These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2399943)

  • 1. Present status and outlook of the implantable hearing aid.
    Gyo K; Yanagihara N; Saiki T; Hinohira Y
    Am J Otol; 1990 Jul; 11(4):250-3. PubMed ID: 2399943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Partially implantable hearing aid using piezoelectric ceramic ossicular vibrator. Results of the implant operation and assessment of the hearing afforded by the device.
    Yanagihara N; Gyo K; Hinohira Y
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):85-97. PubMed ID: 7739871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Implantable hearing aid in fourteen patients with mixed deafness.
    Yanagihara N; Gyo K; Sato H; Yamanaka E; Saiki T
    Acta Otolaryngol Suppl; 1988; 458():90-4. PubMed ID: 3245439
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Implantable hearing aid using an ossicular vibrator composed of a piezoelectric ceramic bimorph: application to four patients.
    Yanagihara N; Yamanaka E; Gyo K
    Am J Otol; 1987 May; 8(3):213-9. PubMed ID: 3631222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Surgical rehabilitation of deafness with partially implantable hearing aid using piezoelectric ceramic bimorpli ossicular vibrator.
    Yanagihara N; Hinohira Y; Gyo K
    Auris Nasus Larynx; 1997; 24(1):91-8. PubMed ID: 9148734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Perception of sound through direct oscillation of the stapes using a piezoelectric ceramic bimorph.
    Yanagihara N; Gyo K; Suzuki K; Araki H
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 1983; 92(3 Pt 1):223-7. PubMed ID: 6859740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Early clinical results: SOUNDTEC implantable hearing device phase II study.
    Hough JV; Dyer RK; Matthews P; Wood MW
    Laryngoscope; 2001 Jan; 111(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 11192875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sound evaluation of partially implantable piezoelectric middle ear implant: comparative study of frequency responses.
    Kodera K; Suzuki J; Nagai K; Yabe T
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):108-11. PubMed ID: 8168442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Clinical results with a percutaneous bone-anchored hearing aid.
    Abramson M; Fay TH; Kelly JP; Wazen JJ; Liden G; Tjellstrom A
    Laryngoscope; 1989 Jul; 99(7 Pt 1):707-10. PubMed ID: 2747393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Speech recognition with the bone-anchored hearing aid determined objectively and subjectively.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Ear Nose Throat J; 1994 Feb; 73(2):115-7. PubMed ID: 8168444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Communicative ability in an audiological perspective. Theory and application to post-secondary school students.
    Borg E; Samuelsson E; Danermark B; Rönnberg J
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1999; 50():i-iv, 1-36. PubMed ID: 10810771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A method to establish the effect of the hearing aid in noise using Victoreen signal threshold and speech discrimination.
    Lindström B; Svärd I; Bredberg G; Lundborg T
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1983; 18():45-55. PubMed ID: 6577574
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. New developments in speech pattern element hearing aids for the profoundly deaf.
    Faulkner A; Walliker JR; Howard IS; Ball V; Fourcin AJ
    Scand Audiol Suppl; 1993; 38():124-35. PubMed ID: 8153558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [An experimental study of middle ear implantable hearing device].
    Ni D; Song M; Liang X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 1995 Jun; 75(6):360-2, 384. PubMed ID: 7553150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Long-term results with the titanium bone-anchored hearing aid: the U.S. experience.
    Wazen JJ; Caruso M; Tjellstrom A
    Am J Otol; 1998 Nov; 19(6):737-41. PubMed ID: 9831146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The bone-anchored hearing aid compared with conventional hearing aids. Audiologic results and the patients' opinions.
    Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1995 Feb; 28(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 7739870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Full time directional versus user selectable microphone modes in hearing aids.
    Ricketts T; Henry P; Gnewikow D
    Ear Hear; 2003 Oct; 24(5):424-39. PubMed ID: 14534412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Speech reception thresholds in noise and self-reported hearing disability in a general adult population.
    Smits C; Kramer SE; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):538-49. PubMed ID: 16957503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.