These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23977211)

  • 1. I choose, therefore I like: preference for faces induced by arbitrary choice.
    Nakamura K; Kawabata H
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e72071. PubMed ID: 23977211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of health in human faces is context-dependent.
    Morgan KV; Morton A; Whitehead RD; Perrett DI; Hurly TA; Healy SD
    Behav Processes; 2016 Apr; 125():89-95. PubMed ID: 26869219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Manipulation detection and preference alterations in a choice blindness paradigm.
    Taya F; Gupta S; Farber I; Mullette-Gillman OA
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(9):e108515. PubMed ID: 25247886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Modulation of Alpha Oscillations in the Human EEG with Facial Preference.
    Kang JH; Kim SJ; Cho YS; Kim SP
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(9):e0138153. PubMed ID: 26394328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Preference for facial self-resemblance and attractiveness in human mate choice.
    Kocsor F; Rezneki R; Juhász S; Bereczkei T
    Arch Sex Behav; 2011 Dec; 40(6):1263-70. PubMed ID: 21267643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Choosing what we like vs liking what we choose: How choice-induced preference change might actually be instrumental to decision-making.
    Lee D; Daunizeau J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0231081. PubMed ID: 32421699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preference for attractive faces in human infants extends beyond conspecifics.
    Quinn PC; Kelly DJ; Lee K; Pascalis O; Slater AM
    Dev Sci; 2008 Jan; 11(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 18171370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. When Not Choosing Leads to Not Liking: Choice-Induced Preference in Infancy.
    Silver AM; Stahl AE; Loiotile R; Smith-Flores AS; Feigenson L
    Psychol Sci; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1422-1429. PubMed ID: 33006289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Distinct neural correlates of the preference-related valuation of supraliminally and subliminally presented faces.
    Ito A; Abe N; Kawachi Y; Kawasaki I; Ueno A; Yoshida K; Sakai S; Matsue Y; Fujii T
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2015 Aug; 36(8):2865-77. PubMed ID: 25880023
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Happy faces are preferred regardless of familiarity--sad faces are preferred only when familiar.
    Liao HI; Shimojo S; Yeh SL
    Emotion; 2013 Jun; 13(3):391-6. PubMed ID: 23356560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Infant's visual preferences for facial traits associated with adult attractiveness judgements: data from eye-tracking.
    Griffey JA; Little AC
    Infant Behav Dev; 2014 Aug; 37(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 24793735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Facial-Attractiveness Choices Are Predicted by Divisive Normalization.
    Furl N
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Oct; 27(10):1379-1387. PubMed ID: 27565534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Average ovarian hormone levels, rather than daily values and their fluctuations, are related to facial preferences among women.
    Marcinkowska UM; Kaminski G; Little AC; Jasienska G
    Horm Behav; 2018 Jun; 102():114-119. PubMed ID: 29778461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with anxiety disorder.
    Lokkerbol J; van Voorthuijsen JM; Geomini A; Tiemens B; van Straten A; Smit F; Risseeuw A; van Balkom A; Hiligsmann M
    J Med Econ; 2019 Feb; 22(2):169-177. PubMed ID: 30501135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Hard Decisions Shape the Neural Coding of Preferences.
    Voigt K; Murawski C; Speer S; Bode S
    J Neurosci; 2019 Jan; 39(4):718-726. PubMed ID: 30530856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of exogenous testosterone and mating context on men's preferences for female facial femininity.
    Bird BM; Welling LLM; Ortiz TL; Moreau BJP; Hansen S; Emond M; Goldfarb B; Bonin PL; Carré JM
    Horm Behav; 2016 Sep; 85():76-85. PubMed ID: 27511452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of sexual dimorphism on the attractiveness evaluation of one's own face.
    Li Z; Hu Z; Liu H
    Vision Res; 2020 Mar; 168():1-8. PubMed ID: 32044585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Choice Reminder Modulates Choice-Induced Preference Change in Older Adults.
    Huang Y; Li M; Yu R
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2023 Jan; 78(1):73-81. PubMed ID: 36130192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A discrete-choice experiment to assess treatment modality preferences of patients with depression.
    Lokkerbol J; Geomini A; van Voorthuijsen J; van Straten A; Tiemens B; Smit F; Risseeuw A; Hiligsmann M
    J Med Econ; 2019 Feb; 22(2):178-186. PubMed ID: 30501437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. On the relative reinforcing effects of choice and differential consequences.
    Fisher WW; Thompson RH; Piazza CC; Crosland K; Gotjen D
    J Appl Behav Anal; 1997; 30(3):423-38. PubMed ID: 9316257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.