These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23991578)

  • 1. [Perception of facial profile attractiveness of lower anterior face height in orthodontic treatment seeking people].
    Pham M; Wang Y; Wang W; Zhou C; Guo C; Bao B
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2013 Aug; 31(4):385-8. PubMed ID: 23991578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Investigation on profile self-perception of lower anterior facial height by patients seeking orthodontic treatment].
    Wang YY; Bao BC; Xie Q; Hao CB
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2020 Feb; 29(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 32524123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. How does variation in lower anterior face height influence perceived attractiveness? A quantitative investigation.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    J Orthod; 2013 Sep; 40(3):206-17. PubMed ID: 24009320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
    Johnston DJ; Hunt O; Johnston CD; Burden DJ; Stevenson M; Hepper P
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):349-54. PubMed ID: 15961569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Vertical facial height and proportions of face in Hausa - Fulani children in Northern Nigeria.
    Utomi IL
    Niger Postgrad Med J; 2004 Mar; 11(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 15254569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variation in maxillary and mandibular molar and incisor vertical dimension in 12-year-old subjects with excess, normal, and short lower anterior face height.
    Janson GR; Metaxas A; Woodside DG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Oct; 106(4):409-18. PubMed ID: 7942657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
    Abu Arqoub SH; Al-Khateeb SN
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Feb; 33(1):103-11. PubMed ID: 20558590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Facial balance and harmony: an attainable objective for the patient with a high mandibular plane angle.
    Klontz HA
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Aug; 114(2):176-88. PubMed ID: 9714283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of increasing occlusal vertical dimension on face height.
    Gross MD; Nissan J; Ormianer Z; Dvori S; Shifman A
    Int J Prosthodont; 2002; 15(4):353-7. PubMed ID: 12170849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of chin height on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, layperson, and clinician.
    Naini FB; Donaldson AN; McDonald F; Cobourne MT
    Angle Orthod; 2012 Jan; 82(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 21787197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Proportions in the upper lip-lower lip-chin area of the lower face as determined by photogrammetric method.
    Anic-Milosevic S; Mestrovic S; Prlić A; Slaj M
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Mar; 38(2):90-5. PubMed ID: 19447641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Vertical proportions of face: a cephalometric study.
    Kharbanda OP; Sidhu SS; Sundrum KR
    Int J Orthod; 1991; 29(3-4):6-8. PubMed ID: 1802874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Facially generated occlusal vertical dimension.
    Mack MR
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 1997 Dec; 18(12):1183-6, 1188, 1190 passim; quiz 119. PubMed ID: 9656843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Association of facial sagittal and vertical characteristics with facial aesthetics in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966.
    Krooks L; Pirttiniemi P; Tolvanen M; Kanavakis G; Lähdesmäki R; Silvola AS
    Eur J Orthod; 2019 May; 41(3):279-285. PubMed ID: 30215708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The measurement of anterior and posterior facial heights in a Nigerian population.
    Isiekwe M
    Afr Dent J; 1994; 8():1-6. PubMed ID: 9590879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Ranking facial attractiveness.
    Knight H; Keith O
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Aug; 27(4):340-8. PubMed ID: 16043472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Objective assessment of the contribution of dental esthetics and facial attractiveness in men via eye tracking.
    Baker RS; Fields HW; Beck FM; Firestone AR; Rosenstiel SF
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Apr; 153(4):523-533. PubMed ID: 29602344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The perception of facial aesthetics in a young Spanish population.
    Macías Gago AB; Romero Maroto M; Crego A
    Eur J Orthod; 2012 Jun; 34(3):335-9. PubMed ID: 21447783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between masseter muscle size and maxillary morphology.
    Uchida Y; Motoyoshi M; Shigeeda T; Shinohara A; Igarashi Y; Sakaguchi M; Shimizu N
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Dec; 33(6):654-9. PubMed ID: 21262936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
    Maple JR; Vig KW; Beck FM; Larsen PE; Shanker S
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Dec; 128(6):690-6; quiz 801. PubMed ID: 16360907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.