267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23993435)
1. Uncemented porous tantalum acetabular components: early follow-up and failures in 613 primary total hip arthroplasties.
Noiseux NO; Long WJ; Mabry TM; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Mar; 29(3):617-20. PubMed ID: 23993435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Uncemented Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components: Early Follow-Up and Failures in 599 Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties.
Long WJ; Noiseux NO; Mabry TM; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
Iowa Orthop J; 2015; 35():108-13. PubMed ID: 26361451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of a porous tantalum uncemented acetabular cup in revision total hip arthroplasty: clinical and radiological results of 60 hips.
Unger AS; Lewis RJ; Gruen T
J Arthroplasty; 2005 Dec; 20(8):1002-9. PubMed ID: 16376255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Survivorship of a Porous Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular Component in Primary Hip Arthroplasty With a Mean Follow-Up of 18 Years.
Macheras GA; Lepetsos P; Leonidou AO; Anastasopoulos PP; Galanakos SP; Poultsides LA
J Arthroplasty; 2017 Dec; 32(12):3680-3684. PubMed ID: 28734611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Oblong acetabular cup, type TC, for revision total hip arthroplasty].
Trč T; Stastný E
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2012; 79(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 23286682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uncemented total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis in young patients: a mid-to long-term follow-up study from the Finnish Arthroplasty Register.
Eskelinen A; Remes V; Helenius I; Pulkkinen P; Nevalainen J; Paavolainen P
Acta Orthop; 2006 Feb; 77(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 16534703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Modern dual-mobility cup implanted with an uncemented stem: about 100 cases with 12-year follow-up.
Philippot R; Meucci JF; Boyer B; Farizon F
Surg Technol Int; 2013 Sep; 23():208-12. PubMed ID: 23686801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Trabecular Metal Versus Non-Trabecular Metal Acetabular Components and the Risk of Re-Revision Following Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Study from the National Joint Registry for England and Wales.
Matharu GS; Judge A; Murray DW; Pandit HG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jul; 100(13):1132-1140. PubMed ID: 29975265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcome of porous tantalum acetabular components for Paprosky type 3 and 4 acetabular defects.
Batuyong ED; Brock HS; Thiruvengadam N; Maloney WJ; Goodman SB; Huddleston JI
J Arthroplasty; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1318-22. PubMed ID: 24405625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Does the Risk of Rerevision Vary Between Porous Tantalum Cups and Other Cementless Designs After Revision Hip Arthroplasty?
Laaksonen I; Lorimer M; Gromov K; Rolfson O; Mäkelä KT; Graves SE; Malchau H; Mohaddes M
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2017 Dec; 475(12):3015-3022. PubMed ID: 28646360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Revision of failed total hip arthroplasty acetabular cups to porous tantalum components: a 5-year follow-up study.
Fernández-Fairen M; Murcia A; Blanco A; Meroño A; Murcia A; Ballester J
J Arthroplasty; 2010 Sep; 25(6):865-72. PubMed ID: 19748208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Minimum Five-Year Outcomes with Porous Tantalum Acetabular Cup and Augment Construct in Complex Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Jenkins DR; Odland AN; Sierra RJ; Hanssen AD; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2017 May; 99(10):e49. PubMed ID: 28509833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Excellent results of primary THA using a highly porous titanium cup.
Naziri Q; Issa K; Pivec R; Harwin SF; Delanois RE; Mont MA
Orthopedics; 2013 Apr; 36(4):e390-4. PubMed ID: 23590774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative survival of uncemented acetabular components following primary total hip arthroplasty.
Howard JL; Kremers HM; Loechler YA; Schleck CD; Harmsen WS; Berry DJ; Cabanela ME; Hanssen AD; Pagnano MW; Trousdale RT; Lewallen DG
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2011 Sep; 93(17):1597-604. PubMed ID: 21915574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Use of Porous Tantalum Augments for the Reconstruction of Acetabular Defect in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.
Ling TX; Li JL; Zhou K; Xiao Q; Pei FX; Zhou ZK
J Arthroplasty; 2018 Feb; 33(2):453-459. PubMed ID: 29033154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty. Evaluation of different fixation principles.
Thanner J
Acta Orthop Scand Suppl; 1999 Aug; 286():1-41. PubMed ID: 10572504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are porous tantalum cups superior to conventional reinforcement rings?
Brüggemann A; Fredlund E; Mallmin H; Hailer NP
Acta Orthop; 2017 Feb; 88(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 27892748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Radiostereometric analysis study of tantalum compared with titanium acetabular cups and highly cross-linked compared with conventional liners in young patients undergoing total hip replacement.
Ayers DC; Greene M; Snyder B; Aubin M; Drew J; Bragdon C
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2015 Apr; 97(8):627-34. PubMed ID: 25878306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Allofit cementless acetabular component: five-year experience].
Hoza P; Pilný J; Kubeš J
Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2013; 80(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 23562260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Porous Tantalum Monoblock Acetabular Component in Primary Hip Arthroplasty: A Minimum of 15-Year Follow-Up.
De Martino I; De Santis V; Sculco PK; D'Apolito R; Poultsides LA; Gasparini G
J Arthroplasty; 2016 Sep; 31(9 Suppl):110-4. PubMed ID: 26781387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
