These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
306 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 23999422)
1. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor. Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial. Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated and 2 hourly static oral misoprostol solution for induction of labor. Rouzi AA; Alsahly N; Alamoudi R; Almansouri N; Alsinani N; Alkafy S; Rozzah R; Abduljabbar H Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):405.e1-405.e6. PubMed ID: 27986461 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Titrated oral compared with vaginal misoprostol for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Cheng SY; Ming H; Lee JC Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Jan; 111(1):119-25. PubMed ID: 18165400 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone. Matonhodze BB; Hofmeyr GJ; Levin J S Afr Med J; 2003 May; 93(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 12830603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative study of titrated oral misoprostol solution and vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term pregnancy. Wang X; Yang A; Ma Q; Li X; Qin L; He T Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Sep; 294(3):495-503. PubMed ID: 26746850 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial. Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison]. Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone. Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial. Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial. Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour. Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of oral misoprostol tablets and vaginal prostaglandin E2 pessary in induction of labour at term. Hassan AA J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 May; 15(5):284-7. PubMed ID: 15907239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial. Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Misoprostol for induction of labour at term: a more effective agent than dinoprostone vaginal gel. Danielian P; Porter B; Ferri N; Summers J; Templeton A Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1999 Aug; 106(8):793-7. PubMed ID: 10453828 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone--is it effective and safe? Huber G; Schütz H; Seelbach-Göbel B J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jun; 28(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 25001425 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction. Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A prospective double blind study using oral versus vaginal misoprostol for labour induction. Mehrotra S; Singh U; Gupta HP J Obstet Gynaecol; 2010; 30(5):461-4. PubMed ID: 20604647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]