346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23979614)
1. Predicting factors on cervical ripening and response to induction in women pregnant over 37 weeks.
Bahadori F; Ayatollahi H; Naghavi-Behzad M; Khalkhali H; Naseri Z
Med Ultrason; 2013 Sep; 15(3):191-8. PubMed ID: 23979614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of labor using one dose vs multiple doses of misoprostol: a randomized controlled trial.
Pimentel VM; Arabkhazaeli M; Moon JY; Wang A; Kapedani A; Bernstein PS; Tropper PJ
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun; 218(6):614.e1-614.e8. PubMed ID: 29614276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for preinduction cervical ripening and labor induction.
Chang CH; Chang FM
J Formos Med Assoc; 1997 May; 96(5):366-9. PubMed ID: 9170825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ultrasound assessment of fetal head-perineum distance before induction of labor.
Eggebø TM; Heien C; Økland I; Gjessing LK; Romundstad P; Salvesen KA
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 32(2):199-204. PubMed ID: 18528923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of Foley catheter pre-induction of labor].
Jagielska I; Kazdepka-Ziemińska A; Janicki R; Fórmaniak J; Walentowicz-Sadłecka M; Grabiec M
Ginekol Pol; 2013 Mar; 84(3):180-5. PubMed ID: 23700844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Intravaginal misoprostol as a cervical ripening agent.
Fletcher HM; Mitchell S; Simeon D; Frederick J; Brown D
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Jul; 100(7):641-4. PubMed ID: 8369246
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Induction of labor with misoprostol for premature rupture of membranes beyond thirty-six weeks' gestation.
Wing DA; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1998 Jul; 179(1):94-9. PubMed ID: 9704771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Labor induction post-term with 25 micrograms vs. 50 micrograms of intravaginal misoprostol.
Meydanli MM; Calişkan E; Burak F; Narin MA; Atmaca R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 81(3):249-55. PubMed ID: 12767565
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting the likelihood of successful induction after intravaginal misoprostol application for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Tran S; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2002 Jun; 186(6):1237-40; discussion 1240-3. PubMed ID: 12066104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of intermittent vaginal administration of misoprostol with continuous dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ortiz-Omphroy G; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1997 Sep; 177(3):612-8. PubMed ID: 9322632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bishop score and the outcome of labor induction with misoprostol.
Szczesny W; Kjøllesdal M; Karlsson B; Nielsen S
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(5):579-82. PubMed ID: 16752237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cervical ripening and induction of labor with intravaginal misoprostol and Foley catheter cervical traction.
Kashanian M; Akbarian AR; Fekrat M
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2006 Jan; 92(1):79-80. PubMed ID: 16246342
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cervical ripening by prostaglandin E2 in patients with a previous cesarean section.
Bouchghoul H; Zeino S; Houllier M; Senat MV
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2020 Apr; 49(4):101699. PubMed ID: 32018044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Cervical Foley catheter versus vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial].
Oliveira MV; Oberst PV; Leite GK; Aguemi A; Kenj G; Leme VD; Sass N
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet; 2010 Jul; 32(7):346-51. PubMed ID: 21152844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Misoprostol: an effective agent for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Rahall A; Jones MM; Goodwin TM; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1995 Jun; 172(6):1811-6. PubMed ID: 7778637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of orally administered misoprostol with vaginally administered misoprostol for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Wing DA; Ham D; Paul RH
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May; 180(5):1155-60. PubMed ID: 10329871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison between vaginal misoprostol and cervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Neiger R; Greaves PC
Tenn Med; 2001 Jan; 94(1):25-7. PubMed ID: 11194687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Preinduction cervical ripening. A randomized trial of intravaginal misoprostol alone vs. a combination of transcervical Foley balloon and intravaginal misoprostol.
Rust OA; Greybush M; Atlas RO; Jones KJ; Balducci J
J Reprod Med; 2001 Oct; 46(10):899-904. PubMed ID: 11725734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Misoprostol for induction of labour: a systematic review.
Hofmeyr GJ; Gülmezoglu AM; Alfirevic Z
Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):798-803. PubMed ID: 10453829
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of effectiveness and safety of cervical ripening methods for induction of labour: A population-based study using coarsened exact matching.
Blanc-Petitjean P; Carbonne B; Deneux-Tharaux C; Salomé M; Goffinet F; Le Ray C;
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol; 2019 Sep; 33(5):313-322. PubMed ID: 31342567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
