These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23988298)

  • 21. Characterization of uncertainty in estimation of methane collection from select U.S. landfills.
    Wang X; Nagpure AS; DeCarolis JF; Barlaz MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2015 Feb; 49(3):1545-51. PubMed ID: 25604252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating the methane generation rate constant (k value) of low-organic waste at Danish landfills.
    Mou Z; Scheutz C; Kjeldsen P
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():170-6. PubMed ID: 25453319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Development of a low-maintenance measurement approach to continuously estimate methane emissions: A case study.
    Riddick SN; Hancock BR; Robinson AD; Connors S; Davies S; Allen G; Pitt J; Harris NRP
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():210-219. PubMed ID: 28003116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Methodologies for measuring fugitive methane emissions from landfills - A review.
    Mønster J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2019 Mar; 87():835-859. PubMed ID: 30660403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Estimation of fugitive landfill methane emissions using surface emission monitoring and Genetic Algorithms optimization.
    Kormi T; Mhadhebi S; Bel Hadj Ali N; Abichou T; Green R
    Waste Manag; 2018 Feb; 72():313-328. PubMed ID: 27887773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Regional landfills methane emission inventory in Malaysia.
    Abushammala MF; Noor Ezlin Ahmad Basri ; Basri H; Ahmed Hussein El-Shafie ; Kadhum AA
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Aug; 29(8):863-73. PubMed ID: 20858637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Wet landfill decomposition rate determination using methane yield results for excavated waste samples.
    Kim H; Townsend TG
    Waste Manag; 2012 Jul; 32(7):1427-33. PubMed ID: 22516100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Estimation of waste component-specific landfill decay rates using laboratory-scale decomposition data.
    De la Cruz FB; Barlaz MA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2010 Jun; 44(12):4722-8. PubMed ID: 20496890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The influence of atmospheric pressure on landfill methane emissions.
    Czepiel PM; Shorter JH; Mosher B; Allwine E; McManus JB; Harriss RC; Kolb CE; Lamb BK
    Waste Manag; 2003; 23(7):593-8. PubMed ID: 12957154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Methane mass balance at three landfill sites: what is the efficiency of capture by gas collection systems?
    Spokas K; Bogner J; Chanton JP; Morcet M; Aran C; Graff C; Golvan YM; Hebe I
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(5):516-25. PubMed ID: 16198554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Translating landfill methane generation parameters among first-order decay models.
    Krause MJ; Chickering GW; Townsend TG
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2016 Nov; 66(11):1084-1097. PubMed ID: 27332778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Methane emissions from 20 landfills across the United States using vertical radial plume mapping.
    Goldsmith CD; Chanton J; Abichou T; Swan N; Green R; Haters G
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Feb; 62(2):183-97. PubMed ID: 22442934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Methane oxidation at a surface-sealed boreal landfill.
    Einola J; Sormunen K; Lensu A; Leiskallio A; Ettala M; Rintala J
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jul; 29(7):2105-20. PubMed ID: 19264471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of a simple model to predict the performance of methane oxidation systems, using field data from a large scale biocover test field.
    Geck C; Scharff H; Pfeiffer EM; Gebert J
    Waste Manag; 2016 Oct; 56():280-9. PubMed ID: 27426022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. [Uncertainty analysis for evaluating methane emissions from municipal solid waste landfill in Beijing].
    Chen CC; Liu CL; Li Z; Wang HH; Zhang Y; Wang L
    Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2012 Jan; 33(1):208-15. PubMed ID: 22452212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Quantification of methane emissions from 15 Danish landfills using the mobile tracer dispersion method.
    Mønster J; Samuelsson J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2015 Jan; 35():177-86. PubMed ID: 25442105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Determination of gas recovery efficiency at two Danish landfills by performing downwind methane measurements and stable carbon isotopic analysis.
    Aghdam EF; Fredenslund AM; Chanton J; Kjeldsen P; Scheutz C
    Waste Manag; 2018 Mar; 73():220-229. PubMed ID: 29249311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of landfill gas decay constant for municipal solid waste landfills operated as bioreactors.
    Tolaymat TM; Green RB; Hater GR; Barlaz MA; Black P; Bronson D; Powell J
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2010 Jan; 60(1):91-7. PubMed ID: 20102038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Spatial variability of nitrous oxide and methane emissions from an MBT landfill in operation: strong N2O hotspots at the working face.
    Harborth P; Fuss R; Münnich K; Flessa H; Fricke K
    Waste Manag; 2013 Oct; 33(10):2099-107. PubMed ID: 23453435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Assessment of methane emissions and energy recovery potential from the municipal solid waste landfills of Delhi, India.
    Ghosh P; Shah G; Chandra R; Sahota S; Kumar H; Vijay VK; Thakur IS
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Jan; 272():611-615. PubMed ID: 30385029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.