2018 Aug; 53 Suppl 1(Suppl Suppl 1):3070-3083. PubMed ID: 29355920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A randomised trial and economic evaluation of the effect of response mode on response rate, response bias, and item non-response in a survey of doctors.
    Scott A; Jeon SH; Joyce CM; Humphreys JS; Kalb G; Witt J; Leahy A
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2011 Sep; 11():126. PubMed ID: 21888678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing rural and urban emergency clinicians' participation in an online knowledge exchange intervention.
    Curran JA; Murphy AL; Sinclair D; McGrath P
    Rural Remote Health; 2013; 13(1):2175. PubMed ID: 23374031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of different monetary incentives on the return rate of a national mail survey of physicians.
    VanGeest JB; Wynia MK; Cummins DS; Wilson IB
    Med Care; 2001 Feb; 39(2):197-201. PubMed ID: 11176557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Utility of Web-based assessment of patient satisfaction with endoscopy.
    Harewood GC; Wiersema MJ; de Groen PC
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2003 May; 98(5):1016-21. PubMed ID: 12809822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Using incentives in surveys of cancer patients: do "best practices" apply?
    Vangeest JB; Johnson TP
    Cancer Causes Control; 2012 Dec; 23(12):2047-52. PubMed ID: 23076587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.