These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23993312)

  • 1. Interrater reliability of grading strength of evidence varies with the complexity of the evidence in systematic reviews.
    Berkman ND; Lohr KN; Morgan LC; Kuo TM; Morton SC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Oct; 66(10):1105-1117.e1. PubMed ID: 23993312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
    Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Grading the strength of a body of evidence when assessing health care interventions: an EPC update.
    Berkman ND; Lohr KN; Ansari MT; Balk EM; Kane R; McDonagh M; Morton SC; Viswanathan M; Bass EB; Butler M; Gartlehner G; Hartling L; McPheeters M; Morgan LC; Reston J; Sista P; Whitlock E; Chang S
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Nov; 68(11):1312-24. PubMed ID: 25721570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new risk of bias checklist applicable to randomized trials, observational studies, and systematic reviews was developed and validated to be used for systematic reviews focusing on drug adverse events.
    Faillie JL; Ferrer P; Gouverneur A; Driot D; Berkemeyer S; Vidal X; Martínez-Zapata MJ; Huerta C; Castells X; Rottenkolber M; Schmiedl S; Sabaté M; Ballarín E; Ibáñez L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():168-175. PubMed ID: 28487158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AHRQ series paper 5: grading the strength of a body of evidence when comparing medical interventions--agency for healthcare research and quality and the effective health-care program.
    Owens DK; Lohr KN; Atkins D; Treadwell JR; Reston JT; Bass EB; Chang S; Helfand M
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 May; 63(5):513-23. PubMed ID: 19595577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing the risk of bias tool showed low reliability between individual reviewers and across consensus assessments of reviewer pairs.
    Hartling L; Hamm MP; Milne A; Vandermeer B; Santaguida PL; Ansari M; Tsertsvadze A; Hempel S; Shekelle P; Dryden DM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Sep; 66(9):973-81. PubMed ID: 22981249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rating the strength of scientific evidence: relevance for quality improvement programs.
    Lohr KN
    Int J Qual Health Care; 2004 Feb; 16(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 15020556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Observational evidence and strength of evidence domains: case examples.
    O'Neil M; Berkman N; Hartling L; Chang S; Anderson J; Motu'apuaka M; Guise JM; McDonagh MS
    Syst Rev; 2014 Apr; 3():35. PubMed ID: 24758494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. From the trenches: a cross-sectional study applying the GRADE tool in systematic reviews of healthcare interventions.
    Hartling L; Fernandes RM; Seida J; Vandermeer B; Dryden DM
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(4):e34697. PubMed ID: 22496843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Volume and health outcomes: evidence from systematic reviews and from evaluation of Italian hospital data].
    Amato L; Colais P; Davoli M; Ferroni E; Fusco D; Minozzi S; Moirano F; Sciattella P; Vecchi S; Ventura M; Perucci CA
    Epidemiol Prev; 2013; 37(2-3 Suppl 2):1-100. PubMed ID: 23851286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The use of fibrin sealant during non-emergency surgery: a systematic review of evidence of benefits and harms.
    Edwards SJ; Crawford F; van Velthoven MH; Berardi A; Osei-Assibey G; Bacelar M; Salih F; Wakefield V
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Dec; 20(94):1-224. PubMed ID: 28051764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The value of including observational studies in systematic reviews was unclear: a descriptive study.
    Seida J; Dryden DM; Hartling L
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1343-52. PubMed ID: 25248829
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The methodological quality assessment tools for preclinical and clinical studies, systematic review and meta-analysis, and clinical practice guideline: a systematic review.
    Zeng X; Zhang Y; Kwong JS; Zhang C; Li S; Sun F; Niu Y; Du L
    J Evid Based Med; 2015 Feb; 8(1):2-10. PubMed ID: 25594108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of limb muscle strength in critically ill patients: a systematic review.
    Vanpee G; Hermans G; Segers J; Gosselink R
    Crit Care Med; 2014 Mar; 42(3):701-11. PubMed ID: 24201180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. GRADE guidelines system is reproducible when instructions are clearly operationalized even among the guidelines panel members with limited experience with GRADE.
    Kumar A; Miladinovic B; Guyatt GH; Schünemann HJ; Djulbegovic B
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2016 Jul; 75():115-8. PubMed ID: 26845745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Conducting systematic reviews of economic evaluations.
    Gomersall JS; Jadotte YT; Xue Y; Lockwood S; Riddle D; Preda A
    Int J Evid Based Healthc; 2015 Sep; 13(3):170-8. PubMed ID: 26288063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.