286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23988483)
1. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
Gervaise A; Osemont B; Louis M; Lecocq S; Teixeira P; Blum A
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23988483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
Onishi H; Kockelkoren R; Kim T; Hori M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Uranishi A; Tanaka T; Taniguchi A; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.
Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Muse VV; Kambadakone AR; Blake MA; Tabari A; Hoi Y; Akino N; Angel E; Madan R; Kalra MK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 31967501
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Diagnostic Performance and Dose Comparison of Filtered Back Projection and Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-dimensional CT Enterography in Children and Young Adults.
Wallihan DB; Podberesky DJ; Sullivan J; Denson LA; Zhang B; Salisbury SR; Towbin AJ
Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):233-42. PubMed ID: 25654668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction.
van der Molen AJ; Miclea RL; Geleijns J; Joemai RM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 26295643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ultralow-Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography: Comparison of 2 Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in a Prospective Clinical Study.
Khawaja RD; Singh S; Blake M; Harisinghani M; Choy G; Karaosmanoglu A; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Do S; Kalra MK
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 26182223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dose reduction in computed tomography of the chest: image quality of iterative reconstructions at a 50% radiation dose compared to filtered back projection at a 100% radiation dose.
May MS; Eller A; Stahl C; Wuest W; Scharf M; Hammon M; Dankerl P; Schlechtweg PM; Allmendinger T; Sedlmair M; Schmidt B; Uder M; Lell MM
Rofo; 2014 Jun; 186(6):576-84. PubMed ID: 24477504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional Reconstructions.
Mello-Amoedo CD; Martins AN; Tachibana A; Pinho DF; Baroni RH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):127-133. PubMed ID: 29140117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) in MDCT Below 2 mSv for the Detection of Urinary Calculi: Diagnostic Accuracy and Image Quality in Comparison to Filtered Back-Projection and 4th Generation Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4).
Schmidt-Holtz J; Laqmani A; Butscheidt S; Kurfürst M; Avanesov M; Behzadi C; Spink C; Veldhoen S; Nagel HD; Adam G; Regier M
Rofo; 2018 Jul; 190(7):630-636. PubMed ID: 29966156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) vs. filtered back projection: radiation dose reduction capabilities of wide volume and helical scanning techniques on area-detector CT in a chest phantom study.
Seki S; Koyama H; Ohno Y; Matsumoto S; Inokawa H; Sugihara N; Sugimura K
Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 26339037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Optimizing image quality for pediatric torso computed tomography: the use of advanced iterative reconstruction and wide-detector scanning techniques.
Buchmann RF; Bruce Greenberg S
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):786-9. PubMed ID: 24943252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reducing the dose of CT of the paranasal sinuses: potential of an iterative reconstruction algorithm.
Schaafs LA; Lenk J; Hamm B; Niehues SM
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160127. PubMed ID: 27351346
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effects of reconstruction technique on the quality of abdominal CT angiography: A comparison between forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and conventional reconstruction methods.
Wu R; Hori M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Fukui H; Ota T; Nishida T; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():100-105. PubMed ID: 30150030
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
