BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

299 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23981707)

  • 1. Bioremediation of copper-containing wastewater by sulfate reducing bacteria coupled with iron.
    Bai H; Kang Y; Quan H; Han Y; Sun J; Feng Y
    J Environ Manage; 2013 Nov; 129():350-6. PubMed ID: 23981707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Enhanced bioremediation of heavy metal from effluent by sulfate-reducing bacteria with copper-iron bimetallic particles support.
    Zhou Q; Chen Y; Yang M; Li W; Deng L
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 May; 136():413-7. PubMed ID: 23567710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Treating Cr(VI)-containing wastewater by a consortium of sulfate reducing bacteria and copper-iron bimetallic particles].
    He QZ; Chen H; Wang D; Li H; Ding XH; Deng L
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2011 Jul; 32(7):2000-5. PubMed ID: 21922821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Anaerobic treatment of landfill leachate by sulfate reduction.
    Henry JG; Prasad D
    Water Sci Technol; 2000; 41(3):239-46. PubMed ID: 11381997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bioaugmented sulfate reduction using enriched anaerobic microflora in the presence of zero valent iron.
    Xin Y; Yong K; Duujong L; Ying F
    Chemosphere; 2008 Nov; 73(9):1436-41. PubMed ID: 18840389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Heavy metal removal in anaerobic semi-continuous stirred tank reactors by a consortium of sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Kieu HT; Müller E; Horn H
    Water Res; 2011 Jul; 45(13):3863-70. PubMed ID: 21632086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Enhanced sulfate reduction with acidogenic sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Wang A; Ren N; Wang X; Lee D
    J Hazard Mater; 2008 Jun; 154(1-3):1060-5. PubMed ID: 18093734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Column experiments to assess the effects of electron donors on the efficiency of in situ precipitation of Zn, Cd, Co and Ni in contaminated groundwater applying the biological sulfate removal technology.
    Geets J; Vanbroekhoven K; Borremans B; Vangronsveld J; Diels L; van der Lelie D
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2006 Oct; 13(6):362-78. PubMed ID: 17120826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sulfidogenic fluidized-bed treatment of metal-containing wastewater at low and high temperatures.
    Sahinkaya E; Ozkaya B; Kaksonen AH; Puhakka JA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Apr; 96(6):1064-72. PubMed ID: 17004272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microbial sulfate reduction under sequentially acidic conditions in an upflow anaerobic packed bed bioreactor.
    Jong T; Parry DL
    Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(13):2561-71. PubMed ID: 16814360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Characterization and activity studies of highly heavy metal resistant sulphate-reducing bacteria to be used in acid mine drainage decontamination.
    Martins M; Faleiro ML; Barros RJ; Veríssimo AR; Barreiros MA; Costa MC
    J Hazard Mater; 2009 Jul; 166(2-3):706-13. PubMed ID: 19135795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neural network prediction of thermophilic (65 degrees C) sulfidogenic fluidized-bed reactor performance for the treatment of metal-containing wastewater.
    Sahinkaya E; Ozkaya B; Kaksonen AH; Puhakka JA
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2007 Jul; 97(4):780-7. PubMed ID: 17154306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantification of toxic and inhibitory impact of copper and zinc on mixed cultures of sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Utgikar VP; Tabak HH; Haines JR; Govind R
    Biotechnol Bioeng; 2003 May; 82(3):306-12. PubMed ID: 12599257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of cattail biomass on sulfate removal and carbon sources competition in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands treating secondary effluent.
    Chen Y; Wen Y; Zhou J; Tang Z; Li L; Zhou Q; Vymazal J
    Water Res; 2014 Aug; 59():1-10. PubMed ID: 24768761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bioremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soils by sulfate-reducing bacteria.
    Jiang W; Fan W
    Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2008 Oct; 1140():446-54. PubMed ID: 18991946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Mixed sulfate-reducing bacteria-enriched microbial fuel cells for the treatment of wastewater containing copper.
    Miran W; Jang J; Nawaz M; Shahzad A; Jeong SE; Jeon CO; Lee DS
    Chemosphere; 2017 Dec; 189():134-142. PubMed ID: 28934653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An assessment of sulfate reducing bacteria on treating sulfate-rich metal-laden wastewater from electroplating plant.
    Hu K; Xu D; Chen Y
    J Hazard Mater; 2020 Jul; 393():122376. PubMed ID: 32114127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Contributions of fermentative acidogenic bacteria and sulfate-reducing bacteria to lactate degradation and sulfate reduction.
    Zhao Y; Ren N; Wang A
    Chemosphere; 2008 May; 72(2):233-42. PubMed ID: 18331751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of acid mine drainage by sulfate reducing bacteria with iron in bench scale runs.
    Bai H; Kang Y; Quan H; Han Y; Sun J; Feng Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2013 Jan; 128():818-22. PubMed ID: 23182037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Simultaneous sulfate reduction and copper removal by a PVA-immobilized sulfate reducing bacterial culture.
    Hsu HF; Jhuo YS; Kumar M; Ma YS; Lin JG
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 Jun; 101(12):4354-61. PubMed ID: 20153634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.