324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23993039)
1. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability assessment of calcaneal fracture classification systems.
Howells NR; Hughes AW; Jackson M; Atkins RM; Livingstone JA
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2014; 53(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 23993039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability of two classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Lauder AJ; Inda DJ; Bott AM; Clare MP; Fitzgibbons TC; Mormino MA
Foot Ankle Int; 2006 Apr; 27(4):251-5. PubMed ID: 16624214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Three-dimensional computed tomography is not indicated for the classification and characterization of calcaneal fractures.
Veltman ES; van den Bekerom MP; Doornberg JN; Verbeek DO; Rammelt S; Steller EP; Schepers T
Injury; 2014 Jul; 45(7):1117-20. PubMed ID: 24530220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility of three radiological classification systems for intra-articular calcaneal fractures.
Sayed-Noor AS; Agren PH; Wretenberg P
Foot Ankle Int; 2011 Sep; 32(9):861-6. PubMed ID: 22097161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT-Based Classification Systems for Intra-Articular Calcaneal Fractures: The Inter- and Intraobserver Variations as well as Integrality.
Wang Z; Liang S; Wang Y; Gao Z; Tian S; Zhao K; Chen W; Hou Z; Zhang Y
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2022; 61(4):850-854. PubMed ID: 34980533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Calcaneal fracture classification: a comparative study.
Schepers T; van Lieshout EM; Ginai AZ; Mulder PG; Heetveld MJ; Patka P
J Foot Ankle Surg; 2009; 48(2):156-62. PubMed ID: 19232967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Classification of intraarticular calcaneal fractures: comparison of two classification systems.
Falis M; Bargiel A; Pyszel K; Simon P
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2024 Apr; 34(3):1503-1508. PubMed ID: 38267792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Effect of three-dimensional computed tomography reconstructions on reliability.
Brunner A; Heeren N; Albrecht F; Hahn M; Ulmar B; Babst R
Foot Ankle Int; 2012 Sep; 33(9):727-33. PubMed ID: 22995259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Operative treatment of displaced intraarticular calcaneal fractures: long-term (10-20 Years) results in 108 fractures using a prognostic CT classification.
Sanders R; Vaupel ZM; Erdogan M; Downes K
J Orthop Trauma; 2014 Oct; 28(10):551-63. PubMed ID: 25243849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of reliability between the Lenke and King classification systems for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using radiographs that were not premeasured.
Richards BS; Sucato DJ; Konigsberg DE; Ouellet JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Jun; 28(11):1148-56; discussion 1156-7. PubMed ID: 12782983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of two- and three-dimensional computed tomography use on intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities of pilon fracture classification and treatment recommendation.
Byun SE; Choi W; Choi Y; Ahn TK; Kim HK; Yoon S; Lee J; Choi DS
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2019 Nov; 105(7):1407-1412. PubMed ID: 31542310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Computed tomography-based Three-Column Classification in tibial plateau fractures: introduction of its utility and assessment of its reproducibility.
Zhu Y; Yang G; Luo CF; Smith WR; Hu CF; Gao H; Zhong B; Zeng BF
J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2012 Sep; 73(3):731-7. PubMed ID: 22929503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability assessment of tibial plateau fracture classification systems.
Taşkesen A; Demirkale İ; Okkaoğlu MC; Özdemir M; Bilgili MG; Altay M
Eklem Hastalik Cerrahisi; 2017 Dec; 28(3):177-81. PubMed ID: 29125816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. ASSESSMENT OF REPRODUCIBILITY OF SANDERS CLASSIFICATION FOR CALCANEAL FRACTURES.
Piovesana LG; Lopes HC; Pacca DM; Ninomiya AF; Dinato MC; Pagnano RG
Acta Ortop Bras; 2016; 24(2):90-3. PubMed ID: 26981043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Inter- and intraobserver reliability assessment of the 2018 AO/OTA classification for high-energy pelvic ring injuries: A retrospective study.
Ansorge A; de Foy M; Poncet A; Gamulin A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2021 Oct; 107(6):102999. PubMed ID: 34216840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Two and three-dimensional computed tomography for the classification and management of distal humeral fractures. Evaluation of reliability and diagnostic accuracy.
Doornberg J; Lindenhovius A; Kloen P; van Dijk CN; Zurakowski D; Ring D
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2006 Aug; 88(8):1795-801. PubMed ID: 16882904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
Marongiu G; Leinardi L; Congia S; Frigau L; Mola F; Capone A
J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Interobserver and intraobserver reliability in the load sharing classification of the assessment of thoracolumbar burst fractures.
Dai LY; Jin WJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2005 Feb; 30(3):354-8. PubMed ID: 15682019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.
Berkes MB; Dines JS; Little MT; Garner MR; Shifflett GD; Lazaro LE; Wellman DS; Dines DM; Lorich DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Assessment of the AO/ASIF fracture classification for the distal tibia.
Martin JS; Marsh JL; Bonar SK; DeCoster TA; Found EM; Brandser EA
J Orthop Trauma; 1997 Oct; 11(7):477-83. PubMed ID: 9334948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
