These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2397830)
1. [Adhesion of liners to dentin. In vivo experiments]. Mason PN Dent Cadmos; 1990 Feb; 58(3):38-44, 47-9. PubMed ID: 2397830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. In vivo evaluation of glass-ionomer cement adhesion to dentin. Mason PN; Ferrari M Quintessence Int; 1994 Jul; 25(7):499-504. PubMed ID: 7991772 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of liners under amalgam restorations: an in vitro study on marginal leakage. Marchiori S; Baratieri LN; de Andrada MA; Monteiro Júnior S; Ritter AV Quintessence Int; 1998 Oct; 29(10):637-42. PubMed ID: 9922761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bonded amalgam restorations: using a glass-ionomer as an adhesive liner. Chen RS; Liu CC; Cheng MR; Lin CP Oper Dent; 2000; 25(5):411-7. PubMed ID: 11203849 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of water spray on lining materials and their adhesion to composite and dentin cavity walls. Ben-Amar A; Geiger S; Liberman R Dent Mater; 1991 Oct; 7(4):274-8. PubMed ID: 1667641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The effect of base/liner use on restoration leakage. von Fraunhofer JA; Marshall KR; Holman BG Gen Dent; 2006; 54(2):106-9. PubMed ID: 16689065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Marginal leakage in class V composite resin restorations with glass ionomer liners in vitro. Mathis RS; DeWald JP; Moody CR; Ferracane JL J Prosthet Dent; 1990 May; 63(5):522-5. PubMed ID: 2338665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Micro-gap formations in Class V restorations using 4 types of composites and glass ionomer linings]. Gordon M; Plasschaert AJ; Soelberg K; Bogdan MS Tidsskr Tandlaeger; 1986 Apr; 6(2):71-3. PubMed ID: 3462962 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Class II composite resin restorations using glass-ionomer liners: microleakage studies. Aboushala A; Kugel G; Hurley E J Clin Pediatr Dent; 1996; 21(1):67-70. PubMed ID: 9161210 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation. Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Marginal leakage of restorations using a glass-ionomer liner in bonding composite resins to dentin. Hembree JH; Tindle RR; Strange C Miss Dent Assoc J; 1990; 46(1):20-3. PubMed ID: 2197543 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Effect of glass ionomer cements and dentin adhesives on the marginal seal of cervical composite fillings]. Haller B; Klaiber B; Götze W; Piatka E Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1987 Jun; 42(6):588-93. PubMed ID: 3483744 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Liners, bases, and cements: an in-depth review, part 1. Weiner R Dent Today; 2008 May; 27(5):72, 74, 76; quiz 78. PubMed ID: 18505028 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage of glass ionomer/composite laminate Class V restorations. McInnes P; Perkins E; Weinberg R Am J Dent; 1990 Feb; 3(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 2375848 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Microleakage of Class V composite, resin sandwich, and resin-modified glass ionomers. Trushkowsky RD; Gwinnett AJ Am J Dent; 1996 Jun; 9(3):96-9. PubMed ID: 9002797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of flowable liner and margin location on microleakage of conventional and packable class II resin composites. Tredwin CJ; Stokes A; Moles DR Oper Dent; 2005; 30(1):32-8. PubMed ID: 15765955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An in-vitro investigation of microleakage and gap size of glass ionomer/composite resin "sandwich" restorations in primary teeth. Reid JS; Saunders WP; Sharkey SW; Williams CE ASDC J Dent Child; 1994; 61(4):255-9. PubMed ID: 7989627 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Strength of glass polyalkenoate cements in relation to shrinking of composite resins during polymerization]. Kullman W Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1987 Jun; 42(6):577-9. PubMed ID: 3483742 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparative quantitative and qualitative assessment of the marginal adaptation and apposition of bonded amalgam restorations using luting glass ionomer and 4-META adhesive liner under a scanning electron microscope. An in vitro study. Abraham MM; Sudeep PT; Bhat KS Indian J Dent Res; 1999; 10(2):43-53. PubMed ID: 10865391 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]