These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23997468)

  • 1. A comparative evaluation of static and functional methods for recording centric relation and condylar guidance: a clinical study.
    Thakur M; Jain V; Parkash H; Kumar P
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2012 Sep; 12(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 23997468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinico-radiographic study to compare and co-relate sagittal condylar guidance determined by intraoral gothic arch tracing method and panoramic radiograph in completely edentulous patients.
    Shetty S; Kunta M; Shenoy K
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 29430137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparative Analysis of Sagittal Condylar Guidance Recorded by Intraoral Gothic Arch Tracing and Panoramic Radiograph in Completely Edentulous Patients.
    Sirana P; Kumar N; Malhotra A; Singhal N; Chaudhary N
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov; 19(11):1301-1305. PubMed ID: 30602631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Evaluation of accuracy between extraoral Gothic arch tracing and various other methods assessing horizontal condylar guidance angle in completely edentulous patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Potdukhe SS; Iyer JM; Nadgere JB
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2023; 23(4):322-334. PubMed ID: 37861609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A clinical application study of digital manufacturing simple intraoral Gothic arch-tracing device in determining the centric relation of complete dentures].
    Zhou TF; Yang X; Wang RJ; Cheng MX; Zhang H; Wei JQ
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2023 Feb; 55(1):101-107. PubMed ID: 36718696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative Evaluation of the Horizontal Condylar Guidance Using Protrusive Interocclusal Records, OPG, and CBCT in Edentulous Patients: An
    Gheedle R; John P
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2023 Jun; 24(6):403-408. PubMed ID: 37534507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of accuracy of protrusive condylar guidance registration by two interocclusal recording materials in edentulous patients.
    Kumar CD; Selvaraj S; Mohan J; Raju R
    Ann Afr Med; 2023; 22(3):316-320. PubMed ID: 37417019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparative study to measure the condylar guidance by the radiographic and clinical methods.
    Shreshta P; Jain V; Bhalla A; Pruthi G
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2012 Aug; 4(3):153-7. PubMed ID: 22977723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A study on the accuracy of horizontal condylar guidance values in edentulous patients using preprosthetic diagnostic radiographs.
    Paul R; Das S; Bhattacharyya J; Ghosh S; Goel P; Dutta K
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2018; 18(3):263-270. PubMed ID: 30111916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative evaluation of condylar guidance obtained by three different interocclusal recording materials in a semi-adjustable articulator and digital panoramic radiographic images in dentate patients: An
    Keerthana SR; Mohammed HS; Hariprasad A; Anand M; Ayesha S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2021; 21(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 34810368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical reproducibility of different centric relation recording techniques in edentulous individuals: An observational cross-sectional study.
    de Sousa Ervolino IC; Goiato MC; de Moraes Melo Neto CL; de Caxias FP; da Silva EVF; Túrcio KHL; Dos Santos DM
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Jul; 32(6):497-504. PubMed ID: 36573906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Comparative Evaluation of Condylar Guidance Value from Radiograph with Interocclusal Records made During Jaw Relation and Try-in: A Pilot Study.
    Shetty S; Satish Babu CL; Tambake D; Surendra Kumar GP; Setpal AT
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Sep; 13(3):321-6. PubMed ID: 24431754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative analysis of sagittal condylar guidance by protrusive interocclusal records with panoramic and lateral cephalogram radiographs in dentulous population: A clinico-radiographic study.
    Galagali G; Kalekhan SM; Nidawani P; Naik J; Behera S
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2016; 16(2):148-53. PubMed ID: 27141164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Age changes in horizontal condylar angle: a clinical and cephalometric study.
    Sreelal T; Janardanan K; Nair AS; Nair AS
    J Indian Prosthodont Soc; 2013 Jun; 13(2):108-12. PubMed ID: 24431719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study.
    dos Santos J; Nelson S; Nowlin T
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Jan; 89(1):54-9. PubMed ID: 12589287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Condylar guidance: correlation between protrusive interocclusal record and panoramic radiographic image: a pilot study.
    Tannamala PK; Pulagam M; Pottem SR; Swapna B
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Apr; 21(3):181-4. PubMed ID: 22339685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative evaluation of sagittal condylar guidance obtained from a clinical method and with cone beam computed tomography in dentate individuals.
    Das A; Muddugangadhar BC; Mawani DP; Mukhopadhyay A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 May; 125(5):753-757. PubMed ID: 32423552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Evaluation of electromyogram activity and masticatory efficiency in edentulous individuals whose maxillomandibular horizontal relationship records were obtained with three different methods].
    Cuiling L; Liyuan Y; Zheng Z; Xu G
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2016 Oct; 34(5):493-497. PubMed ID: 28326708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of the replicability of routinely used centric relation registration techniques.
    Keshvad A; Winstanley RB
    J Prosthodont; 2003 Jun; 12(2):90-101. PubMed ID: 12964681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluation of condylar inclination of dentulous subjects determined by axiograph and to compare with manual programming of articulators using protrusive interocclusal record.
    Prasad KD; Shetty M; Chandy BK
    Contemp Clin Dent; 2015; 6(3):371-4. PubMed ID: 26321837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.