These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2399540)
1. Methodologic issues in stoke outcome research. Proceedings of a national symposium. Buffalo, New York, July 10-12, 1989. Stroke; 1990 Sep; 21(9 Suppl):II1-73. PubMed ID: 2399540 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Symposium recommendations for methodology in stroke outcome research. Task Force on Stroke Impairment, Task Force on Stroke Disability, and Task Force on Stroke Handicap. Stroke; 1990 Sep; 21(9 Suppl):II68-73. PubMed ID: 2144674 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Stroke outcome research, a multidimensional problem in need of multidimensional answers. The Loewenstein Rehabilitation Center Stroke and Stroke Outcome Research at a crossroad. Ring H Stroke; 1990 Sep; 21(9 Suppl):II61-3. PubMed ID: 2144672 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Current use of functional assessment to measure stroke outcome in Canada. Clifford J Stroke; 1990 Sep; 21(9 Suppl):II59-60. PubMed ID: 2399556 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward a uniform assessment of "outcome". Feigenson JS Stroke; 1982; 13(6):873-6. PubMed ID: 7147308 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps (ICIDH) as a conceptual basis for stroke outcome research. A tribute to Philip H.N. Wood. Granger CV; Gresham GE Stroke; 1990 Sep; 21(9 Suppl):II66-7. PubMed ID: 2144673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stroke rehabilitation: a community setting. Jones LE Med J Aust; 1979 Nov; 2(10):523-4. PubMed ID: 530146 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Predictive factors in stroke outcome and implications for intervention. Tupper A; Henley S Int J Rehabil Res; 1987; 10(4 Suppl 5):119-22. PubMed ID: 3503834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. [Stroke units; a different approach in rehabilitation? Observations on a different method of treatment]. Prevo AJ Tijdschr Gerontol Geriatr; 1982 Jun; 13(3):90-3. PubMed ID: 7112644 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The critical path method alone does nothing to improve performance. Luttman RJ QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1993 May; 19(5):142-3. PubMed ID: 8380015 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Comprehensive multidisciplinary assessment and management of osteoarthritis. Proceedings of a symposium. New York City, September 26, 1986. Clin Ther; 1986; 9 Suppl B():1-68. PubMed ID: 3829091 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Rehabilitation of the geriatric patient. Stroke rehabilitation, the rehabilitation team, and the usefulness of functional assessment. Gresham GE Prim Care; 1982 Mar; 9(1):239-47. PubMed ID: 6918031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Plant flavonoids in biology and medicine. Biochemical, pharmacological, and structure-activity relationships. Proceedings of a symposium. Buffalo, New York, July 22-26, 1985. Prog Clin Biol Res; 1986; 213():1-592. PubMed ID: 3714734 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Rehabilitation program evaluation using a revised level of rehabilitation scale (LORS-II). Carey RG; Posavac EJ Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 1982 Aug; 63(8):367-70. PubMed ID: 7115029 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]