205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23987097)
1. Why does gaze enhance mimicry? Placing gaze-mimicry effects in relation to other gaze phenomena.
Wang Y; Hamilton AF
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2014; 67(4):747-62. PubMed ID: 23987097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A direct link between gaze perception and social attention.
Bayliss AP; Bartlett J; Naughtin CK; Kritikos A
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):634-44. PubMed ID: 21038995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The mere perception of eye contact increases arousal during a word-spelling task.
Conty L; Russo M; Loehr V; Hugueville L; Barbu S; Huguet P; Tijus C; George N
Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(2):171-86. PubMed ID: 19823960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Talking heads or talking eyes? Effects of head orientation and sudden onset gaze cues on attention capture.
van der Wel RP; Welsh T; Böckler A
Atten Percept Psychophys; 2018 Jan; 80(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 29204867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Neural activity associated with attention orienting triggered by gaze cues: A study of lateralized ERPs.
Holmes A; Mogg K; Garcia LM; Bradley BP
Soc Neurosci; 2010; 5(3):285-95. PubMed ID: 20162493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Physical self-similarity enhances the gaze-cueing effect.
Hungr CJ; Hunt AR
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(7):1250-9. PubMed ID: 22670723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Eyes only? Perceiving eye contact is neither sufficient nor necessary for attentional capture by face direction.
Böckler A; van der Wel RP; Welsh TN
Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Sep; 160():134-40. PubMed ID: 26245915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sex differences for the recognition of direct versus averted gaze faces.
Goodman LR; Phelan HL; Johnson SA
Memory; 2012; 20(3):199-209. PubMed ID: 22292806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Eye gaze cannot be ignored (but neither can arrows).
Galfano G; Dalmaso M; Marzoli D; Pavan G; Coricelli C; Castelli L
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(10):1895-910. PubMed ID: 22512343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Social communication with virtual agents: The effects of body and gaze direction on attention and emotional responding in human observers.
Marschner L; Pannasch S; Schulz J; Graupner ST
Int J Psychophysiol; 2015 Aug; 97(2):85-92. PubMed ID: 26004021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pictorial gaze cues do not enhance long-tailed macaques' performance on a computerised object-location task.
Vick SJ; Toxopeus I; Anderson JR
Behav Processes; 2006 Nov; 73(3):308-14. PubMed ID: 16962253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Visuospatial attention shifts by gaze and arrow cues: an ERP study.
Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Nummenmaa L; Astikainen P
Brain Res; 2008 Jun; 1215():123-36. PubMed ID: 18485332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems.
Hietanen JK; Leppänen JM; Peltola MJ; Linna-Aho K; Ruuhiala HJ
Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(9):2423-30. PubMed ID: 18402988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Attentional orienting induced by arrows and eye-gaze compared with an endogenous cue.
Brignani D; Guzzon D; Marzi CA; Miniussi C
Neuropsychologia; 2009 Jan; 47(2):370-81. PubMed ID: 18926835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of head orientation on gaze perception: how positive congruency effects can be reversed.
Ricciardelli P; Driver J
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Mar; 61(3):491-504. PubMed ID: 17853198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relational property between head and eye regions is the primary determinant of the efficiency in search for a deviant gaze.
Doi H; Ueda K; Shinohara K
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Sep; 62(9):1723-37. PubMed ID: 19172532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Catching eyes: effects of social and nonsocial cues on attention capture.
Böckler A; van der Wel RP; Welsh TN
Psychol Sci; 2014 Mar; 25(3):720-7. PubMed ID: 24398595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The observer observed: frontal EEG asymmetry and autonomic responses differentiate between another person's direct and averted gaze when the face is seen live.
Pönkänen LM; Peltola MJ; Hietanen JK
Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Nov; 82(2):180-7. PubMed ID: 21893108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. When eye creates the contact! ERP evidence for early dissociation between direct and averted gaze motion processing.
Conty L; N'Diaye K; Tijus C; George N
Neuropsychologia; 2007 Oct; 45(13):3024-37. PubMed ID: 17644145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. How attentional systems process conflicting cues. The superiority of social over symbolic orienting revisited.
Nummenmaa L; Hietanen JK
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Dec; 35(6):1738-54. PubMed ID: 19968432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
