BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

223 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23991008)

  • 1. Impedance and electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) drop within 24 hours after cochlear implantation.
    Chen JK; Chuang AY; Sprinzl GM; Tung TH; Li LP
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(8):e71929. PubMed ID: 23991008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) in cochlear implant children: Changes in auditory nerve response in first year of cochlear implant use.
    Telmesani LM; Said NM
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Mar; 82():28-33. PubMed ID: 26857311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Across-site patterns of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude-growth functions in multichannel cochlear implant recipients and the effects of the interphase gap.
    Schvartz-Leyzac KC; Pfingst BE
    Hear Res; 2016 Nov; 341():50-65. PubMed ID: 27521841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) Measurements in Traditional and Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation.
    Nassiri AM; Yawn RJ; Gifford RH; Haynes DS; Roberts JB; Gilbane MS; Murfee J; Bennett ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(10):918-926. PubMed ID: 31274070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of long-term use of a cochlear implant on the electrically evoked compound action potential.
    Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Etlert CP; O'Brient S; Oleson JJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Jan; 21(1):5-15. PubMed ID: 20085195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cochlear implantees: Analysis of behavioral and objective measures for a clinical population of various age groups.
    Greisiger R; Shallop JK; Hol PK; Elle OJ; Jablonski GE
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015; 16 Suppl 4():1-19. PubMed ID: 26642899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the association of electrically-evoked compound action potential thresholds with inner-ear dimensions in pediatric cochlear implantation.
    Söderqvist S; Sivonen V; Lamminmäki S; Ylönen J; Markkola A; Sinkkonen ST
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2022 Jul; 158():111160. PubMed ID: 35544967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Delayed changes in auditory status in cochlear implant users with preserved acoustic hearing.
    Scheperle RA; Tejani VD; Omtvedt JK; Brown CJ; Abbas PJ; Hansen MR; Gantz BJ; Oleson JJ; Ozanne MV
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():45-57. PubMed ID: 28432874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Insertion trauma and recovery of function after cochlear implantation: Evidence from objective functional measures.
    Pfingst BE; Hughes AP; Colesa DJ; Watts MM; Strahl SB; Raphael Y
    Hear Res; 2015 Dec; 330(Pt A):98-105. PubMed ID: 26209185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Electrically evoked compound action potentials are different depending on the site of cochlear stimulation.
    van de Heyning P; Arauz SL; Atlas M; Baumgartner WD; Caversaccio M; Chester-Browne R; Estienne P; Gavilan J; Godey B; Gstöttner W; Han D; Hagen R; Kompis M; Kuzovkov V; Lassaletta L; Lefevre F; Li Y; Müller J; Parnes L; Kleine Punte A; Raine C; Rajan G; Rivas A; Rivas JA; Royle N; Sprinzl G; Stephan K; Walkowiak A; Yanov Y; Zimmermann K; Zorowka P; Skarzynski H
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2016 Nov; 17(6):251-262. PubMed ID: 27900916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wang Y; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
    Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The relation between auditory-nerve temporal responses and perceptual rate integration in cochlear implants.
    Hughes ML; Baudhuin JL; Goehring JL
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():44-56. PubMed ID: 25093283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of congenital inner ear malformations (IEMs) on electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) responses in cochlear implant children.
    Said NM; Telmesani LS; Telmesani LM
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Dec; 280(12):5193-5204. PubMed ID: 37606729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs.
    Ramekers D; Benav H; Klis SFL; Versnel H
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):721-738. PubMed ID: 35948695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differences in the impedance of cochlear implant devices within 24 hours of their implantation.
    Lin DP; Chen JK; Tung TH; Li LP
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(9):e0222711. PubMed ID: 31536550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Characteristics of responsiveness of cochlear nerve to electrical stimulation in patients with cochlear nerve deficiency].
    Chao XH; Luo JF; Wang RJ; Fan ZM; Wang HB; Xu L
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2023 Jul; 58(7):657-665. PubMed ID: 37455110
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Objective, audiological and quality of life measures with the CI532 slim modiolar electrode.
    Hey M; Wesarg T; Mewes A; Helbig S; Hornung J; Lenarz T; Briggs R; Marx M; Ramos A; Stöver T; Escudé B; James CJ; Aschendorff A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2019 Mar; 20(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 30465637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.