These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23978606)

  • 21. Implications of corn prices on water footprints of bioethanol.
    Suh K; Suh S; Smith T
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(7):4747-54. PubMed ID: 21306890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of three cotton stalk waste sustainable applications.
    Ibrahim RA; Inan H; Fahim IS
    Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20781. PubMed ID: 38012270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Analysis of sustainable utilization of water resources based on the improved water resources ecological footprint model: A case study of Hubei Province, China.
    Wang H; Huang J; Zhou H; Deng C; Fang C
    J Environ Manage; 2020 May; 262():110331. PubMed ID: 32250810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Characterisation and evaluation of a novel feedstock, Manihot glaziovii, Muell. Arg, for production of bioenergy carriers: Bioethanol and biogas.
    Moshi AP; Crespo CF; Badshah M; Hosea KMM; Mshandete AM; Elisante E; Mattiasson B
    Bioresour Technol; 2014 Nov; 172():58-67. PubMed ID: 25237774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Ecological footprint and available ecological capacity in Chongqing region].
    Sun F; Mong L
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2005 Jul; 16(7):1370-4. PubMed ID: 16252886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Non-destructive analysis of the conformational differences among feedstock sources and their corresponding co-products from bioethanol production with molecular spectroscopy.
    Gamage IH; Jonker A; Zhang X; Yu P
    Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc; 2014 Jan; 118():407-21. PubMed ID: 24076457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Techno-ecological synergy: a framework for sustainable engineering.
    Bakshi BR; Ziv G; Lepech MD
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(3):1752-60. PubMed ID: 25560912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Ecological footprint calculation and development capacity analysis of China in 1999].
    Xu Z; Zhang Z; Cheng G; Chen D
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2003 Feb; 14(2):280-5. PubMed ID: 12827888
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Sustainability evaluation based on the Three-dimensional Ecological Footprint and Human Development Index: A case study on the four island regions in China.
    Long X; Yu H; Sun M; Wang XC; Klemeš JJ; Xie W; Wang C; Li W; Wang Y
    J Environ Manage; 2020 Jul; 265():110509. PubMed ID: 32421554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of bioethanol plant and coproduct type on the metabolic characteristics of the proteins in dairy cattle.
    Nuez-Ortín WG; Yu P
    J Dairy Sci; 2010 Aug; 93(8):3775-83. PubMed ID: 20655447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Evaluation and Prediction of the Ecological Footprint and Ecological Carrying Capacity for Yangtze River Urban Agglomeration Based on the Grey Model.
    Peng B; Wang Y; Elahi E; Wei G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Nov; 15(11):. PubMed ID: 30428569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Bio-ethanol production from non-food parts of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz).
    Nuwamanya E; Chiwona-Karltun L; Kawuki RS; Baguma Y
    Ambio; 2012 May; 41(3):262-70. PubMed ID: 22535425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. [Assessment of ecosystem and its services conservation: indicators and methods].
    Lü YH; Zhang LW; Wang JL
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2013 May; 24(5):1237-43. PubMed ID: 24015539
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Techno-ecological synergy as a path toward sustainability of a North American residential system.
    Urban RA; Bakshi BR
    Environ Sci Technol; 2013 Feb; 47(4):1985-93. PubMed ID: 23294016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Provincial ecological footprint of China in the year of 2002].
    Chen M; Wang R; Zhang L; Huai B
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2006 Mar; 17(3):424-8. PubMed ID: 16724736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Ecological footprint of Shandong, China.
    Cui YJ; Luc H; Zhu YG; Zhao JZ
    J Environ Sci (China); 2004; 16(1):167-72. PubMed ID: 14971475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Shrink and share: humanity's present and future Ecological Footprint.
    Kitzes J; Wackernagel M; Loh J; Peller A; Goldfinger S; Cheng D; Tea K
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Feb; 363(1491):467-75. PubMed ID: 17652075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Ecological footprint in building green university].
    Gu XW; Li GJ; Wang Q; Liu JX; Ding Y; Liu JZ
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2005 Jul; 26(4):200-4. PubMed ID: 16212197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Sustainable feedstock for bioethanol production: Impact of spatial resolution on the design of a sustainable biomass supply-chain.
    Sharara MA; Sahoo K; Reddy AD; Kim S; Zhang X; Dale B; Jones CD; Izaurralde RC; Runge TM
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Apr; 302():122896. PubMed ID: 32018088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass.
    Zhao XQ; Zi LH; Bai FW; Lin HL; Hao XM; Yue GJ; Ho NW
    Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol; 2012; 128():25-51. PubMed ID: 22138971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.