BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23993695)

  • 21. Reduced variability of visual left ventricular ejection fraction assessment with reference images: The Japanese Association of Young Echocardiography Fellows multicenter study.
    Kusunose K; Shibayama K; Iwano H; Izumo M; Kagiyama N; Kurosawa K; Mihara H; Oe H; Onishi T; Onishi T; Ota M; Sasaki S; Shiina Y; Tsuruta H; Tanaka H;
    J Cardiol; 2018 Jul; 72(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 29472129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Clinical utility of automated assessment of left ventricular ejection fraction using artificial intelligence-assisted border detection.
    Rahmouni HW; Ky B; Plappert T; Duffy K; Wiegers SE; Ferrari VA; Keane MG; Kirkpatrick JN; Silvestry FE; St John Sutton M
    Am Heart J; 2008 Mar; 155(3):562-70. PubMed ID: 18294497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Quantification of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction using freehand transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Mannaerts HF; Van Der Heide JA; Kamp O; Papavassiliu T; Marcus JT; Beek A; Van Rossum AC; Twisk J; Visser CA
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Feb; 16(2):101-9. PubMed ID: 12574735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. A visual approach for the accurate determination of echocardiographic left ventricular ejection fraction by medical students.
    Hope MD; de la Pena E; Yang PC; Liang DH; McConnell MV; Rosenthal DN
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2003 Aug; 16(8):824-31. PubMed ID: 12878991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Assessment of ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in comparison with 99mTc gated SPECT].
    Pasowicz M; Klimeczek P; Wicher-Muniak E; Kolasa-Trela R; Kostkiewicz M; Szot W; Podolec P; Banyƛ R; Tracz W
    Przegl Lek; 2004; 61(6):674-7. PubMed ID: 15724663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Quantification of left ventricular size and function using contrast-enhanced real-time 3D imaging with power modulation: comparison with cardiac MRI.
    Coon PD; Pollard H; Furlong K; Lang RM; Mor-Avi V
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):1853-8. PubMed ID: 22906750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Validation of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction measurements by high-definition blood flow imaging: Comparisons with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and contrast echocardiography.
    Ahmad M; Wu G; Frank L; Dimaano MM
    Echocardiography; 2020 Dec; 37(12):1975-1980. PubMed ID: 33091164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Intra-observer and interobserver reproducibility of right ventricle volumes, function and mass by cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Catalano O; Antonaci S; Opasich C; Moro G; Mussida M; Perotti M; Calsamiglia G; Frascaroli M; Baldi M; Cobelli F
    J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2007 Oct; 8(10):807-14. PubMed ID: 17885519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Potential clinical impact of cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of ejection fraction on eligibility for cardioverter defibrillator implantation.
    Joshi SB; Connelly KA; Jimenez-Juan L; Hansen M; Kirpalani A; Dorian P; Mangat I; Al-Hesayen A; Crean AM; Wright GA; Yan AT; Leong-Poi H
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Oct; 14(1):69. PubMed ID: 23043729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. High-resolution cine MRI with TGRAPPA for fast assessment of left ventricular function at 3 Tesla.
    Theisen D; Sandner TA; Bamberg F; Bauner KU; Schwab F; Schwarz F; Arnoldi E; Reiser MF; Wintersperger BJ
    Eur J Radiol; 2013 May; 82(5):e219-24. PubMed ID: 23352697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparing left ventricular ejection fraction measurement using cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging.
    Luk WH; Au-Yeung AW; Lo AX; Loke TK; Ng TW
    Radiol Technol; 2014; 85(5):494-9. PubMed ID: 24806052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Defining the real-world reproducibility of visual grading of left ventricular function and visual estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction: impact of image quality, experience and accreditation.
    Cole GD; Dhutia NM; Shun-Shin MJ; Willson K; Harrison J; Raphael CE; Zolgharni M; Mayet J; Francis DP
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Oct; 31(7):1303-14. PubMed ID: 26141526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Analysis of left ventricular volumes and function: a multicenter comparison of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, cine ventriculography, and unenhanced and contrast-enhanced two-dimensional and three-dimensional echocardiography.
    Hoffmann R; Barletta G; von Bardeleben S; Vanoverschelde JL; Kasprzak J; Greis C; Becher H
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Mar; 27(3):292-301. PubMed ID: 24440110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Validation of a novel modified wall motion score for estimation of left ventricular ejection fraction in ischemic and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.
    Scholl D; Kim HW; Shah D; Fine NM; Tandon S; Thompson T; Drangova M; White JA
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):e923-8. PubMed ID: 22748555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Reconstructed versus real-time 3-dimensional echocardiography: comparison with magnetic resonance imaging.
    Jenkins C; Leano R; Chan J; Marwick TH
    J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2007 Jul; 20(7):862-8. PubMed ID: 17617313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Interobserver variability in assessing segmental function can be reduced by combining visual analysis of CMR cine sequences with corresponding parametric images of myocardial contraction.
    Redheuil AB; Kachenoura N; Laporte R; Azarine A; Lyon X; Jolivet O; Frouin F; Mousseaux E
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2007; 9(6):863-72. PubMed ID: 18066745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Intraoperative three-dimensional versus two-dimensional echocardiography for left ventricular assessment.
    Meris A; Santambrogio L; Casso G; Mauri R; Engeler A; Cassina T
    Anesth Analg; 2014 Apr; 118(4):711-20. PubMed ID: 24651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Assessment of global and regional left ventricular function using 64-slice multislice computed tomography and 2D echocardiography: a comparison with cardiac magnetic resonance.
    Annuar BR; Liew CK; Chin SP; Ong TK; Seyfarth MT; Chan WL; Fong YY; Ang CK; Lin N; Liew HB; Sim KH
    Eur J Radiol; 2008 Jan; 65(1):112-9. PubMed ID: 17466480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Fast data acquisition and analysis with real time triplane echocardiography for the assessment of left ventricular size and function: a validation study.
    Nucifora G; Badano LP; Dall'Armellina E; Gianfagna P; Allocca G; Fioretti PM
    Echocardiography; 2009 Jan; 26(1):66-75. PubMed ID: 19054037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Fully Automated Versus Standard Tracking of Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction and Longitudinal Strain: The FAST-EFs Multicenter Study.
    Knackstedt C; Bekkers SC; Schummers G; Schreckenberg M; Muraru D; Badano LP; Franke A; Bavishi C; Omar AM; Sengupta PP
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2015 Sep; 66(13):1456-66. PubMed ID: 26403342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.