146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23997286)
1. Improvements in timeliness resulting from implementation of electronic laboratory reporting and an electronic disease surveillance system.
Samoff E; Fangman MT; Fleischauer AT; Waller AE; Macdonald PD
Public Health Rep; 2013; 128(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 23997286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential effects of electronic laboratory reporting on improving timeliness of infectious disease notification--Florida, 2002-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Dec; 57(49):1325-8. PubMed ID: 19078921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Completeness and timeliness of electronic vs. conventional laboratory reporting for communicable disease surveillance--Oklahoma, 2011.
Johnson MG; Williams J; Lee A; Bradley KK
Public Health Rep; 2014 May; 129(3):261-6. PubMed ID: 24791024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Impact of electronic laboratory reporting on hepatitis A surveillance in New York City.
Moore KM; Reddy V; Kapell D; Balter S
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2008; 14(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 18708886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Progress in increasing electronic reporting of laboratory results to public health agencies--United States, 2013.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2013 Sep; 62(38):797-999. PubMed ID: 24067585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Benefits and barriers to electronic laboratory results reporting for notifiable diseases: the New York City Department of Health and Mental Hygiene experience.
Nguyen TQ; Thorpe L; Makki HA; Mostashari F
Am J Public Health; 2007 Apr; 97 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S142-5. PubMed ID: 17413058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Electronic laboratory reporting for the infectious diseases physician and clinical microbiologist.
Wurtz R; Cameron BJ
Clin Infect Dis; 2005 Jun; 40(11):1638-43. PubMed ID: 15889362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Timeliness in the German surveillance system for infectious diseases: Amendment of the infection protection act in 2013 decreased local reporting time to 1 day.
Schumacher J; Diercke M; Salmon M; Czogiel I; Schumacher D; Claus H; Gilsdorf A
PLoS One; 2017; 12(10):e0187037. PubMed ID: 29088243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Update on progress in electronic reporting of laboratory results to public health agencies - United States, 2014.
Lamb E; Satre J; Hurd-Kundeti G; Liscek B; Hall CJ; Pinner RW; Conn L; Zajac J; Smallwood M; Smith K;
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2015 Apr; 64(12):328-30. PubMed ID: 25837244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Electronic laboratory-based reporting for public health.
Pinner RW; Jernigan DB; Sutliff SM
Mil Med; 2000 Jul; 165(7 Suppl 2):20-4. PubMed ID: 10920632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. We can have it all: improved surveillance outcomes and decreased personnel costs associated with electronic reportable disease surveillance, North Carolina, 2010.
Samoff E; Dibiase L; Fangman MT; Fleischauer AT; Waller AE; MacDonald PD
Am J Public Health; 2013 Dec; 103(12):2292-7. PubMed ID: 24134385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Reassessing provider reporting in the age of electronic surveillance.
Stachel AG; Waechter H; Bornschlegel K; Reddy V; Hanson H; Wen T; Baumgartner J; Balter S
J Public Health Manag Pract; 2014; 20(2):240-5. PubMed ID: 24458313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effect of electronic laboratory reporting on the burden of lyme disease surveillance--New Jersey, 2001-2006.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC)
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep; 2008 Jan; 57(2):42-5. PubMed ID: 18199968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Notifiable condition reporting practices: implications for public health agency participation in a health information exchange.
Revere D; Hills RH; Dixon BE; Gibson PJ; Grannis SJ
BMC Public Health; 2017 Mar; 17(1):247. PubMed ID: 28284190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automating Case Reporting of Chlamydia and Gonorrhea to Public Health Authorities in Illinois Clinics: Implementation and Evaluation of Findings.
Mishra N; Grant R; Patel MT; Guntupalli S; Hamilton A; Carr J; McKnight E; Wise W; deRoode D; Jellison J; Collins NV; Pérez A; Karki S
JMIR Public Health Surveill; 2023 Mar; 9():e38868. PubMed ID: 36917153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Completeness and timeliness of notifiable disease reporting: a comparison of laboratory and provider reports submitted to a large county health department.
Dixon BE; Zhang Z; Lai PTS; Kirbiyik U; Williams J; Hills R; Revere D; Gibson PJ; Grannis SJ
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2017 Jun; 17(1):87. PubMed ID: 28645285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Disease reporting from an automated laboratory-based reporting system to a state health department via local county health departments.
Backer HD; Bissell SR; Vugia DJ
Public Health Rep; 2001; 116(3):257-65. PubMed ID: 12034915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Changes to Timeliness and Completeness of Infectious Disease Reporting in Texas After Implementation of an Epidemiologic Capacity Program.
Stone KW; Felkner M; Garza E; Perez-Patron M; Schmit CD; McDonald TJ; Horney JA
Public Health Rep; 2022; 137(4):679-686. PubMed ID: 33930278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electronic health information quality challenges and interventions to improve public health surveillance data and practice.
Dixon BE; Siegel JA; Oemig TV; Grannis SJ
Public Health Rep; 2013; 128(6):546-53. PubMed ID: 24179266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Electronic reporting improves timeliness and completeness of infectious disease notification, The Netherlands, 2003.
Ward M; Brandsema P; van Straten E; Bosman A
Euro Surveill; 2005 Jan; 10(1):27-30. PubMed ID: 15701937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
