These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23998162)

  • 21. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 2: rapid-prototype medical modeling and stereolithographic drilling guides requiring bone exposure.
    Rosenfeld AL; Mandelaris GA; Tardieu PB
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Aug; 26(4):347-53. PubMed ID: 16939016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Implant placement accuracy when using stereolithographic template as a surgical guide: preliminary results.
    Al-Harbi SA; Sun AY
    Implant Dent; 2009 Feb; 18(1):46-56. PubMed ID: 19212237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
    Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Implant surgery using bone- and mucosa-supported stereolithographic guides in totally edentulous jaws: surgical and post-operative outcomes of computer-aided vs. standard techniques.
    Arisan V; Karabuda CZ; Ozdemir T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Sep; 21(9):980-8. PubMed ID: 20497439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Guided and computer-assisted implant surgery and prosthetic: The continuous digital workflow].
    Pascual D; Vaysse J
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac Chir Orale; 2016 Feb; 117(1):28-35. PubMed ID: 26781159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Precision of implant placement with stereolithographic templates: a pilot in vitro study.
    Bilhan H; Arat S; Mumcu E; Geckili O; Sakar O
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):569-74. PubMed ID: 21126171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
    Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Accuracy of implant placement with a stereolithographic surgical template.
    Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Giansanti M; Calasso S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(3):655-63. PubMed ID: 22616060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Deviations between placed and planned implant positions: an accuracy pilot study of skeletally supported stereolithographic surgical templates.
    Stübinger S; Buitrago-Tellez C; Cantelmi G
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2014 Aug; 16(4):540-51. PubMed ID: 23167722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of the accuracy of three different computer-aided surgery systems in dental implantology: optical tracking vs. stereolithographic splint systems.
    Ruppin J; Popovic A; Strauss M; Spüntrup E; Steiner A; Stoll C
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jul; 19(7):709-16. PubMed ID: 18492085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Clinical and radiological evaluation of a template-guided (NobelGuide™) treatment concept.
    Vasak C; Kohal RJ; Lettner S; Rohner D; Zechner W
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jan; 25(1):116-23. PubMed ID: 22984962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Immediate functional loading of implants placed with flapless surgery in the edentulous maxilla: 1-year follow-up of a single cohort study.
    Cannizzaro G; Leone M; Esposito M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(1):87-95. PubMed ID: 17340901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability.
    Rosenfeld AL; Mandelaris GA; Tardieu PB
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2006 Jun; 26(3):215-21. PubMed ID: 16836163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Navigated flapless transmucosal implant placement in the mandible: a pilot study in 20 patients.
    Wittwer G; Adeyemo WL; Schicho K; Figl M; Enislidis G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(5):801-7. PubMed ID: 17974116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Flapless implant surgery: review of the literature and report of 2 cases with computer-guided surgical approach.
    Azari A; Nikzad S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 May; 66(5):1015-21. PubMed ID: 18423295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
    Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The use of a computerized tomography-based software program with a flapless surgical technique in implant dentistry: a case report.
    Terzioğlu H; Akkaya M; Ozan O
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 19344037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. The intrinsic error of a stereolithographic surgical template in implant guided surgery.
    Cassetta M; Di Mambro A; Giansanti M; Stefanelli LV; Cavallini C
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2013 Feb; 42(2):264-75. PubMed ID: 22789635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reliability of preoperative planning of an image-guided system for oral implant placement based on 3-dimensional images: an in vivo study.
    Fortin T; Bosson JL; Coudert JL; Isidori M
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(6):886-93. PubMed ID: 14696665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The use of computer-guided flapless implant surgery and four implants placed in immediate function to support a fixed denture: preliminary results after a mean follow-up period of thirteen months.
    Malo P; de Araujo Nobre M; Lopes A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2007 Jun; 97(6 Suppl):S26-34. PubMed ID: 17618930
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.