339 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23981084)
1. Effect of Metal Extension of Crown in the Screw Access Channel of a Posterior Implant Abutment on the Retention of Cement Retained Prosthesis.
Biyani R; Ali M; Belles D; Powers JM
J Oral Implantol; 2015 Oct; 41(5):537-41. PubMed ID: 23981084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of axial wall modification on the retention of cement-retained, implant-supported crowns.
Tan KM; Masri R; Driscoll CF; Limkangwalmongkol P; Romberg E
J Prosthet Dent; 2012 Feb; 107(2):80-5. PubMed ID: 22304741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
Carnaggio TV; Conrad R; Engelmeier RL; Gerngross P; Paravina R; Perezous L; Powers JM
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effects of abutment wall height, platform size, and screw access channel filling method on resistance to dislodgement of cement-retained, implant-supported restorations.
Emms M; Tredwin CJ; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2007; 16(1):3-9. PubMed ID: 17244301
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of Preseating, Screw Access Opening, and Vent Holes on Extrusion of Excess Cement at the Crown-Abutment Margin and Associated Tensile Force for Cement-Retained Implant Restorations.
Jimenez RA; Vargas-Koudriavtsev T
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(4):807-12. PubMed ID: 27447146
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of modifying the screw access channels of zirconia implant abutment on the cement flow pattern and retention of zirconia restorations.
Wadhwani C; Chung KH
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Jul; 112(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 24680357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of the Unfilled Space Size of the Abutment Screw Access Hole on the Extruded Excess Cement and Retention of Single Implant Zirconia Crowns.
Al-Johany SS; Al Amri MD; Al-Bakri AS; Al-Qarni MN
J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb; 28(2):179-184. PubMed ID: 28102922
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The comparison of provisional luting agents and abutment surface roughness on the retention of provisional implant-supported crowns.
Kim Y; Yamashita J; Shotwell JL; Chong KH; Wang HL
J Prosthet Dent; 2006 Jun; 95(6):450-5. PubMed ID: 16765158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The effect of engaging the screw access channel of an implant abutment with a cement-retained restoration.
Naik S; Tredwin CJ; Nesbit M; Setchell DJ; Moles DR
J Prosthodont; 2009 Apr; 18(3):245-8. PubMed ID: 19141047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of screw access channel filling materials on uniaxial retentive force of cement-retained implant restorations.
Cakan U; Gultekin P; Guncu MB; Canay S
Aust Dent J; 2014 Mar; 59(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 24494783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of abutment height and surface roughness on in vitro retention of three luting agents.
Cano-Batalla J; Soliva-Garriga J; Campillo-Funollet M; Munoz-Viveros CA; Giner-Tarrida L
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 22299076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of screw access on the retention of cement-retained implant prostheses.
da Rocha PV; Freitas MA; de Morais Alves da Cunha T
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):264-8. PubMed ID: 23566608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An in vitro assessment of circumferential grooves on the retention of cement-retained implant-supported crowns.
Lewinstein I; Block L; Lehr Z; Ormianer Z; Matalon S
J Prosthet Dent; 2011 Dec; 106(6):367-72. PubMed ID: 22133393
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of 3 luting agents on retention of implant-supported crowns on 2 different abutments.
Güncü MB; Cakan U; Canay S
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):349-53. PubMed ID: 21811170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
Farzin M; Torabi K; Ahangari AH; Derafshi R
J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cement selection for implant-supported crowns fabricated with different luting space settings.
Gultekin P; Gultekin BA; Aydin M; Yalcin S
J Prosthodont; 2013 Feb; 22(2):112-9. PubMed ID: 23387964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cementable implant crowns composed of cast superstructure frameworks luted to electroformed primary copings: an in vitro retention study.
Di Felice R; Rappelli G; Camaioni E; Cattani M; Meyer JM; Belser UC
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Feb; 18(1):108-13. PubMed ID: 17224031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. In vitro retentive strength of metal superstructures cemented to solid abutments.
Rappelli G; Corso M; Coccia E; Camaioni E; Di Felice R; Procaccini M
Minerva Stomatol; 2008 Mar; 57(3):95-101. PubMed ID: 18427377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the Effect of Axial Wall Modification and Coping Design on the Retention of Cement-retained Implant-supported Crowns.
Derafshi R; Ahangari AH; Torabi K; Farzin M
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects; 2015; 9(1):35-9. PubMed ID: 25973152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Precision of fit and retention force of cast non-precious-crowns on standard titanium implant-abutment with different design and height.
Enkling N; Ueda T; Gholami H; Bayer S; Katsoulis J; Mericske-Stern R
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Apr; 25(4):451-7. PubMed ID: 23551713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
