231 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23996244)
1. Neointimal coverage and vasodilator response to titanium-nitride-oxide-coated bioactive stents and everolimus-eluting stents in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the BASE-ACS trial.
Karjalainen P; Kiviniemi TO; Lehtinen T; Nammas W; Ylitalo A; Saraste A; Mikkelsson J; Pietila M; Biancari F; Airaksinen JK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Dec; 29(8):1693-703. PubMed ID: 23996244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Early vascular healing after titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stent versus platinum-chromium everolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Varho V; Kiviniemi TO; Nammas W; Sia J; Romppanen H; Pietilä M; Airaksinen JK; Mikkelsson J; Tuomainen P; Perälä A; Karjalainen PP
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1031-9. PubMed ID: 27076220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optical coherence tomography follow-up 18 months after titanium-nitride-oxide-coated versus everolimus-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome.
Karjalainen P; Paana T; Ylitalo A; Sia J; Nammas W
Acta Radiol; 2017 Sep; 58(9):1077-1084. PubMed ID: 28273737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Stent strut coverage of titanium-nitride-oxide coated stent compared to paclitaxel-eluting stent in acute myocardial infarction: TITAX-OCT study.
Lehtinen T; Airaksinen KE; Ylitalo A; Karjalainen PP
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Dec; 28(8):1859-66. PubMed ID: 22362097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of vascular responses after different types of second-generation drug-eluting stents implantation detected by optical coherence tomography.
Ohtani H; Kimura S; Sugiyama T; Hishikari K; Misawa T; Mizusawa M; Hayasaka K; Yamakami Y; Kojima K; Sagawa Y; Hikita H; Ashikaga T; Takahashi A; Isobe M
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Feb; 33(2):177-186. PubMed ID: 27761750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The REMEDEE-OCT Study: An Evaluation of the Bioengineered COMBO Dual-Therapy CD34 Antibody-Covered Sirolimus-Eluting Coronary Stent Compared With a Cobalt-Chromium Everolimus-Eluting Stent in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes: Insights From Optical Coherence Tomography Imaging Analysis.
Jaguszewski M; Aloysius R; Wang W; Bezerra HG; Hill J; De Winter RJ; Karjalainen PP; Verheye S; Wijns W; Lüscher TF; Joner M; Costa M; Landmesser U
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2017 Mar; 10(5):489-499. PubMed ID: 28279316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of zotarolimus-eluting stent and everolimus-eluting stent for vascular healing response: serial 3-month and 12-month optical coherence tomography study.
Kim SJ; Lee H; Cho JM; Park CB; Kim W; Kato K; Yonetsu T; Kim CJ; Jang IK
Coron Artery Dis; 2013 Aug; 24(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 23722649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Stent coverage and neointimal proliferation in bare metal stents postdilated with a Paclitaxel-eluting balloon versus everolimus-eluting stents: prospective randomized study using optical coherence tomography at 6-month follow-up.
Poerner TC; Otto S; Gassdorf J; Nitsche K; Janiak F; Scheller B; Goebel B; Jung C; Figulla HR
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(6):760-7. PubMed ID: 25371536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Titanium-Nitride-Oxide-Coated Versus Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome: The Randomized TIDES-ACS Trial.
Tonino PAL; Pijls NHJ; Collet C; Nammas W; Van der Heyden J; Romppanen H; Kervinen K; Airaksinen JKE; Sia J; Lalmand J; Frambach P; Penaranda AS; De Bruyne B; Karjalainen PP;
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 13(14):1697-1705. PubMed ID: 32703593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Difference in neointimal coverage at chronic stage between bare metal stent and sirolimus-eluting stent evaluated at stent-strut level by optical coherence tomography.
Ikuta S; Kobuke K; Iwanaga Y; Nakauchi Y; Yamaji K; Miyazaki S
Heart Vessels; 2014 May; 29(3):320-7. PubMed ID: 23793881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative study of neointimal coverage between titanium-nitric oxide-coated and everolimus-eluting stents in acute coronary syndromes.
Sia J; Nammas W; Collet C; De Bruyne B; Karjalainen PP
Rev Esp Cardiol (Engl Ed); 2023 Mar; 76(3):150-156. PubMed ID: 35752571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with acute coronary syndrome - the Activity of Platelets after Inhibition and Cardiovascular Events: Optical Coherence Tomography (APICE OCT) study.
Chieffo A; Buchanan GL; Parodi G; Versaci F; Bianchi RM; Valenti R; Saccà S; Mongiardo A; Span S; Migliorini A; Spaccarotella C; Reimers B; Antoniucci D; Indolfi C; Ferrari A; Maehara A; Mintz GS; Colombo A
EuroIntervention; 2014 Dec; 10(8):916-23. PubMed ID: 24974806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Very early neointimal coverage of new biodegradable polymer drug-eluting stent compared with durable polymer everolimus-eluting stent evaluated by optical frequency domain imaging.
Kobayashi N; Ito Y; Yamawaki M; Araki M; Sakai T; Sakamoto Y; Mori S; Tsutsumi M; Nauchi M; Honda Y; Tokuda T; Makino K; Shirai S; Hirano K
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2018 Apr; 34(4):515-522. PubMed ID: 29159531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of neointimal coverage between durable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents and bioresorbable-polymer everolimus-eluting stents 1 year after implantation using high-resolution coronary angioscopy.
Nojima Y; Adachi H; Ihara M; Kurimoto T; Okayama K; Sakata Y; Nanto S
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2019 Aug; 94(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 30737973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Subgroup Analysis Comparing Ultrathin, Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stents Versus Thin, Durable Polymer Everolimus-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome Patients.
Roguin A; Kandzari DE; Marcusohn E; Koolen JJ; Doros G; Massaro JM; Garcia-Garcia HM; Bennett J; Gharib EG; Cutlip DE; Waksman R
Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(10):e007331. PubMed ID: 30354631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Serial assessment of vessel interactions after drug-eluting stent implantation in unprotected distal left main coronary artery disease using frequency-domain optical coherence tomography.
Fujino Y; Attizzani GF; Bezerra HG; Wang W; Tahara S; Yamamoto H; Chamie D; Kanaya T; Mehanna E; Takagi K; Nakamura S; Costa MA
JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2013 Oct; 6(10):1035-45. PubMed ID: 24156964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Favorable neointimal coverage in everolimus-eluting stent at 9 months after stent implantation: comparison with sirolimus-eluting stent using optical coherence tomography.
Choi HH; Kim JS; Yoon DH; Hong KS; Kim TH; Kim BK; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Hong MK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2012 Mar; 28(3):491-7. PubMed ID: 21442265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Early vascular healing with rapid breakdown biodegradable polymer sirolimus-eluting versus durable polymer everolimus-eluting stents assessed by optical coherence tomography.
Tada T; Byrne RA; Schuster T; Cuni R; Kitabata H; Tiroch K; Dirninger A; Gratze F; Kaspar K; Zenker G; Joner M; Schömig A; Kastrati A
Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2013; 14(2):84-9. PubMed ID: 23352095
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of neointimal hyperplasia and peri-stent vascular remodeling after implantation of everolimus-eluting versus sirolimus-eluting stents: intravascular ultrasound results from the EXCELLENT study.
Ko YG; Shin DH; Kim JS; Kim BK; Choi D; Hong MK; Gwon HC; Ahn T; Chae IH; Yoon JH; Kim HS; Jang Y;
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Aug; 29(6):1229-36. PubMed ID: 23456359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized comparison of acute stent malapposition between platinum-chromium versus cobalt-chromium everolimus-eluting stents.
Kim BK; Shin DH; Kim JS; Ko YG; Choi D; Jang Y; Hong MK
Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2015 Feb; 31(2):269-77. PubMed ID: 25345751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
