These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23994941)
1. Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphomas from high-grade gliomas by rCBV and percentage of signal intensity recovery derived from dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Xing Z; You RX; Li J; Liu Y; Cao DR Clin Neuroradiol; 2014 Dec; 24(4):329-36. PubMed ID: 23994941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Differentiation of Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma and High-Grade Glioma with Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast-Derived Metrics: Pilot Study. Chaganti J; Taylor M; Woodford H; Steel T World Neurosurg; 2021 Jul; 151():e979-e987. PubMed ID: 34020062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in posterior fossa tumors: differences and similarities with supratentorial tumors. Gaudino S; Benenati M; Martucci M; Botto A; Infante A; Marrazzo A; Ramaglia A; Marziali G; Guadalupi P; Colosimo C Radiol Med; 2020 Apr; 125(4):416-422. PubMed ID: 31916104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. Law M; Yang S; Wang H; Babb JS; Johnson G; Cha S; Knopp EA; Zagzag D AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2003; 24(10):1989-98. PubMed ID: 14625221 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Primary central nervous system lymphoma and atypical glioblastoma: multiparametric differentiation by using diffusion-, perfusion-, and susceptibility-weighted MR imaging. Kickingereder P; Wiestler B; Sahm F; Heiland S; Roethke M; Schlemmer HP; Wick W; Bendszus M; Radbruch A Radiology; 2014 Sep; 272(3):843-50. PubMed ID: 24814181 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of diffusion and perfusion imaging. Arvinda HR; Kesavadas C; Sarma PS; Thomas B; Radhakrishnan VV; Gupta AK; Kapilamoorthy TR; Nair S J Neurooncol; 2009 Aug; 94(1):87-96. PubMed ID: 19229590 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas. Server A; Kulle B; Gadmar ØB; Josefsen R; Kumar T; Nakstad PH Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):462-70. PubMed ID: 20708868 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma and high-grade glioma with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Liao W; Liu Y; Wang X; Jiang X; Tang B; Fang J; Chen C; Hu Z Acta Radiol; 2009 Mar; 50(2):217-25. PubMed ID: 19096950 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Relative cerebral blood volume from dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in the grading of pediatric primary brain tumors. Ho CY; Cardinal JS; Kamer AP; Kralik SF Neuroradiology; 2015 Mar; 57(3):299-306. PubMed ID: 25504266 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The added value of apparent diffusion coefficient to cerebral blood volume in the preoperative grading of diffuse gliomas. Hilario A; Ramos A; Perez-Nuñez A; Salvador E; Millan JM; Lagares A; Sepulveda JM; Gonzalez-Leon P; Hernandez-Lain A; Ricoy JR AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2012 Apr; 33(4):701-7. PubMed ID: 22207304 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Differentiation of primary central nervous system lymphoma from high-grade glioma and brain metastasis using arterial spin labeling and dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Xi YB; Kang XW; Wang N; Liu TT; Zhu YQ; Cheng G; Wang K; Li C; Guo F; Yin H Eur J Radiol; 2019 Mar; 112():59-64. PubMed ID: 30777220 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Semiquantitative assessment of intratumoral susceptibility signals using non-contrast-enhanced high-field high-resolution susceptibility-weighted imaging in patients with gliomas: comparison with MR perfusion imaging. Park MJ; Kim HS; Jahng GH; Ryu CW; Park SM; Kim SY AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Aug; 30(7):1402-8. PubMed ID: 19369602 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Utility of Percentage Signal Recovery and Baseline Signal in DSC-MRI Optimized for Relative CBV Measurement for Differentiating Glioblastoma, Lymphoma, Metastasis, and Meningioma. Lee MD; Baird GL; Bell LC; Quarles CC; Boxerman JL AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2019 Sep; 40(9):1445-1450. PubMed ID: 31371360 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Differentiation between primary central nervous system lymphoma and glioblastoma: a comparative study of parameters derived from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion-weighted MRI. Nakajima S; Okada T; Yamamoto A; Kanagaki M; Fushimi Y; Okada T; Arakawa Y; Takagi Y; Miyamoto S; Togashi K Clin Radiol; 2015 Dec; 70(12):1393-9. PubMed ID: 26382744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Percentage signal intensity recovery: A step ahead of rCBV in DSC MR perfusion imaging for the differentiation of common neoplasms of brain. Surendra KL; Patwari S; Agrawal S; Chadaga H; Nagadi A Indian J Cancer; 2020; 57(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 31898591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Relative cerebral blood volume values to differentiate high-grade glioma recurrence from posttreatment radiation effect: direct correlation between image-guided tissue histopathology and localized dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging measurements. Hu LS; Baxter LC; Smith KA; Feuerstein BG; Karis JP; Eschbacher JM; Coons SW; Nakaji P; Yeh RF; Debbins J; Heiserman JE AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2009 Mar; 30(3):552-8. PubMed ID: 19056837 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Non-invasive assessment of intratumoral vascularity using arterial spin labeling: A comparison to susceptibility-weighted imaging for the differentiation of primary cerebral lymphoma and glioblastoma. Furtner J; Schöpf V; Preusser M; Asenbaum U; Woitek R; Wöhrer A; Hainfellner JA; Wolfsberger S; Prayer D Eur J Radiol; 2014 May; 83(5):806-10. PubMed ID: 24613549 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dynamic contrast-enhanced and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion MR imaging for glioma grading: Preliminary comparison of vessel compartment and permeability parameters using hotspot and histogram analysis. Santarosa C; Castellano A; Conte GM; Cadioli M; Iadanza A; Terreni MR; Franzin A; Bello L; Caulo M; Falini A; Anzalone N Eur J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 85(6):1147-56. PubMed ID: 27161065 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Preoperative Grading of Glioma Using Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast MRI: Relative Cerebral Blood Volume Analysis of Intra-tumoural and Peri-tumoural Tissue. Soliman RK; Gamal SA; Essa AA; Othman MH Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2018 Apr; 167():86-92. PubMed ID: 29471287 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing perfusion metrics obtained from a single compartment versus pharmacokinetic modeling methods using dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging with glioma grade. Law M; Young R; Babb J; Rad M; Sasaki T; Zagzag D; Johnson G AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2006 Oct; 27(9):1975-82. PubMed ID: 17032878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]