These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
22. Medical review organizations: a model state immunity statute. Kopit WG; Shapiro LE; Eaton KB Group Pract; 1980 Apr; 29(4):17-20. PubMed ID: 10273186 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. A second opinion on PROS. Weissenstein E Mod Healthc; 1994 May; 24(19):45-6, 48, 50. PubMed ID: 10133800 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. On changing relations with the PRO or belling the cat. Loschen DJ Nebr Med J; 1992 Jun; 77(6):119-20. PubMed ID: 1620264 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. PRO review: strategies for HMOs. Siegel SH; Albritton PM; Thornhill MC GHAA J; 1988; 9(1):14-21. PubMed ID: 10302958 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. The Health Security Act's quality management and oversight requirements. Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993 Dec-1994 Jan; 5(10):24-7. PubMed ID: 10131338 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. HCFA's close encounter with CQI. QRC Advis; 1992 May; 8(7):1-7. PubMed ID: 10118704 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. The role of the principal clinical coordinator in the Health Care Financing Administration's Health Care Quality Improvement Initiative. Elward KS; Martin D; Merwin E; Hayes RP; Ballard DJ Clin Perform Qual Health Care; 1994; 2(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 10161149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Implementation of the Peer Review Organization program. Grimaldi PL; Micheletti JA QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1984 Nov; 10(11):340-6. PubMed ID: 6441136 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I. Politser P Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Health reform and the quality assurance imperative. Webber A Qual Lett Healthc Lead; 1993 Dec-1994 Jan; 5(10):15-8. PubMed ID: 10131335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Peer review organizations: scientific challenges in HCFA's health care quality improvement initiative. Hayes RP; Lundberg MT; Ballard DJ Med Care Rev; 1994; 51(1):39-60. PubMed ID: 10133005 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Peer Review Organizations: the future agenda. A report of the American Medical Peer Review Association's Task Force on Peer Review Organization Implementation. Qual Assur Util Rev; 1986 Aug; 1(3):83-90. PubMed ID: 2980883 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Outcomes measurement--Part II. A profile of one organization's exploration of quality measurement and improvement. Lester JL Mich Med; 1994 Nov; 93(11):24-5. PubMed ID: 7815959 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Quality assurance and medical stupidity. Glover JL Am Surg; 1991 Aug; 57(8):475-80. PubMed ID: 1928988 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A patient care review model to suit both hospitals and PSROs. Thompson RE Hospitals; 1980 Aug; 54(16):61-3. PubMed ID: 7190542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The new PRO. Cobb AB J Miss State Med Assoc; 1993 Nov; 34(11):389-90. PubMed ID: 8283463 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Taking the PROs down a new road to quality. Interview by C. Burns Roehrig. Jencks SF Internist; 1992 Oct; 33(9):20-3. PubMed ID: 10121373 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. How to establish and use a review system to ensure quality nutritional care. Hagelshaw C Mich Hosp; 1981 Apr; 17(4):6-7, 9-11. PubMed ID: 10273254 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]