These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23998163)

  • 81. Osseointegration of oxidized and turned implants in circumferential bone defects with and without adjunctive therapies: an experimental study on BMP-2 and autogenous bone graft in the dog mandible.
    Salata LA; Burgos PM; Rasmusson L; Novaes AB; Papalexiou V; Dahlin C; Sennerby L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jan; 36(1):62-71. PubMed ID: 17027235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 82. Histomorphometric and fluorescence microscopic evaluation of interfacial bone healing around 3 different dental implants before and after radiation therapy.
    Weinlaender M; Beumer J; Kenney EB; Lekovic V; Holmes R; Moy PK; Plenk H
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2006; 21(2):212-24. PubMed ID: 16634491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 83. A study of the bone healing kinetics of plateau versus screw root design titanium dental implants.
    Leonard G; Coelho P; Polyzois I; Stassen L; Claffey N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Mar; 20(3):232-9. PubMed ID: 19397634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 84. Effect of drilling technique on the early integration of plateau root form endosteal implants: an experimental study in dogs.
    Giro G; Marin C; Granato R; Bonfante EA; Suzuki M; Janal MN; Coelho PG
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2011 Aug; 69(8):2158-63. PubMed ID: 21530048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 85. Comparison of submerged and nonsubmerged implants placed without flap reflection in the canine mandible.
    Choi BH; Li J; Kim HS; Ko CY; Jeong SM; Xuan F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 May; 105(5):561-5. PubMed ID: 18299237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 86. Bone formation at recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2-coated titanium implants in the posterior mandible (Type II bone) in dogs.
    Wikesjö UM; Xiropaidis AV; Qahash M; Lim WH; Sorensen RG; Rohrer MD; Wozney JM; Hall J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2008 Nov; 35(11):985-91. PubMed ID: 18976395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 87. Comparison of peri-implant soft tissues in submerged versus transmucosal healing: A split mouth prospective immunohistochemical study.
    Martínez-González JM; Martín-Ares M; Martínez-Rodríguez N; Barona-Dorado C; Sanz-Alonso J; Cortés-Bretón-Brinkmann J; Ata-Ali J
    Arch Oral Biol; 2018 Jun; 90():61-66. PubMed ID: 29549712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 88. Hard and soft tissue responses to implant made of three different materials with microgrooved collar in a dog model.
    Igarashi K; Nakahara K; Kobayashi E; Watanabe F; Haga-Tsujimura M
    Dent Mater J; 2018 Nov; 37(6):964-972. PubMed ID: 29998938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 89. Initial healing in the dog of submerged versus non-submerged porous-coated endosseous dental implants.
    Levy D; Deporter DA; Pilliar RM; Watson PA; Valiquette N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Jun; 7(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9002828
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 90. Biologic Width around one- and two-piece titanium implants.
    Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Schoolfield JD; Cochran DL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Dec; 12(6):559-71. PubMed ID: 11737099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 91. [Systematic qualitative histology of enossal implants with anodically oxidised surfaces].
    Al-Nawas B; Grötz KA; Goetz H; Feil M; Duschner H; Wagner W
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2006 Jul; 10(4):229-37. PubMed ID: 16770640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 92. Zirconia compared to titanium dental implants in preclinical studies-A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Roehling S; Schlegel KA; Woelfler H; Gahlert M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 May; 30(5):365-395. PubMed ID: 30916812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 93. Histological and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Zirconia Dental Implants Modified by Femtosecond Laser versus Titanium Implants: An Experimental Study in Fox Hound Dogs.
    Calvo-Guirado JL; Aguilar-Salvatierra A; Delgado-Ruiz RA; Negri B; Fernández MP; Maté Sánchez de Val JE; Gómez-Moreno G; Romanos GE
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Jun; 17(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 24138572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 94. Comparison of surface modified zirconia implants with commercially available zirconium and titanium implants: a histological study in pigs.
    Gredes T; Kubasiewicz-Ross P; Gedrange T; Dominiak M; Kunert-Keil C
    Implant Dent; 2014 Aug; 23(4):502-7. PubMed ID: 25025856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 95. Early Periimplant Tissue Healing on 1-Piece Implants With a Concave Transmucosal Design: A Histomorphometric Study in Dogs.
    Bolle C; Gustin MP; Fau D; Exbrayat P; Boivin G; Grosgogeat B
    Implant Dent; 2015 Oct; 24(5):598-606. PubMed ID: 26280485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 96. Periimplant soft tissue barrier at experimental one-piece mini-implants with different surface topography in humans: A light-microscopic overview and histometric analysis.
    Glauser R; Schüpbach P; Gottlow J; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2005; 7 Suppl 1():S44-51. PubMed ID: 16137087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 97. Comparison of clinical performance of zirconia implants and titanium implants in animal models: a systematic review.
    Manzano G; Herrero LR; Montero J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):311-20. PubMed ID: 24683556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 98. Temporal sequence of hard and soft tissue healing around titanium dental implants.
    Salvi GE; Bosshardt DD; Lang NP; Abrahamsson I; Berglundh T; Lindhe J; Ivanovski S; Donos N
    Periodontol 2000; 2015 Jun; 68(1):135-52. PubMed ID: 25867984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 99. Osseointegration of zirconia implants compared with titanium: an in vivo study.
    Depprich R; Zipprich H; Ommerborn M; Naujoks C; Wiesmann HP; Kiattavorncharoen S; Lauer HC; Meyer U; Kübler NR; Handschel J
    Head Face Med; 2008 Dec; 4():30. PubMed ID: 19077228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 100. Bone Tissue Responses to Zirconia Implants Modified by Biomimetic Coating Incorporated with BMP-2.
    Teng F; Zheng Y; Wu G; Beekmans B; Wismeijer D; Lin X; Liu Y
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2019; 39(3):371-379. PubMed ID: 30986287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.