These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

314 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23998625)

  • 1. Occlusal errors generated at the maxillary incisal edge position related to discrepancies in the arbitrary horizontal axis location and to the thickness of the interocclusal record.
    Kois JC; Kois DE; Chaiyabutr Y
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Nov; 110(5):414-9. PubMed ID: 23998625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. To the editor: "occlusal errors generated at the maxillary incisal edge position related to discrepancies in the arbitrary horizontal axis location and to the thickness of the interocclusal record.”.
    Thompson GA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct; 112(4):703. PubMed ID: 24840908
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Kois Dento-Facial Analyzer System with an earbow for mounting a maxillary cast.
    Lux LH; Thompson GA; Waliszewski KJ; Ziebert GJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Sep; 114(3):432-9. PubMed ID: 25979448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Occlusal plane discrepancies generated by transverse horizontal axis deviations.
    Bowley JF; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Jul; 86(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 11458264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of two face-bow/semi-adjustable articulator systems in transferring the maxillary occlusal cant.
    Nazir N; Sujesh M; Kumar R; Sreenivas P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):437-42. PubMed ID: 23257473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of occlusal vertical dimension on lip positions at smile.
    Chou JC; Thompson GA; Aggarwal HA; Bosio JA; Irelan JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):533-9. PubMed ID: 24836283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two arbitrary cast transfer systems with a kinematic facebow for mounting a maxillary cast on a semiadjustable articulator.
    Thompson GA; Nick C; Francisco P; Lux L; Wiens JP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Oct; 128(4):597-603. PubMed ID: 33736862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of arbitrary and mean transfer of dental casts to the articulator on centric occlusal errors.
    Morneburg TR; Pröschel PA
    Clin Oral Investig; 2011 Jun; 15(3):427-34. PubMed ID: 20336474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional analysis of the occlusal plane related to the hamular-incisive-papilla occlusal plane in young adults.
    Fu PS; Hung CC; Hong JM; Wang JC
    J Oral Rehabil; 2007 Feb; 34(2):136-40. PubMed ID: 17244236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A comparison of facebow and dentofacial analyzer mountings.
    Galanis A; Ali M; Belles D; Koeppen RG
    Tex Dent J; 2013 Oct; 130(10):1047-53. PubMed ID: 24354168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of an improved orthognathic articulator system. 2. Accuracy of occlusal wafers.
    Paul PE; Barbenel JC; Walker FS; Khambay BS; Moos KF; Ayoub AF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Feb; 41(2):155-9. PubMed ID: 22047954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the accuracy of a 3-dimensional virtual method and the conventional method for transferring the maxillary cast to a virtual articulator.
    Solaberrieta E; Mínguez R; Barrenetxea L; Otegi JR; Szentpétery A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Mar; 113(3):191-7. PubMed ID: 25557006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative tests of arbitrary and kinematic transverse horizontal axis recordings of mandibular movements.
    Bernhardt O; Küppers N; Rosin M; Meyer G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Feb; 89(2):175-9. PubMed ID: 12616238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Does the available interocclusal space influence the accuracy of the maxillomandibular relationship captured with an intraoral scanner?
    Revilla-León M; Gómez-Polo M; Zeitler JM; Barmak AB; Kois JC; Pérez-Barquero JA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Aug; 132(2):435-440. PubMed ID: 36349566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of a conventional and virtual occlusal record.
    Solaberrieta E; Otegi JR; Goicoechea N; Brizuela A; Pradies G
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jul; 114(1):92-7. PubMed ID: 25858220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guidelines for maxillary incisal edge position-a pilot study: the key is the canine.
    Misch CE
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Feb; 17(2):130-134. PubMed ID: 17971111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparing maximum intercuspal contacts of virtual dental patients and mounted dental casts.
    Delong R; Ko CC; Anderson GC; Hodges JS; Douglas WH
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Dec; 88(6):622-30. PubMed ID: 12488856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An in vitro study into the accuracy of a novel method for recording the mandibular transverse horizontal axis.
    Keeling AJ; Brunton PA; Holt RJ
    J Dent; 2014 Feb; 42(2):122-8. PubMed ID: 24315880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Relationship between occlusal plane and masticatory path in youth with individual normal occlusion].
    Lin XF; Li SH; Huang ZS; Wu XY
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Jun; 45(6):370-5. PubMed ID: 21163016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison between incisal embrasures of natural and prosthetically restored maxillary anterior teeth.
    Baharav H; Kupershmit I; Oman M; Cardash H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Mar; 101(3):200-4. PubMed ID: 19231573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.