336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23991605)
1. Clinical applications of diffusion-weighted-MRI in prostate cancer.
Wibulpolprasert P; Phongkitkarun S; Chalermsanyakorn P
J Med Assoc Thai; 2013 Aug; 96(8):967-75. PubMed ID: 23991605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.
Hambrock T; Somford DM; Huisman HJ; van Oort IM; Witjes JA; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Scheenen T; Barentsz JO
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 21502392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diffusion-weighted MRI of peripheral zone prostate cancer: comparison of tumor apparent diffusion coefficient with Gleason score and percentage of tumor on core biopsy.
Woodfield CA; Tung GA; Grand DJ; Pezzullo JA; Machan JT; Renzulli JF
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Apr; 194(4):W316-22. PubMed ID: 20308476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.
Kang Y; Choi SH; Kim YJ; Kim KG; Sohn CH; Kim JH; Yun TJ; Chang KH
Radiology; 2011 Dec; 261(3):882-90. PubMed ID: 21969667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of aggressiveness of prostate cancer: correlation of apparent diffusion coefficient with histologic grade after radical prostatectomy.
Verma S; Rajesh A; Morales H; Lemen L; Bills G; Delworth M; Gaitonde K; Ying J; Samartunga R; Lamba M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Feb; 196(2):374-81. PubMed ID: 21257890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer.
Rosenkrantz AB; Sigmund EE; Johnson G; Babb JS; Mussi TC; Melamed J; Taneja SS; Lee VS; Jensen JH
Radiology; 2012 Jul; 264(1):126-35. PubMed ID: 22550312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peritumoral brain regions in gliomas and meningiomas: investigation with isotropic diffusion-weighted MR imaging and diffusion-tensor MR imaging.
Provenzale JM; McGraw P; Mhatre P; Guo AC; Delong D
Radiology; 2004 Aug; 232(2):451-60. PubMed ID: 15215555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluation of Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging Versus Standard Diffusion Imaging for Detection and Grading of Peripheral Zone Prostate Cancer.
Roethke MC; Kuder TA; Kuru TH; Fenchel M; Hadaschik BA; Laun FB; Schlemmer HP; Stieltjes B
Invest Radiol; 2015 Aug; 50(8):483-9. PubMed ID: 25867657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Apparent diffusion coefficient for prostate cancer imaging: impact of B values.
Peng Y; Jiang Y; Antic T; Sethi I; Schmid-Tannwald C; Eggener S; Oto A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Mar; 202(3):W247-53. PubMed ID: 24555621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prostate cancer: identification with combined diffusion-weighted MR imaging and 3D 1H MR spectroscopic imaging--correlation with pathologic findings.
Mazaheri Y; Shukla-Dave A; Hricak H; Fine SW; Zhang J; Inurrigarro G; Moskowitz CS; Ishill NM; Reuter VE; Touijer K; Zakian KL; Koutcher JA
Radiology; 2008 Feb; 246(2):480-8. PubMed ID: 18227542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Utility of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient in detection of prostate cancer and prediction of pathologic Gleason score].
Kagebayashi Y; Nakai Y; Matsumoto Y; Samma S; Miyasaka T; Nakagawa H
Hinyokika Kiyo; 2012 Aug; 58(8):405-8. PubMed ID: 23052263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Grading astrocytic tumors by using apparent diffusion coefficient parameters: superiority of a one- versus two-parameter pilot method.
Murakami R; Hirai T; Sugahara T; Fukuoka H; Toya R; Nishimura S; Kitajima M; Okuda T; Nakamura H; Oya N; Kuratsu J; Yamashita Y
Radiology; 2009 Jun; 251(3):838-45. PubMed ID: 19318585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Apparent diffusion coefficient values in peripheral and transition zones of the prostate: comparison between normal and malignant prostatic tissues and correlation with histologic grade.
Tamada T; Sone T; Jo Y; Toshimitsu S; Yamashita T; Yamamoto A; Tanimoto D; Ito K
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2008 Sep; 28(3):720-6. PubMed ID: 18777532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2.
Kim CK; Park BK; Kim B
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Jan; 194(1):W33-7. PubMed ID: 20028888
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiation of prostatitis and prostate cancer by using diffusion-weighted MR imaging and MR-guided biopsy at 3 T.
Nagel KN; Schouten MG; Hambrock T; Litjens GJ; Hoeks CM; ten Haken B; Barentsz JO; Fütterer JJ
Radiology; 2013 Apr; 267(1):164-72. PubMed ID: 23329653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate cancer: comparison of tumor visibility on trace diffusion-weighted images and the apparent diffusion coefficient map.
Rosenkrantz AB; Kong X; Niver BE; Berkman DS; Melamed J; Babb JS; Taneja SS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2011 Jan; 196(1):123-9. PubMed ID: 21178056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Malignant astrocytic tumors: clinical importance of apparent diffusion coefficient in prediction of grade and prognosis.
Higano S; Yun X; Kumabe T; Watanabe M; Mugikura S; Umetsu A; Sato A; Yamada T; Takahashi S
Radiology; 2006 Dec; 241(3):839-46. PubMed ID: 17032910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Initial experience with identifying high-grade prostate cancer using diffusion-weighted MR imaging (DWI) in patients with a Gleason score ≤ 3 + 3 = 6 upon schematic TRUS-guided biopsy: a radical prostatectomy correlated series.
Somford DM; Hambrock T; Hulsbergen-van de Kaa CA; Fütterer JJ; van Oort IM; van Basten JP; Karthaus HF; Witjes JA; Barentsz JO
Invest Radiol; 2012 Mar; 47(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 22293513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Diffusion-weighted MRI in renal cell carcinoma: a surrogate marker for predicting nuclear grade and histological subtype.
Goyal A; Sharma R; Bhalla AS; Gamanagatti S; Seth A; Iyer VK; Das P
Acta Radiol; 2012 Apr; 53(3):349-58. PubMed ID: 22496427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Role of magnetic resonance imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient at 3T in distinguishing between adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix and endometrium.
Lin YC; Lin G; Chen YR; Yen TC; Wang CC; Ng KK
Chang Gung Med J; 2011; 34(1):93-100. PubMed ID: 21392479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
