These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23991908)

  • 1. Does a consistently reliable solution exist for the successful placement of Class II composite resin restorations?
    Goodchild JH
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2013 Jun; 34 Spec No 4():8-13. PubMed ID: 23991908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Resin composite contours.
    Sidelsky H
    Br Dent J; 2010 May; 208(9):395-401. PubMed ID: 20448605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Adhesion, layering, and finishing of resin composite restorations for class II cavity preparations.
    Ferraris F
    Eur J Esthet Dent; 2007; 2(2):210-21. PubMed ID: 19655566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Optimize finishing and polishing of posterior composites.
    Blank JT
    Dent Today; 2014 Mar; 33(3):118, 120-1. PubMed ID: 24791326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Influence of matrix systems on proximal contact tightness of 2- and 3-surface posterior composite restorations in vivo.
    Wirsching E; Loomans BA; Klaiber B; Dörfer CE
    J Dent; 2011 May; 39(5):386-90. PubMed ID: 21414384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Class II composite placement is difficult! Solutions to help overcome the clinical challenges.
    Goodchild JH
    Dent Today; 2013 Nov; 32(11):110, 112, 114, 116-7. PubMed ID: 24358548
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Direct composite resin restorations for today's practice.
    Nash RW
    Dent Today; 2013 Jul; 32(7):114, 116, 118. PubMed ID: 23926718
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contemporary restoration of Class II caries. Direct posterior composites.
    Abel MG
    Dent Today; 2002 Nov; 21(11):94-7. PubMed ID: 12483933
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Direct posterior composite restorations: simplified success through a systematic approach.
    Koczarski MJ; Corredor AC
    Pract Proced Aesthet Dent; 2002; 14(1):87-94; quiz 96. PubMed ID: 11905163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Restoring class II cavities with composite resin, utilising the bulk filling technique.
    Lally U
    J Ir Dent Assoc; 2014; 60(2):74-6. PubMed ID: 24812757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Expediting Class II posterior composite placement.
    Trushkowsky R
    Dent Today; 2001 Oct; 20(10):96-8, 100-1. PubMed ID: 11665424
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Evolution of Comprehensive Care, Part 4. Direct Restorations.
    Kurtzman GM
    Dent Today; 2015 Aug; 34(8):22, 24, 26-7. PubMed ID: 26390760
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Using packable composites for direct posterior placement.
    Nash RW; Lowe RA; Leinfelder K
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2001 Aug; 132(8):1099-104. PubMed ID: 11575016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Alternative technique for class V resin composite restorations with minimum finishing/polishing procedures.
    Perez CR
    Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 20533640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. An alternative method to reduce polymerization shrinkage in direct posterior composite restorations.
    Deliperi S; Bardwell DN
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2002 Oct; 133(10):1387-98. PubMed ID: 12403542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Duplicating the form and function of posterior teeth with Class II resin-based composite.
    Christensen JJ
    Gen Dent; 2012; 60(2):104-8; quiz 109-10. PubMed ID: 22414503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Class II direct composite resin restorations with beta-quartz glass-ceramic inserts.
    Rada RE
    Quintessence Int; 1993 Nov; 24(11):793-8. PubMed ID: 20830892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Double-blind randomized clinical trial of posterior composite restorations with or without bevel: 6-month follow-up.
    Coelho-de-Souza FH; Klein-Júnior CA; Camargo JC; Beskow T; Balestrin MD; Demarco FF
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2010 Mar; 11(2):001-8. PubMed ID: 20228981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Functional and aesthetic guidelines for stress-reduced direct posterior composite restorations.
    Deliperi S
    Oper Dent; 2012; 37(4):425-31. PubMed ID: 22816500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical evaluation of proximal contacts of Class II esthetic direct restorations.
    Prakki A; Cilli R; Saad JO; Rodrigues JR
    Quintessence Int; 2004; 35(10):785-9. PubMed ID: 15553286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.