60 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23999072)
1. Solid anthropomorphic infant whole-body DXA phantom: design, evaluation, and multisite testing.
Shypailo RJ; Ellis KJ
Pediatr Res; 2013 Nov; 74(5):486-93. PubMed ID: 23999072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A DXA Whole Body Composition Cross-Calibration Experience: Evaluation With Humans, Spine, and Whole Body Phantoms.
Krueger D; Libber J; Sanfilippo J; Yu HJ; Horvath B; Miller CG; Binkley N
J Clin Densitom; 2016; 19(2):220-5. PubMed ID: 26071169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Between-centre variability versus variability over time in DXA whole body measurements evaluated using a whole body phantom.
Louis O; Verlinde S; Thomas M; De Schepper J
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):431-4. PubMed ID: 16513312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Body composition analysis by dual X-ray absorptiometry: in vivo and in vitro comparison of three different fan-beam instruments.
Aasen G; Fagertun H; Halse J
Scand J Clin Lab Invest; 2006; 66(8):659-66. PubMed ID: 17101558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. DXA body composition corrective factors between Hologic Discovery models to conduct multicenter studies.
Sutter T; Duboeuf F; Chapurlat R; Cortet B; Lespessailles E; Roux JP
Bone; 2021 Jan; 142():115683. PubMed ID: 33045389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of body composition measurements obtained by two fan-beam DXA instruments.
Sakai Y; Ito H; Meno T; Numata M; Jingu S
J Clin Densitom; 2006; 9(2):191-7. PubMed ID: 16785080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cross calibration of Hologic QDR2000 and GE lunar prodigy for whole body bone mineral density and body composition measurements.
Pearson D; Horton B; Green DJ
J Clin Densitom; 2011; 14(3):294-301. PubMed ID: 21600823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) by comparison with chemical analysis of dogs and cats.
Speakman JR; Booles D; Butterwick R
Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord; 2001 Mar; 25(3):439-47. PubMed ID: 11319644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phantoms for cross-calibration of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry measurements in infants.
Hammami M; Picaud JC; Fusch C; Hockman EM; Rigo J; Koo WW
J Am Coll Nutr; 2002 Aug; 21(4):328-32. PubMed ID: 12166529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Improvement in the accuracy of dual energy x-ray absorptiometry for whole body and regional analysis of body composition: validation using piglets and methodologic considerations in infants.
Brunton JA; Weiler HA; Atkinson SA
Pediatr Res; 1997 Apr; 41(4 Pt 1):590-6. PubMed ID: 9098865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Bone mineral and body composition measurements: cross-calibration of pencil-beam and fan-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers.
Ellis KJ; Shypailo RJ
J Bone Miner Res; 1998 Oct; 13(10):1613-8. PubMed ID: 9783550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparisons between Hologic, Lunar and Norland dual-energy X-ray absorptiometers and other techniques used for whole-body soft tissue measurements.
Tothill P; Avenell A; Love J; Reid DM
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1994 Nov; 48(11):781-94. PubMed ID: 7859696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Do Textiles Impact DXA Bone Density or Body Composition Results?
Siglinsky E; Binkley N; Krueger D
J Clin Densitom; 2018; 21(2):303-307. PubMed ID: 28988694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Body composition in taller individuals using DXA: A validation study for athletic and non-athletic populations.
Santos DA; Gobbo LA; Matias CN; Petroski EL; Gonçalves EM; Cyrino ES; Minderico CS; Sardinha LB; Silva AM
J Sports Sci; 2013; 31(4):405-13. PubMed ID: 23092580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. First all-solid pediatric phantom for dual X-ray absorptiometry measurements in infants.
Picaud JC; Duboeuf F; Vey-Marty V; Delams P; Claris O; Salle BL; Rigo J
J Clin Densitom; 2003; 6(1):17-23. PubMed ID: 12665698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Technical considerations of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry-based bone mineral measurements for pediatric studies.
Koo WW; Walters J; Bush AJ
J Bone Miner Res; 1995 Dec; 10(12):1998-2004. PubMed ID: 8619381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Inaccuracies inherent in patient-specific dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry bone mineral density measurements: comprehensive phantom-based evaluation.
Bolotin HH; Sievänen H; Grashuis JL; Kuiper JW; Järvinen TL
J Bone Miner Res; 2001 Feb; 16(2):417-26. PubMed ID: 11204442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparisons between fat measurements by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, underwater weighing and magnetic resonance imaging in healthy women.
Tothill P; Han TS; Avenell A; McNeill G; Reid DM
Eur J Clin Nutr; 1996 Nov; 50(11):747-52. PubMed ID: 8933122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of a new body composition phantom for quality control and cross-calibration of DXA devices.
Diessel E; Fuerst T; Njeh CF; Tylavsky F; Cauley J; Dockrell M; Genant HK
J Appl Physiol (1985); 2000 Aug; 89(2):599-605. PubMed ID: 10926643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Patient-specific DXA bone mineral density inaccuracies: quantitative effects of nonuniform extraosseous fat distributions.
Bolotin HH; Sievänen H; Grashuis JL
J Bone Miner Res; 2003 Jun; 18(6):1020-7. PubMed ID: 12817754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
