These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24000168)

  • 21. Juror and expert conceptions of battered women.
    Dodge M; Greene E
    Violence Vict; 1991; 6(4):271-82. PubMed ID: 1822697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluating witness testimony: Juror knowledge, false memory, and the utility of evidence-based directions.
    Helm RK
    Int J Evid Proof; 2021 Oct; 25(4):264-285. PubMed ID: 34658655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. "Certainty" and expert mental health opinions in legal proceedings.
    Drogin EY; Commons ML; Gutheil TG; Meyer DJ; Norris DM
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2012; 35(5-6):348-53. PubMed ID: 23022469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of confidence and method of questioning on eyewitness testimony.
    Venter A; Louw DA
    Med Law; 2005 Jun; 24(2):369-89. PubMed ID: 16082872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Expert testimony in capital sentencing: juror responses.
    Montgomery JH; Ciccone JR; Garvey SP; Eisenberg T
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):509-18. PubMed ID: 16394228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. The effects of rational and experiential information processing of expert testimony in death penalty cases.
    Krauss DA; Lieberman JD; Olson J
    Behav Sci Law; 2004; 22(6):801-22. PubMed ID: 15568199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effects of stress on eyewitness memory: A survey of memory experts and laypeople.
    Marr C; Otgaar H; Sauerland M; Quaedflieg CWEM; Hope L
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Apr; 49(3):401-421. PubMed ID: 33237488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Science in the jury box: jurors' comprehension of mitochondrial DNA evidence.
    Hans VP; Kaye DH; Dann BM; Farley EJ; Albertson S
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Feb; 35(1):60-71. PubMed ID: 20461543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Eyewitness testimony and perceived credibility of youth with mild intellectual disability.
    Peled M; Iarocci G; Connolly DA
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2004 Oct; 48(Pt 7):699-703. PubMed ID: 15357691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Eyewitness recall: Regulation of grain size and the role of confidence.
    Weber N; Brewer N
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Mar; 14(1):50-60. PubMed ID: 18377166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. After 30 years, what do we know about what jurors know? A meta-analytic review of lay knowledge regarding eyewitness factors.
    Desmarais SL; Don Read J
    Law Hum Behav; 2011 Jun; 35(3):200-10. PubMed ID: 20461542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony.
    Merlino ML; Murray CI; Richardson JT
    Behav Sci Law; 2008; 26(2):187-206. PubMed ID: 18344168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Neurolitigation: a perspective on the elements of expert testimony for extending the Daubert challenge.
    Klee CH; Friedman HJ
    NeuroRehabilitation; 2001; 16(2):79-85. PubMed ID: 11568465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Method of questioning and the accuracy of eyewitness testimony.
    Venter A; Louw DA
    Med Law; 2005 Mar; 24(1):61-79. PubMed ID: 15887614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effect of the deliberation process and jurors' prior legal knowledge on the sentence: the role of psychological expertise and crime scene photo.
    Finkelstein R; Bastounis M
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(3):426-41. PubMed ID: 20014448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Reality check: a comparison of college students and a community sample of mock jurors in a simulated sexual violent predator civil commitment.
    McCabe JG; Krauss DA; Lieberman JD
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):730-50. PubMed ID: 19856483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Enhancing the credibility of complainants in child sexual assault trials: the effect of expert evidence and judicial directions.
    Goodman-Delahunty J; Cossins A; O'Brien K
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(6):769-83. PubMed ID: 21110393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gender bias and judicial decisions of undue influence in testamentary challenges.
    Recupero PR; Christopher PP; Strong DR; Price M; Harms SE
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2015 Mar; 43(1):60-8. PubMed ID: 25770281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Jury bias and psychiatric experts: judges' impressions of international medical graduates as expert witnesses.
    Reid WH; Durgam S
    J Psychiatr Pract; 2007 May; 13(3):190-4. PubMed ID: 17522563
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.