These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Statistics for proteomics: a review of tools for analyzing experimental data. Urfer W; Grzegorczyk M; Jung K Proteomics; 2006 Sep; 6 Suppl 2():48-55. PubMed ID: 17031797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MSstats: an R package for statistical analysis of quantitative mass spectrometry-based proteomic experiments. Choi M; Chang CY; Clough T; Broudy D; Killeen T; MacLean B; Vitek O Bioinformatics; 2014 Sep; 30(17):2524-6. PubMed ID: 24794931 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Statistical Evaluation of Labeled Comparative Profiling Proteomics Experiments Using Permutation Test. Nguyen HD; McLachlan GJ; Hill MM Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1549():109-117. PubMed ID: 27975287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Strategies for a reliable biostatistical analysis of differentially expressed spots from two-dimensional electrophoresis gels. Eravci M; Mansmann U; Broedel O; Weist S; Buetow S; Wittke J; Brunkau C; Hummel M; Eravci S; Baumgartner A J Proteome Res; 2009 May; 8(5):2601-7. PubMed ID: 19290622 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Automated image alignment for 2D gel electrophoresis in a high-throughput proteomics pipeline. Dowsey AW; Dunn MJ; Yang GZ Bioinformatics; 2008 Apr; 24(7):950-7. PubMed ID: 18310057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A statistical model to identify differentially expressed proteins in 2D PAGE gels. Wu SH; Black MA; North RA; Atkinson KR; Rodrigo AG PLoS Comput Biol; 2009 Sep; 5(9):e1000509. PubMed ID: 19763172 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The optimal discovery procedure for large-scale significance testing, with applications to comparative microarray experiments. Storey JD; Dai JY; Leek JT Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):414-32. PubMed ID: 16928955 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. RankProd 2.0: a refactored bioconductor package for detecting differentially expressed features in molecular profiling datasets. Del Carratore F; Jankevics A; Eisinga R; Heskes T; Hong F; Breitling R Bioinformatics; 2017 Sep; 33(17):2774-2775. PubMed ID: 28481966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multidimensional local false discovery rate for microarray studies. Ploner A; Calza S; Gusnanto A; Pawitan Y Bioinformatics; 2006 Mar; 22(5):556-65. PubMed ID: 16368770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. twilight; a Bioconductor package for estimating the local false discovery rate. Scheid S; Spang R Bioinformatics; 2005 Jun; 21(12):2921-2. PubMed ID: 15817688 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. goCluster integrates statistical analysis and functional interpretation of microarray expression data. Wrobel G; Chalmel F; Primig M Bioinformatics; 2005 Sep; 21(17):3575-7. PubMed ID: 16020468 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. mapDIA: Preprocessing and statistical analysis of quantitative proteomics data from data independent acquisition mass spectrometry. Teo G; Kim S; Tsou CC; Collins B; Gingras AC; Nesvizhskii AI; Choi H J Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 129():108-120. PubMed ID: 26381204 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Filtering for increased power for microarray data analysis. Hackstadt AJ; Hess AM BMC Bioinformatics; 2009 Jan; 10():11. PubMed ID: 19133141 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Identification of differentially expressed gene categories in microarray studies using nonparametric multivariate analysis. Nettleton D; Recknor J; Reecy JM Bioinformatics; 2008 Jan; 24(2):192-201. PubMed ID: 18042553 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]