These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24000906)

  • 1. The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning.
    Uengoer M; Lotz A; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2013 Oct; 39(4):323-33. PubMed ID: 24000906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The fate of redundant cues in human predictive learning: The outcome ratio effect.
    Uengoer M; Lachnit H; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Aug; 72(8):1945-1960. PubMed ID: 30654727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The fate of redundant cues during blocking and a simple discrimination.
    Pearce JM; Dopson JC; Haselgrove M; Esber GR
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2012 Apr; 38(2):167-79. PubMed ID: 22486755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The role of common elements in the redundancy effect.
    Uengoer M; Lachnit H; Pearce JM
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2020 Jul; 46(3):286-296. PubMed ID: 32730082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The fate of redundant cues: Further analysis of the redundancy effect.
    Jones PM; Pearce JM
    Learn Behav; 2015 Mar; 43(1):72-82. PubMed ID: 25537840
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The redundancy effect in human causal learning: No evidence for changes in selective attention.
    Jones PM; Zaksaite T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2018 Aug; 71(8):1748-1760. PubMed ID: 28695765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Transfer of associability and relational structure in human associative learning.
    Livesey EJ; Don HJ; Uengoer M; Thorwart A
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):125-142. PubMed ID: 30816735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Extracting functional equivalence from reversing contingencies.
    Liljeholm M; Balleine BW
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2010 Apr; 36(2):165-71. PubMed ID: 20384397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Aging and retrospective revaluation of causal learning.
    Mutter SA; Atchley AR; Plumlee LM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2012 Jan; 38(1):102-17. PubMed ID: 21843025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Curved saccade trajectories reveal conflicting predictions in associative learning.
    Koenig S; Lachnit H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Sep; 37(5):1164-77. PubMed ID: 21707209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The hide-and-seek of retrospective revaluation: recovery from blocking is context dependent in human causal learning.
    Boddez Y; Baeyens F; Hermans D; Beckers T
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):230-40. PubMed ID: 21319914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of an ambiguous-feature discrimination.
    Haselgrove M; Robinson J; Nelson A; Pearce JM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Nov; 61(11):1710-25. PubMed ID: 18942036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Uncertainty and blocking in human causal learning.
    Jones PM; Zaksaite T; Mitchell CJ
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Jan; 45(1):111-124. PubMed ID: 30604999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Memory for, and salience of, the unique features of similar stimuli in perceptual learning.
    Lavis Y; Kadib R; Mitchell C; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2011 Apr; 37(2):211-9. PubMed ID: 21517201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Enhancement of responding to A after A+/AX+ training: challenges for a comparator theory of learning.
    Esber GR; Pearce JM; Haselgrove M
    J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process; 2009 Oct; 35(4):485-97. PubMed ID: 19839701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Explaining learned predictiveness: Roles of attention and integration of associative structures.
    Rodríguez G; Hall G
    J Exp Psychol Anim Learn Cogn; 2019 Apr; 45(2):163-173. PubMed ID: 30945925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Superior discrimination between similar stimuli after simultaneous exposure.
    Mundy ME; Honey RC; Dwyer DM
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Jan; 62(1):18-25. PubMed ID: 18720275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neural correlates of cue predictiveness during intentional and incidental associative learning: A time-frequency study.
    Do Carmo-Blanco N; Allen JJB
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Sep; 143():80-87. PubMed ID: 31254544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing the automaticity of an attentional bias towards predictive cues in human associative learning.
    Luque D; Molinero S; Jevtović M; Beesley T
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 May; 73(5):762-780. PubMed ID: 31826714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Feedback-related brain potential activity complies with basic assumptions of associative learning theory.
    Luque D; López FJ; Marco-Pallares J; Càmara E; Rodríguez-Fornells A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 Apr; 24(4):794-808. PubMed ID: 21981667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.