These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

286 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23988483)

  • 1. Standard dose versus low-dose abdominal and pelvic CT: comparison between filtered back projection versus adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D.
    Gervaise A; Osemont B; Louis M; Lecocq S; Teixeira P; Blum A
    Diagn Interv Imaging; 2014 Jan; 95(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 23988483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of adaptive iterative dose reduction (AIDR) 3D on low-dose abdominal CT: comparison with routine-dose CT using filtered back projection.
    Matsuki M; Murakami T; Juri H; Yoshikawa S; Narumi Y
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Oct; 54(8):869-75. PubMed ID: 23761554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dose reduction in chest CT: comparison of the adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D, adaptive iterative dose reduction, and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques.
    Yamada Y; Jinzaki M; Hosokawa T; Tanami Y; Sugiura H; Abe T; Kuribayashi S
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Dec; 81(12):4185-95. PubMed ID: 22883532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Performance of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D integrated with automatic tube current modulation in radiation dose and image noise reduction compared with filtered-back projection for 80-kVp abdominal CT: Anthropomorphic phantom and patient study.
    Chen CM; Lin YY; Hsu MY; Hung CF; Liao YL; Tsai HY
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1666-72. PubMed ID: 27501904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Low-Dose Pelvic Computed Tomography Using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction 3-Dimensional Algorithm: A Phantom Study.
    Onishi H; Kockelkoren R; Kim T; Hori M; Nakamoto A; Tsuboyama T; Sakane M; Tatsumi M; Uranishi A; Tanaka T; Taniguchi A; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):629-34. PubMed ID: 26125298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Image Quality and Lesion Detection on Deep Learning Reconstruction and Iterative Reconstruction of Submillisievert Chest and Abdominal CT.
    Singh R; Digumarthy SR; Muse VV; Kambadakone AR; Blake MA; Tabari A; Hoi Y; Akino N; Angel E; Madan R; Kalra MK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Mar; 214(3):566-573. PubMed ID: 31967501
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients.
    Vardhanabhuti V; Riordan RD; Mitchell GR; Hyde C; Roobottom CA
    Invest Radiol; 2014 Apr; 49(4):209-16. PubMed ID: 24368613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Diagnostic Performance and Dose Comparison of Filtered Back Projection and Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction Three-dimensional CT Enterography in Children and Young Adults.
    Wallihan DB; Podberesky DJ; Sullivan J; Denson LA; Zhang B; Salisbury SR; Towbin AJ
    Radiology; 2015 Jul; 276(1):233-42. PubMed ID: 25654668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Survey of Radiation Doses in CT Urography Before and After Implementation of Iterative Reconstruction.
    van der Molen AJ; Miclea RL; Geleijns J; Joemai RM
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2015 Sep; 205(3):572-7. PubMed ID: 26295643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ultralow-Dose Abdominal Computed Tomography: Comparison of 2 Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in a Prospective Clinical Study.
    Khawaja RD; Singh S; Blake M; Harisinghani M; Choy G; Karaosmanoglu A; Padole A; Pourjabbar S; Do S; Kalra MK
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(4):489-98. PubMed ID: 26182223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques with conventional filtered back projection: dose reduction potential in the abdomen.
    Singh S; Kalra MK; Do S; Thibault JB; Pien H; O'Connor OJ; Blake MA
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2012; 36(3):347-53. PubMed ID: 22592622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dose reduction in computed tomography of the chest: image quality of iterative reconstructions at a 50% radiation dose compared to filtered back projection at a 100% radiation dose.
    May MS; Eller A; Stahl C; Wuest W; Scharf M; Hammon M; Dankerl P; Schlechtweg PM; Allmendinger T; Sedlmair M; Schmidt B; Uder M; Lell MM
    Rofo; 2014 Jun; 186(6):576-84. PubMed ID: 24477504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of Radiation Dose and Image Quality of Abdominopelvic CT Using Iterative (AIDR 3D) and Conventional Reconstructions.
    Mello-Amoedo CD; Martins AN; Tachibana A; Pinho DF; Baroni RH
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):127-133. PubMed ID: 29140117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Ultra-low-dose CT of the lung: effect of iterative reconstruction techniques on image quality.
    Yanagawa M; Gyobu T; Leung AN; Kawai M; Kawata Y; Sumikawa H; Honda O; Tomiyama N
    Acad Radiol; 2014 Jun; 21(6):695-703. PubMed ID: 24713541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Iterative Model Reconstruction (IMR) in MDCT Below 2 mSv for the Detection of Urinary Calculi: Diagnostic Accuracy and Image Quality in Comparison to Filtered Back-Projection and 4th Generation Iterative Reconstruction (iDose4).
    Schmidt-Holtz J; Laqmani A; Butscheidt S; Kurfürst M; Avanesov M; Behzadi C; Spink C; Veldhoen S; Nagel HD; Adam G; Regier M
    Rofo; 2018 Jul; 190(7):630-636. PubMed ID: 29966156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D) vs. filtered back projection: radiation dose reduction capabilities of wide volume and helical scanning techniques on area-detector CT in a chest phantom study.
    Seki S; Koyama H; Ohno Y; Matsumoto S; Inokawa H; Sugihara N; Sugimura K
    Acta Radiol; 2016 Jun; 57(6):684-90. PubMed ID: 26339037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Optimizing image quality for pediatric torso computed tomography: the use of advanced iterative reconstruction and wide-detector scanning techniques.
    Buchmann RF; Bruce Greenberg S
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2014; 38(5):786-9. PubMed ID: 24943252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reducing the dose of CT of the paranasal sinuses: potential of an iterative reconstruction algorithm.
    Schaafs LA; Lenk J; Hamm B; Niehues SM
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160127. PubMed ID: 27351346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Abdominal CT: comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients.
    Sagara Y; Hara AK; Pavlicek W; Silva AC; Paden RG; Wu Q
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Sep; 195(3):713-9. PubMed ID: 20729451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of reconstruction technique on the quality of abdominal CT angiography: A comparison between forward projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and conventional reconstruction methods.
    Wu R; Hori M; Onishi H; Nakamoto A; Fukui H; Ota T; Nishida T; Enchi Y; Satoh K; Tomiyama N
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Sep; 106():100-105. PubMed ID: 30150030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.