These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

199 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23981781)

  • 1. In vivo demonstration of cancer molecular imaging with ultrasound radiation force and buried-ligand microbubbles.
    Borden MA; Streeter JE; Sirsi SR; Dayton PA
    Mol Imaging; 2013 Sep; 12(6):357-63. PubMed ID: 23981781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. An in vivo validation of the application of acoustic radiation force to enhance the diagnostic utility of molecular imaging using 3-d ultrasound.
    Gessner RC; Streeter JE; Kothadia R; Feingold S; Dayton PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Apr; 38(4):651-60. PubMed ID: 22341052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Molecular Acoustic Angiography: A New Technique for High-resolution Superharmonic Ultrasound Molecular Imaging.
    Shelton SE; Lindsey BD; Tsuruta JK; Foster FS; Dayton PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Mar; 42(3):769-81. PubMed ID: 26678155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improving sensitivity in ultrasound molecular imaging by tailoring contrast agent size distribution: in vivo studies.
    Streeter JE; Gessner R; Miles I; Dayton PA
    Mol Imaging; 2010 Apr; 9(2):87-95. PubMed ID: 20236606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Microbubbles as ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging: preparation and application.
    Unnikrishnan S; Klibanov AL
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2012 Aug; 199(2):292-9. PubMed ID: 22826389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ultrasound radiation force modulates ligand availability on targeted contrast agents.
    Borden MA; Sarantos MR; Stieger SM; Simon SI; Ferrara KW; Dayton PA
    Mol Imaging; 2006 Jul; 5(3):139-47. PubMed ID: 16954028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of surface architecture on in vivo ultrasound contrast persistence of targeted size-selected microbubbles.
    Chen CC; Sirsi SR; Homma S; Borden MA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Mar; 38(3):492-503. PubMed ID: 22305060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optical Verification of Microbubble Response to Acoustic Radiation Force in Large Vessels With In Vivo Results.
    Wang S; Wang CY; Unnikrishnan S; Klibanov AL; Hossack JA; Mauldin FW
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Nov; 50(11):772-84. PubMed ID: 26135018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Preparation of targeted microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for molecular imaging.
    Klibanov AL
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2009 Aug; 47(8):875-82. PubMed ID: 19517153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A stimulus-responsive contrast agent for ultrasound molecular imaging.
    Borden MA; Zhang H; Gillies RJ; Dayton PA; Ferrara KW
    Biomaterials; 2008 Feb; 29(5):597-606. PubMed ID: 17977595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An in vivo evaluation of the effect of repeated administration and clearance of targeted contrast agents on molecular imaging signal enhancement.
    Streeter JE; Dayton PA
    Theranostics; 2013; 3(2):93-8. PubMed ID: 23424189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Formation of Microbubbles for Targeted Ultrasound Contrast Imaging: Practical Translation Considerations.
    Unnikrishnan S; Du Z; Diakova GB; Klibanov AL
    Langmuir; 2019 Aug; 35(31):10034-10041. PubMed ID: 30509068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Quantitative ultrasound molecular imaging by modeling the binding kinetics of targeted contrast agent.
    Turco S; Tardy I; Frinking P; Wijkstra H; Mischi M
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Mar; 62(6):2449-2464. PubMed ID: 28240217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Optimizing Sensitivity of Ultrasound Contrast-Enhanced Super-Resolution Imaging by Tailoring Size Distribution of Microbubble Contrast Agent.
    Lin F; Tsuruta JK; Rojas JD; Dayton PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 43(10):2488-2493. PubMed ID: 28668636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. In Vivo Molecular Imaging Using Low-Boiling-Point Phase-Change Contrast Agents: A Proof of Concept Study.
    Rojas JD; Dayton PA
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2019 Jan; 45(1):177-191. PubMed ID: 30318123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Unbinding of targeted ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by secondary acoustic forces.
    Garbin V; Overvelde M; Dollet B; de Jong N; Lohse D; Versluis M
    Phys Med Biol; 2011 Oct; 56(19):6161-77. PubMed ID: 21878709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. In vivo quantification of ultrasound targeted microbubbles to enhance cancer assessment.
    Sciallero C; Daglio E; Trucco A
    Contrast Media Mol Imaging; 2016 Jul; 11(4):313-8. PubMed ID: 27157493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Monodispersity Increases Adhesion Efficiency and Specificity for Ultrasound-Targeted Microbubbles.
    Navarro-Becerra JA; Castillo JI; Di Ruzza F; Borden MA
    ACS Biomater Sci Eng; 2023 Feb; 9(2):991-1001. PubMed ID: 36153974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A sensitive TLRH targeted imaging technique for ultrasonic molecular imaging.
    Hu X; Zheng H; Kruse DE; Sutcliffe P; Stephens DN; Ferrara KW
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2010; 57(2):305-16. PubMed ID: 20178897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.