179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23986676)
1. A standardized motor imagery introduction program (MIIP) for neuro-rehabilitation: development and evaluation.
Wondrusch C; Schuster-Amft C
Front Hum Neurosci; 2013; 7():477. PubMed ID: 23986676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A different point of view: the evaluation of motor imagery perspectives in patients with sensorimotor impairments in a longitudinal study.
Gäumann S; Gerber RS; Suica Z; Wandel J; Schuster-Amft C
BMC Neurol; 2021 Jul; 21(1):297. PubMed ID: 34315411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Two assessments to evaluate imagery ability: translation, test-retest reliability and concurrent validity of the German KVIQ and Imaprax.
Schuster C; Lussi A; Wirth B; Ettlin T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Aug; 12():127. PubMed ID: 22905778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Muscle Activation During Grasping With and Without Motor Imagery in Healthy Volunteers and Patients After Stroke or With Parkinson's Disease.
Kobelt M; Wirth B; Schuster-Amft C
Front Psychol; 2018; 9():597. PubMed ID: 29740377
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Specific and general adaptations following motor imagery practice focused on muscle strength in total knee arthroplasty rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial.
Paravlic AH; Pisot R; Marusic U
PLoS One; 2019; 14(8):e0221089. PubMed ID: 31412056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Combining motor imagery with action observation training does not lead to a greater autonomic nervous system response than motor imagery alone during simple and functional movements: a randomized controlled trial.
Cuenca-Martínez F; Suso-Martí L; Grande-Alonso M; Paris-Alemany A; La Touche R
PeerJ; 2018; 6():e5142. PubMed ID: 30002975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of motor imagery and effects of activating and relaxing practice on autonomic functions in healthy young adults: A randomised, controlled, assessor-blinded, pilot trial.
Kahraman T; Kaya DO; Isik T; Gultekin SC; Seebacher B
PLoS One; 2021; 16(7):e0254666. PubMed ID: 34255812
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: study protocol of a randomised controlled pilot trial using a mixed methods approach.
Schuster C; Butler J; Andrews B; Kischka U; Ettlin T
Trials; 2009 Oct; 10():97. PubMed ID: 19849835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of embedded and added motor imagery training in patients after stroke: results of a randomised controlled pilot trial.
Schuster C; Butler J; Andrews B; Kischka U; Ettlin T
Trials; 2012 Jan; 13():11. PubMed ID: 22269834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Motor imagery in stroke patients, or plegic patients with spinal cord or peripheral diseases.
Dettmers C; Benz M; Liepert J; Rockstroh B
Acta Neurol Scand; 2012 Oct; 126(4):238-47. PubMed ID: 22587653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The relation between cognitive and motor dysfunction and motor imagery ability in patients with multiple sclerosis.
Heremans E; D'hooge AM; De Bondt S; Helsen W; Feys P
Mult Scler; 2012 Sep; 18(9):1303-9. PubMed ID: 22389414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Motor imagery ability in patients with traumatic brain injury.
Oostra KM; Vereecke A; Jones K; Vanderstraeten G; Vingerhoets G
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2012 May; 93(5):828-33. PubMed ID: 22365480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Descriptive pilot study of vividness and temporal equivalence during motor imagery training after quadriplegia.
Mateo S; Reilly KT; Collet C; Rode G
Ann Phys Rehabil Med; 2018 Sep; 61(5):300-308. PubMed ID: 29944923
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. BCI-Based Control for Ankle Exoskeleton T-FLEX: Comparison of Visual and Haptic Stimuli with Stroke Survivors.
Barria P; Pino A; Tovar N; Gomez-Vargas D; Baleta K; Díaz CAR; Múnera M; Cifuentes CA
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Sep; 21(19):. PubMed ID: 34640750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The challenge of measuring physiological parameters during motor imagery engagement in patients after a stroke.
Gäumann S; Aksöz EA; Behrendt F; Wandel J; Cappelletti L; Krug A; Mörder D; Bill A; Parmar K; Gerth HU; Bonati LH; Schuster-Amft C
Front Neurosci; 2023; 17():1225440. PubMed ID: 37583419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of a single mental chronometry training session in subacute stroke patients - a randomized controlled trial.
Liepert J; Stürner J; Büsching I; Sehle A; Schoenfeld MA
BMC Sports Sci Med Rehabil; 2020; 12():66. PubMed ID: 33101692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nonlinear Analysis of Eye-Tracking Information for Motor Imagery Assessments.
Lanata A; Sebastiani L; Di Gruttola F; Di Modica S; Scilingo EP; Greco A
Front Neurosci; 2019; 13():1431. PubMed ID: 32009892
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Specific Brain Lesions Impair Explicit Motor Imagery Ability: A Systematic Review of the Evidence.
McInnes K; Friesen C; Boe S
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2016 Mar; 97(3):478-489.e1. PubMed ID: 26254950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The influence of imagery capacity in motor performance improvement.
Ruffino C; Papaxanthis C; Lebon F
Exp Brain Res; 2017 Oct; 235(10):3049-3057. PubMed ID: 28733754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study.
Prasad G; Herman P; Coyle D; McDonough S; Crosbie J
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2010 Dec; 7():60. PubMed ID: 21156054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
