These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23990526)

  • 1. Could standardizing "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitors to the DICOM part 14: GSDF improve the presentation of dental images? A visual grading characteristics analysis.
    McIlgorm DJ; Lawinski C; Ng S; McNulty JP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2013; 42(9):20130121. PubMed ID: 23990526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated medical grade monitor vs a DICOM part 14: GSDF-calibrated "commercial off-the-shelf" (COTS) monitor for viewing 8-bit dental images.
    McIlgorm DJ; McNulty JP
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(3):20140148. PubMed ID: 25421807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality of 'commercial-off-the-shelf' (COTS) monitors displaying dental radiographs.
    McIlgorm DJ; Lawinski C; Ng S; McNulty JP
    Br Dent J; 2013 Dec; 215(11):E22. PubMed ID: 24309815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Psychophysical evaluation of calibration curve for diagnostic LCD monitor.
    Uemura M; Asai Y; Yamaguchi M; Fujita H; Shintani Y; Sanada S
    Radiat Med; 2006 Dec; 24(10):653-8. PubMed ID: 17186319
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of grey-scale standard display function as a calibration tool for diagnostic liquid crystal display monitors using psychophysical analysis.
    Asai Y; Shintani Y; Yamaguchi M; Uemura M; Matsumoto M; Kanamori H
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2005 May; 43(3):319-24. PubMed ID: 16035218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic Accuracy of Caries and Periapical Lesions on a Monitor with and without DICOM-GSDF Calibration Under Different Ambient Light Conditions.
    Freire RT; Prata-Júnior AR; Pinho JNA; Takeshita WM
    J Digit Imaging; 2022 Jun; 35(3):654-659. PubMed ID: 35166971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SoftCopy Display Quality Assurance Program at Texas Children's Hospital.
    Ly CK
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():33-40. PubMed ID: 12105695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of display performance for medical imaging systems: executive summary of AAPM TG18 report.
    Samei E; Badano A; Chakraborty D; Compton K; Cornelius C; Corrigan K; Flynn MJ; Hemminger B; Hangiandreou N; Johnson J; Moxley-Stevens DM; Pavlicek W; Roehrig H; Rutz L; Shepard J; Uzenoff RA; Wang J; Willis CE;
    Med Phys; 2005 Apr; 32(4):1205-25. PubMed ID: 15895604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Verification of DICOM GSDF in complex backgrounds.
    Leong DL; Rainford L; Haygood TM; Whitman GJ; Tchou PM; Geiser WR; Carkaci S; Brennan PC
    J Digit Imaging; 2012 Oct; 25(5):662-9. PubMed ID: 22535193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Implementing the DICOM Grayscale Standard Display Function for mixed hard- and soft-copy operations.
    Thompson SK; Willis CE; Krugh KT; Jeff Shepard S; McEnery KW
    J Digit Imaging; 2002; 15 Suppl 1():27-32. PubMed ID: 12105694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effect of display type and room illuminance in chest radiographs.
    Liukkonen E; Jartti A; Haapea M; Oikarinen H; Ahvenjärvi L; Mattila S; Nevala T; Palosaari K; Perhomaa M; Nieminen MT
    Eur Radiol; 2016 Sep; 26(9):3171-9. PubMed ID: 26662032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A practical approach to soft-copy display consistency for PC-based review workstations.
    Jervis SE; Brettle DS
    Br J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 76(909):648-52. PubMed ID: 14500280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Image presentation in digital radiology: perspectives on the emerging DICOM display function standard and its application.
    Blume H; Hemminger BM
    Radiographics; 1997; 17(3):769-77. PubMed ID: 9153711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Toward clinically relevant standardization of image quality.
    Samei E; Rowberg A; Avraham E; Cornelius C
    J Digit Imaging; 2004 Dec; 17(4):271-8. PubMed ID: 15551103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A brief review of human perception factors in digital displays for picture archiving and communications systems.
    Wang J; Langer S
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Nov; 10(4):158-68. PubMed ID: 9399169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of monitors on approximal caries detection in digital radiographs--standard versus precalibrated DICOM part 14 displays: an in vitro study.
    Hellén-Halme K; Nilsson M; Petersson A
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 May; 107(5):716-20. PubMed ID: 19201219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Introduction to grayscale calibration and related aspects of medical imaging grade liquid crystal displays.
    Fetterly KA; Blume HR; Flynn MJ; Samei E
    J Digit Imaging; 2008 Jun; 21(2):193-207. PubMed ID: 17333412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital display monitor performance in general dental practice.
    Butt A; Savage NW
    Aust Dent J; 2015 Jun; 60(2):240-6. PubMed ID: 25990614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Image quality assurance of soft copy display systems.
    Seto E; Ursani A; Cafazzo JA; Rossos PG; Easty AC
    J Digit Imaging; 2005 Dec; 18(4):280-6. PubMed ID: 15988625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Use and implication of the DICOM standard in dentistry.
    Farman AG
    Dent Clin North Am; 2002 Jul; 46(3):565-73, vii. PubMed ID: 12222098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.