These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23988298)

  • 41. Assessing methods to estimate emissions of non-methane organic compounds from landfills.
    Saquing JM; Chanton JP; Yazdani R; Barlaz MA; Scheutz C; Blake DR; Imhoff PT
    Waste Manag; 2014 Nov; 34(11):2260-70. PubMed ID: 25108756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Determination of waste decay rate for a large Finnish landfill by calibrating methane generation models on the basis of methane recovery and emissions.
    Sormunen K; Laurila T; Rintala J
    Waste Manag Res; 2013 Oct; 31(10):979-85. PubMed ID: 23797297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of biogas generation on radon emissions from landfills receiving radium-bearing waste from shale gas development.
    Walter GR; Benke RR; Pickett DA
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2012 Sep; 62(9):1040-9. PubMed ID: 23019818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Gas emissions from biodegradable waste in United Kingdom landfills.
    Donovan SM; Jilang Pan ; Bateson T; Gronow JR; Voulvoulis N
    Waste Manag Res; 2011 Jan; 29(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 21088129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Approaches to assess biocover performance on landfills.
    Huber-Humer M; Röder S; Lechner P
    Waste Manag; 2009 Jul; 29(7):2092-104. PubMed ID: 19282167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Scaling methane oxidation: from laboratory incubation experiments to landfill cover field conditions.
    Abichou T; Mahieu K; Chanton J; Romdhane M; Mansouri I
    Waste Manag; 2011 May; 31(5):978-86. PubMed ID: 21196106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Improved methodology to assess modification and completion of landfill gas management in the aftercare period.
    Morris JW; Crest M; Barlaz MA; Spokas KA; Kerman A; Yuan L
    Waste Manag; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2364-73. PubMed ID: 22884579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Accuracy of vertical radial plume mapping technique in measuring lagoon gas emissions.
    Viguria M; Ro KS; Stone KC; Johnson MH
    J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2015 Apr; 65(4):395-403. PubMed ID: 25947209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessing the performance of gas collection systems in select Chinese landfills according to the LandGEM model: drawbacks and potential direction.
    Sun Y; Yue D; Li R; Yang T; Liu S
    Environ Technol; 2015; 36(23):2912-8. PubMed ID: 26510610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Prediction of greenhouse gas emissions from Ontario's solid waste landfills using fuzzy logic based model.
    Mohsen RA; Abbassi B
    Waste Manag; 2020 Feb; 102():743-750. PubMed ID: 31805447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Design of top covers supporting aerobic in situ stabilization of old landfills--an experimental simulation in lysimeters.
    Hrad M; Huber-Humer M; Wimmer B; Reichenauer TG
    Waste Manag; 2012 Dec; 32(12):2324-35. PubMed ID: 22749719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Methane flux and oxidation at two types of intermediate landfill covers.
    Abichou T; Chanton J; Powelson D; Fleiger J; Escoriaza S; Lei Y; Stern J
    Waste Manag; 2006; 26(11):1305-12. PubMed ID: 16426833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Methods for determining the methane generation potential and methane generation rate constant for the FOD model: a review.
    Park JK; Chong YG; Tameda K; Lee NH
    Waste Manag Res; 2018 Mar; 36(3):200-220. PubMed ID: 29415628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Methane distribution surrounding closed landfill sites in China.
    Zhang CX; Zhang ZN; Wang YX; Mebra O
    Environ Technol; 2012 Sep; 33(16-18):2159-66. PubMed ID: 23240211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Environmental assessment of gas management options at the Old Ammässuo landfill (Finland) by means of LCA-modeling (EASEWASTE).
    Manfredi S; Niskanen A; Christensen TH
    Waste Manag; 2009 May; 29(5):1588-94. PubMed ID: 19081238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Evaluation of optimal model parameters for prediction of methane generation from selected U.S. landfills.
    Sun W; Wang X; DeCarolis JF; Barlaz MA
    Waste Manag; 2019 May; 91():120-127. PubMed ID: 31203933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Estimates of methane emissions and comparison with gas mass burned in CDM action in a large landfill in Eastern Amazon.
    Imbiriba BCO; Ramos JRS; de Sousa Silva R; Cattanio JH; do Couto LL; Mitschein TA
    Waste Manag; 2020 Jan; 101():28-34. PubMed ID: 31586874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Mitigating methane emissions and air intrusion in heterogeneous landfills with a high permeability layer.
    Jung Y; Imhoff PT; Augenstein D; Yazdani R
    Waste Manag; 2011 May; 31(5):1049-58. PubMed ID: 20880688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Assessment of the methane oxidation capacity of compacted soils intended for use as landfill cover materials.
    Rachor I; Gebert J; Gröngröft A; Pfeiffer EM
    Waste Manag; 2011 May; 31(5):833-42. PubMed ID: 21067907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. A decision support tool for landfill methane generation and gas collection.
    Emkes H; Coulon F; Wagland S
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():307-18. PubMed ID: 26168873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.