151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23999026)
21. A PET system design by using mixed detectors: resolution properties.
Liu J; Kao CM; Gu S; Xiao P; Xie Q
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Jul; 59(13):3517-32. PubMed ID: 24910321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. A new virtual ring-based system matrix generator for iterative image reconstruction in high resolution small volume PET systems.
Li K; Safavi-Naeini M; Franklin DR; Han Z; Rosenfeld AB; Hutton B; Lerch ML
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Sep; 60(17):6949-73. PubMed ID: 26305868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The Impact of Positron Range on PET Resolution, Evaluated with Phantoms and PHITS Monte Carlo Simulations for Conventional and Non-conventional Radionuclides.
Carter LM; Kesner AL; Pratt EC; Sanders VA; Massicano AVF; Cutler CS; Lapi SE; Lewis JS
Mol Imaging Biol; 2020 Feb; 22(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 31001765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Study of a high-resolution PET system using a silicon detector probe.
Brzeziński K; Oliver JF; Gillam J; Rafecas M
Phys Med Biol; 2014 Oct; 59(20):6117-40. PubMed ID: 25254926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Open-field mouse brain PET: design optimisation and detector characterisation.
Kyme AZ; Judenhofer MS; Gong K; Bec J; Selfridge A; Du J; Qi J; Cherry SR; Meikle SR
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jul; 62(15):6207-6225. PubMed ID: 28475491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Performance evaluation of developed dedicated breast PET scanner and improvement of the spatial resolution by wobbling: a Monte Carlo study.
Emami A; Ghadiri H; Ghafarian P; Geramifar P; Ay MR
Jpn J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):790-799. PubMed ID: 32253654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Physical performance of a long axial field-of-view PET scanner prototype with sparse rings configuration: A Monte Carlo simulation study.
Zein SA; Karakatsanis NA; Issa M; Haj-Ali AA; Nehmeh SA
Med Phys; 2020 Apr; 47(4):1949-1957. PubMed ID: 31985827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Simulation study of a D-shape PET scanner for improved sensitivity and reduced cost in whole-body imaging.
Ahmed AM; Tashima H; Yamaya T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 May; 62(10):4107-4117. PubMed ID: 28327473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Design of a very high-resolution small animal PET scanner using a silicon scatter detector insert.
Park SJ; Rogers WL; Clinthorne NH
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Aug; 52(15):4653-77. PubMed ID: 17634656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. A Monte Carlo investigation of the spatial resolution performance of a small-animal PET scanner designed for mouse brain imaging studies.
Rodríguez-Villafuerte M; Yang Y; Cherry SR
Phys Med; 2014 Feb; 30(1):76-85. PubMed ID: 23566478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Performance comparison of a dedicated total breast PET system with a clinical whole-body PET system: a simulation study.
Samanta S; Jiang J; Hamdi M; Register AZ; Majewski S; Williams MB; Turkington TG; Tornai MP; Laforest R; O'Sullivan JA; Tai YC
Phys Med Biol; 2021 May; 66(11):. PubMed ID: 33892480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. ALBIRA: a small animal PET∕SPECT∕CT imaging system.
Sánchez F; Orero A; Soriano A; Correcher C; Conde P; González A; Hernández L; Moliner L; Rodríguez-Alvarez MJ; Vidal LF; Benlloch JM; Chapman SE; Leevy WM
Med Phys; 2013 May; 40(5):051906. PubMed ID: 23635276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. GATE Monte Carlo simulations for variations of an integrated PET/MR hybrid imaging system based on the Biograph mMR model.
Aklan B; Jakoby BW; Watson CC; Braun H; Ritt P; Quick HH
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jun; 60(12):4731-52. PubMed ID: 26040657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Simulation study of spatial resolution and sensitivity for the tapered depth of interaction PET detectors for small animal imaging.
St James S; Yang Y; Bowen SL; Qi J; Cherry SR
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Jan; 55(2):N63-74. PubMed ID: 20023331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. 2D linear and iterative reconstruction algorithms for a PET-insert scanner.
Pal D; O'sullivan JA; Wu H; Janecek M; Tai YC
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(14):4293-310. PubMed ID: 17664609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Multi-site quality and variability analysis of 3D FDG PET segmentations based on phantom and clinical image data.
Beichel RR; Smith BJ; Bauer C; Ulrich EJ; Ahmadvand P; Budzevich MM; Gillies RJ; Goldgof D; Grkovski M; Hamarneh G; Huang Q; Kinahan PE; Laymon CM; Mountz JM; Muzi JP; Muzi M; Nehmeh S; Oborski MJ; Tan Y; Zhao B; Sunderland JJ; Buatti JM
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):479-496. PubMed ID: 28205306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Study of the performance of a novel 1 mm resolution dual-panel PET camera design dedicated to breast cancer imaging using Monte Carlo simulation.
Zhang J; Olcott PD; Chinn G; Foudray AM; Levine CS
Med Phys; 2007 Feb; 34(2):689-702. PubMed ID: 17388187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Simulation study comparing the helmet-chin PET with a cylindrical PET of the same number of detectors.
Ahmed AM; Tashima H; Yoshida E; Nishikido F; Yamaya T
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 62(11):4541-4550. PubMed ID: 28489608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A Prototype High-Resolution Small-Animal PET Scanner Dedicated to Mouse Brain Imaging.
Yang Y; Bec J; Zhou J; Zhang M; Judenhofer MS; Bai X; Di K; Wu Y; Rodriguez M; Dokhale P; Shah KS; Farrell R; Qi J; Cherry SR
J Nucl Med; 2016 Jul; 57(7):1130-5. PubMed ID: 27013696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Accurate Monte Carlo modeling and performance assessment of the X-PET subsystem of the FLEX triumph preclinical PET/CT scanner.
Zeraatkar N; Ay MR; Kamali-Asl AR; Zaidi H
Med Phys; 2011 Mar; 38(3):1217-25. PubMed ID: 21520834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
