These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24000168)

  • 1. Expert testimony on eyewitness evidence: in search of common sense.
    Houston KA; Hope L; Memon A; Don Read J
    Behav Sci Law; 2013; 31(5):637-51. PubMed ID: 24000168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expert psychological testimony on eyewitness reliability before and after Daubert: the state of the law and the science.
    Penrod SD; Fulero SM; Cutler BL
    Behav Sci Law; 1995; 13(2):229-59. PubMed ID: 10150378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Timing of eyewitness expert testimony, jurors' need for cognition, and case strength as determinants of trial verdicts.
    Leippe MR; Eisenstadt D; Rauch SM; Seib HM
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Jun; 89(3):524-41. PubMed ID: 15161410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can the effectiveness of eyewitness expert testimony be improved?
    Wise RA; Kehn A
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2020; 27(2):315-330. PubMed ID: 32944129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of eyewitness expert evidence and judicial instruction on juror ability to evaluate eyewitness testimony.
    Martire KA; Kemp RI
    Law Hum Behav; 2009 Jun; 33(3):225-36. PubMed ID: 18597165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Potential jurors' opinions on the effects of hypnosis on eyewitness identification: a brief communication.
    Labelle L; Lamarche MC; Laurence JR
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Oct; 38(4):315-9. PubMed ID: 2258247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Eyewitness testimony: tracing the beliefs of Swedish legal professionals.
    Granhag PA; Strömwall LA; Hartwig M
    Behav Sci Law; 2005; 23(5):709-27. PubMed ID: 16170786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Legal Professionals' Knowledge of Eyewitness Testimony in China: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
    Jiang L; Luo D
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(2):e0148116. PubMed ID: 26828933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Secondary confessions: the influence (or lack thereof) of incentive size and scientific expert testimony on jurors' perceptions of informant testimony.
    Maeder EM; Pica E
    Law Hum Behav; 2014 Dec; 38(6):560-8. PubMed ID: 25180762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Educating jurors about eyewitness testimony in criminal cases with circumstantial and forensic evidence.
    Safer MA; Murphy RP; Wise RA; Bussey L; Millett C; Holfeld B
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2016; 47():86-92. PubMed ID: 27037161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [A nationwide questionnaire survey of medical experts in mental health evaluation].
    Koike J; Morita N; Nakatani Y
    Seishin Shinkeigaku Zasshi; 2009; 111(1):10-23. PubMed ID: 19301591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of defense-only and opposing eyewitness experts on juror judgments.
    Devenport JL; Cutler BL
    Law Hum Behav; 2004 Oct; 28(5):569-76. PubMed ID: 15638210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. An examination of the causes and solutions to eyewitness error.
    Wise RA; Sartori G; Magnussen S; Safer MA
    Front Psychiatry; 2014; 5():102. PubMed ID: 25165459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Asking the gatekeepers: a national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world.
    Gatowski SI; Dobbin SA; Richardson JT; Ginsburg GP; Merlino ML; Dahir V
    Law Hum Behav; 2001 Oct; 25(5):433-58. PubMed ID: 11688367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Do jurors "know" what isn't so about child witnesses?
    Quas JA; Thompson WC; Alison K; Stewart C
    Law Hum Behav; 2005 Aug; 29(4):425-56. PubMed ID: 16133948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The CSI effect and the Canadian and the Australian Jury.
    Holmgren JA; Fordham J
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56 Suppl 1():S63-71. PubMed ID: 21155799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Norwegian judges' knowledge of factors affecting eyewitness testimony: a 12-year follow-up.
    Bjørndal LD; McGill L; Magnussen S; Richardson S; Saraiva R; Stadel M; Brennen T
    Psychiatr Psychol Law; 2021; 28(5):665-682. PubMed ID: 35571598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eyewitness Evidence: Improving Its Probative Value.
    Wells GL; Memon A; Penrod SD
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Nov; 7(2):45-75. PubMed ID: 26158855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. On the "general acceptance" of eyewitness testimony research. A new survey of the experts.
    Kassin SM; Tubb VA; Hosch HM; Memon A
    Am Psychol; 2001 May; 56(5):405-16. PubMed ID: 11355363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Can expert testimony sensitize jurors to variations in confession evidence?
    Henderson KS; Levett LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2016 Dec; 40(6):638-649. PubMed ID: 27243361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.