267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23987245)
21. Positive margin length and highest Gleason grade of tumor at the margin predict for biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer.
Chapin BF; Nguyen JN; Achim MF; Navai N; Williams SB; Prokhorova IN; Wang X; Tapia EMLN; Davis JW; Troncoso P
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2018 Jun; 21(2):221-227. PubMed ID: 29230008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. External validation of the UCSF-CAPRA (University of California, San Francisco, Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment) in Japanese patients receiving radical prostatectomy.
Ishizaki F; Hoque MA; Nishiyama T; Kawasaki T; Kasahara T; Hara N; Takizawa I; Saito T; Kitamura Y; Akazawa K; Takahashi K
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2011 Nov; 41(11):1259-64. PubMed ID: 21940731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy: What should we care about?
Pettenati C; Neuzillet Y; Radulescu C; Hervé JM; Molinié V; Lebret T
World J Urol; 2015 Dec; 33(12):1973-8. PubMed ID: 25939539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Positive surgical margins after minimally invasive radical prostatectomy in patients with pT2 and pT3a disease could be considered pathological upstaging.
Ouzzane A; Rozet F; Salas RS; Galiano M; Barret E; Prapotnich D; Cathelineau X
BJU Int; 2014 Apr; 113(4):586-91. PubMed ID: 23889763
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Do margins matter? The prognostic significance of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens.
Swindle P; Eastham JA; Ohori M; Kattan MW; Wheeler T; Maru N; Slawin K; Scardino PT
J Urol; 2005 Sep; 174(3):903-7. PubMed ID: 16093984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Favorable risk factors in patients with positive surgical margin after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.
Ha YS; Kang DI; Kim JH; Joung JY; Yu J; Parihar JS; Salmasi AH; Horie S; Kim WJ; Yi Kim I
Can J Urol; 2014 Jun; 21(3):7290-7. PubMed ID: 24978359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Adverse Pathologic Features at Radical Prostatectomy: Effect of Preoperative Risk on Oncologic Outcomes.
Imnadze M; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 25913389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Evaluation of biochemical recurrence-free survival after radical prostatectomy by cancer of the prostate risk assessment post-surgical (CAPRA-S) score.
Aktas BK; Ozden C; Bulut S; Tagci S; Erbay G; Gokkaya CS; Baykam MM; Memis A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2527-30. PubMed ID: 25824791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Primary Gleason grade 4 at the positive margin is associated with metastasis and death among patients with Gleason 7 prostate cancer undergoing radical prostatectomy.
Viers BR; Sukov WR; Gettman MT; Rangel LJ; Bergstralh EJ; Frank I; Tollefson MK; Thompson RH; Boorjian SA; Karnes RJ
Eur Urol; 2014 Dec; 66(6):1116-24. PubMed ID: 25052213
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk factors for biochemical recurrence after robotic assisted radical prostatectomy: a single surgeon experience.
Tanimoto R; Fashola Y; Scotland KB; Calvaresi AE; Gomella LG; Trabulsi EJ; Lallas CD
BMC Urol; 2015 Apr; 15():27. PubMed ID: 25879548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Influence of statin use on clinicopathological characteristics of localized prostate cancer and outcomes obtained after radical prostatectomy: a single center study.
Cattarino S; Seisen T; Drouin SJ; Renard-Penna R; Leon P; Comperat E; Mozer P; Cussenot O; Rouprêt M
Can J Urol; 2015 Apr; 22(2):7703-8. PubMed ID: 25891333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Predictive factors of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy for high-risk prostate cancer.
Murata Y; Tatsugami K; Yoshikawa M; Hamaguchi M; Yamada S; Hayakawa Y; Ueda K; Momosaki S; Sakamoto N
Int J Urol; 2018 Mar; 25(3):284-289. PubMed ID: 29315854
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Biochemical recurrence rate in patients with positive surgical margins at radical prostatectomy with further negative resected tissue.
Rabbani F; Vora KC; Yunis LH; Eastham JA; Guillonneau B; Scardino PT; Touijer K
BJU Int; 2009 Sep; 104(5):605-10. PubMed ID: 19689577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.
Faisal FA; Sundi D; Pierorazio PM; Ball MW; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Carter HB; Bivalacqua TJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E120-E129. PubMed ID: 24731026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Impact of Gleason score on biochemical recurrence in patients with pT3aN0/Nx prostate cancer with positive surgical margins: a multicenter study from the Prostate Cancer Research Committee.
Song W; Lee DH; Jeon HG; Jeong BC; Seo SI; Lee HM; Choi HY; Kim JW; Lee S; Byun SS; Jeong CW; Kwak C; Cho JS; Ahn H; Jeon SS
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2017 Nov; 143(11):2393-2400. PubMed ID: 28823006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Radical prostatectomy and positive surgical margins: relationship with prostate cancer outcome.
De La Roca RL; Da Cunha IW; Bezerra SM; Da Fonseca FP
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(3):306-15. PubMed ID: 25010296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The presence of positive surgical margins in patients with organ-confined prostate cancer results in biochemical recurrence at a similar rate to that in patients with extracapsular extension and PSA ≤ 10 ng/ml.
Eminaga O; Hinkelammert R; Titze U; Abbas M; Eltze E; Bettendorf O; Semjonow A
Urol Oncol; 2014 Jan; 32(1):32.e17-25. PubMed ID: 23434425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Propensity score comparison of the various radical surgical techniques for high-risk prostate cancer].
Busch J; Gonzalgo M; Leva N; Ferrari M; Friedersdorff F; Hinz S; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Magheli A
Aktuelle Urol; 2015 Jan; 46(1):45-51. PubMed ID: 25526221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Comparison of the Biochemical Recurrence risk between Radical Prostatectomy and Brachytherapy in the treatment of low- and intermediate-risk prostate cancer].
Martínez PF; Belisle DF; Cristallo C; Tobía I; Damia O; Villamil W; Giudice CR
Arch Esp Urol; 2015 Oct; 68(8):655-60. PubMed ID: 26437328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
