154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23994715)
1. Laparoscopy vs robotics in surgical management of endometrial cancer: comparison of intraoperative and postoperative complications.
Seror J; Bats AS; Huchon C; Bensaïd C; Douay-Hauser N; Lécuru F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2014; 21(1):120-5. PubMed ID: 23994715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Postoperative pain medication requirements in patients undergoing computer-assisted (“Robotic”) and standard laparoscopic procedures for newly diagnosed endometrial cancer.
Leitao MM; Malhotra V; Briscoe G; Suidan R; Dholakiya P; Santos K; Jewell EL; Brown CL; Sonoda Y; Abu-Rustum NR; Barakat RR; Gardner GJ
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Oct; 20(11):3561-7. PubMed ID: 23797751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
Payne TN; Dauterive FR
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A cost analysis of postoperative management in endometrial cancer patients treated by robotics versus laparoscopic approach.
Martino MA; Shubella J; Thomas MB; Morcrette RM; Schindler J; Williams S; Boulay R
Gynecol Oncol; 2011 Dec; 123(3):528-31. PubMed ID: 21968341
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Laparoscopy and body mass index: feasibility and outcome in obese patients treated for gynecologic diseases.
Camanni M; Bonino L; Delpiano EM; Migliaretti G; Berchialla P; Deltetto F
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(5):576-82. PubMed ID: 20619751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical outcome and complications of laparoscopic surgery compared with traditional surgery in women with endometrial cancer.
Kuoppala T; Tomás E; Heinonen PK
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2004 Jul; 270(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 12728326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Minimally invasive staging of endometrial cancer is feasible and safe in elderly women.
Frey MK; Ihnow SB; Worley MJ; Heyman KP; Kessler R; Slomovitz BM; Holcomb KM
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2011; 18(2):200-4. PubMed ID: 21354065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Endometrial cancer surgery costs: robot vs laparoscopy.
Holtz DO; Miroshnichenko G; Finnegan MO; Chernick M; Dunton CJ
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(4):500-3. PubMed ID: 20547112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Clinical outcomes in endometrial cancer care when the standard of care shifts from open surgery to robotics.
Mok ZW; Yong EL; Low JJ; Ng JS
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2012 Jun; 22(5):819-25. PubMed ID: 22561178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-benefit analysis of laparoscopic surgery versus laparotomy for patients with endometrioid endometrial cancer: experience from an institute in China.
Lu Z; Yi X; Feng W; Ding J; Xu H; Zhou X; Hua K
J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2012 Jul; 38(7):1011-7. PubMed ID: 22487546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcomes and costs associated with robotic colectomy in the minimally invasive era.
Tyler JA; Fox JP; Desai MM; Perry WB; Glasgow SC
Dis Colon Rectum; 2013 Apr; 56(4):458-66. PubMed ID: 23478613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy is an improvement over laparotomy in women with a limited number of myomas.
Ascher-Walsh CJ; Capes TL
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(3):306-10. PubMed ID: 20303834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature.
Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F
Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Hysterectomy for obese women with endometrial cancer: laparoscopy or laparotomy?
Eltabbakh GH; Shamonki MI; Moody JM; Garafano LL
Gynecol Oncol; 2000 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):329-35. PubMed ID: 10985889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ovarian remnant syndrome: comparison of laparotomy, laparoscopy and robotic surgery.
Zapardiel I; Zanagnolo V; Kho RM; Magrina JF; Magtibay PM
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2012 Aug; 91(8):965-9. PubMed ID: 22583107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic management of endometrial cancer in nonobese and obese women: A consecutive series.
Ghezzi F; Cromi A; Bergamini V; Uccella S; Beretta P; Franchi M; Bolis P
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2006; 13(4):269-75. PubMed ID: 16825065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dual-console robotic surgery compared to laparoscopic surgery with respect to surgical outcomes in a gynecologic oncology fellowship program.
Smith AL; Krivak TC; Scott EM; Rauh-Hain JA; Sukumvanich P; Olawaiye AB; Richard SD
Gynecol Oncol; 2012 Sep; 126(3):432-6. PubMed ID: 22613352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery.
Hoekstra AV; Jairam-Thodla A; Rademaker A; Singh DK; Buttin BM; Lurain JR; Schink JC; Lowe MP
Int J Med Robot; 2009 Dec; 5(4):392-7. PubMed ID: 19455550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic-assisted laparoscopy, laparoscopy and laparotomy for endometrial cancer.
Coronado PJ; Herraiz MA; Magrina JF; Fasero M; Vidart JA
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2012 Dec; 165(2):289-94. PubMed ID: 22819573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial cancer: Robotics or laparoscopy?
Seamon LG; Cohn DE; Henretta MS; Kim KH; Carlson MJ; Phillips GS; Fowler JM
Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Apr; 113(1):36-41. PubMed ID: 19168206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
