These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Pavlovian conditioning under partial reinforcement: The effects of nonreinforced trials versus cumulative conditioned stimulus duration. Harris JA; Bouton ME J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):256-272. PubMed ID: 32162948 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Trial and intertrial durations in Pavlovian conditioning: issues of learning and performance. Lattal KM J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 1999 Oct; 25(4):433-50. PubMed ID: 17763570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Spatial serial conditioning maintained with minimal temporal contingency. Mazur GJ; Sanabria F Behav Processes; 2011 May; 87(1):135-41. PubMed ID: 21238551 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Magazine approach during a signal for food depends on Pavlovian, not instrumental, conditioning. Harris JA; Andrew BJ; Kwok DW J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Apr; 39(2):107-16. PubMed ID: 23421397 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The misbehavior of value and the discipline of the will. Dayan P; Niv Y; Seymour B; Daw ND Neural Netw; 2006 Oct; 19(8):1153-60. PubMed ID: 16938432 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Summation of reinforcement rates when conditioned stimuli are presented in compound. Andrew BJ; Harris JA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Oct; 37(4):385-93. PubMed ID: 21787099 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Within-subject effects of number of trials in rat conditioning procedures. Gottlieb DA; Rescorla RA J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):217-31. PubMed ID: 20384402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Feeding behavior of Aplysia: a model system for comparing cellular mechanisms of classical and operant conditioning. Baxter DA; Byrne JH Learn Mem; 2006; 13(6):669-80. PubMed ID: 17142299 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The operant and the classical in conditioned orientation of Drosophila melanogaster at the flight simulator. Brembs B; Heisenberg M Learn Mem; 2000; 7(2):104-15. PubMed ID: 10753977 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of neuronal reactions during classical and instrumental conditioning under similar conditions. Tsitolovsky L; Babkina N; Shvedov A Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2004 Jan; 81(1):82-95. PubMed ID: 14670362 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A test of Rescorla and Wagner's (1972) prediction of nonlinear effects in contingency learning. MorĂs J; Carnero S; Loy I Learn Behav; 2012 Dec; 40(4):507-19. PubMed ID: 22451374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Extending in vitro conditioning in Aplysia to analyze operant and classical processes in the same preparation. Brembs B; Baxter DA; Byrne JH Learn Mem; 2004; 11(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 15254218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The S-R issue: its status in behavior analysis and in Donahoe and Palmer's learning and complex behavior. Donahoe JW; Palmer DC; Burgos JE J Exp Anal Behav; 1997 Mar; 67(2):193-211. PubMed ID: 9132463 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Forward conditioning with wheel running causes place aversion in rats. Masaki T; Nakajima S Behav Processes; 2008 Sep; 79(1):43-7. PubMed ID: 18538954 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Importance of trials versus accumulating time across trials in partially reinforced appetitive conditioning. Bouton ME; Sunsay C J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2003 Jan; 29(1):62-77. PubMed ID: 12561134 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]