143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24001467)
1. Safe induction of labour with low-dose misoprostol, but less effective than the conventional dinoprostone regimen.
Petersen JF; Bergholt T; Løkkegaard EC
Dan Med J; 2013 Sep; 60(9):A4706. PubMed ID: 24001467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparative efficacy and safety of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert in labor induction at term: a randomized trial.
Ozkan S; Calişkan E; Doğer E; Yücesoy I; Ozeren S; Vural B
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2009 Jul; 280(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 19034471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Oral misoprostol or vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Dällenbach P; Boulvain M; Viardot C; Irion O
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Jan; 188(1):162-7. PubMed ID: 12548212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A randomised controlled trial of low-dose misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal pessaries for cervical priming.
Tan TC; Yan SY; Chua TM; Biswas A; Chong YS
BJOG; 2010 Sep; 117(10):1270-7. PubMed ID: 20722643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Oral misoprostol for induction of labour.
Alfirevic Z; Aflaifel N; Weeks A
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Jun; 2014(6):CD001338. PubMed ID: 24924489
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Oral misoprostol against vaginal dinoprostone for labor induction at term: a randomized comparison].
Henrich W; Dudenhausen JW; Hanel C; Chen FC
Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol; 2008 Oct; 212(5):183-8. PubMed ID: 18956276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative study of misoprostol vs dinoprostone for induction of labour.
Kulshreshtha S; Sharma P; Mohan G; Singh S; Singh S
Indian J Physiol Pharmacol; 2007; 51(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 17877293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Maternal and neonatal outcome of labour induction at term comparing two regimens of misoprostol.
Kreft M; Krähenmann F; Roos M; Kurmanavicius J; Zimmermann R; Ochsenbein-Kölble N
J Perinat Med; 2014 Sep; 42(5):603-9. PubMed ID: 24633747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of labour in nulliparous and multiparous women: a UK, multicentre, open-label study of intravaginal misoprostol in comparison with dinoprostone.
Calder AA; Loughney AD; Weir CJ; Barber JW
BJOG; 2008 Sep; 115(10):1279-88. PubMed ID: 18715414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomised trial comparing low dose vaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone for labour induction.
van Gemund N; Scherjon S; LeCessie S; van Leeuwen JH; van Roosmalen J; Kanhai HH
BJOG; 2004 Jan; 111(1):42-9. PubMed ID: 14687051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Induction of labour with intravaginal misoprostol and prostaglandin E2 gel: a comparative study.
Nanda S; Singhal SR; Papneja A
Trop Doct; 2007 Jan; 37(1):21-4. PubMed ID: 17326881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of different doses of intravaginal misoprostol with intracervical dinoprostone for cervical ripening and labor induction.
Saxena P; Puri M; Bajaj M; Mishra A; Trivedi SS
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2011 Jul; 15(7):759-63. PubMed ID: 21780543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective review of pregnancy outcome after misoprostol (prostaglandin E1) induction of labour.
Fletcher H; Hutchinson S
West Indian Med J; 2001 Mar; 50(1):47-9. PubMed ID: 11398287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Efficacy and safety of misoprostol, dinoprostone and Cook's balloon for labour induction in women with foetal growth restriction at term.
Duro-Gómez J; Garrido-Oyarzún MF; Rodríguez-Marín AB; de la Torre González AJ; Arjona-Berral JE; Castelo-Branco C
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Oct; 296(4):777-781. PubMed ID: 28831553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Vaginal misoprostol for induction of labour: a more effective agent than prostaglandin F2 alpha gel and prostaglandin E2 pessary.
Majoko F; Zwizwai M; Nyström L; Lindmark G
Cent Afr J Med; 2002; 48(11-12):123-8. PubMed ID: 14562597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A randomised controlled trial of intravaginal dinoprostone, intravaginal misoprostol and transcervical balloon catheter for labour induction.
Prager M; Eneroth-Grimfors E; Edlund M; Marions L
BJOG; 2008 Oct; 115(11):1443-50. PubMed ID: 18715244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Misoprostol versus Dinoprostone for pre-induction cervical ripening at-term.
Chitrakar NS
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2012 Jan; 10(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 22929629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A randomized trial that compared intravaginal misoprostol and dinoprostone vaginal insert in pregnancies at high risk of fetal distress.
Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Sénat MV; Bretelle F; Paule Bonnal A; Ville Y
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 191(1):247-53. PubMed ID: 15295374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does Induction with Misoprostol Impact the Small for Gestational Age Neonate?
Foeller ME; Cruz MO; Kominiarek MA; Hibbard JU
Am J Perinatol; 2015 Dec; 32(14):1311-7. PubMed ID: 26352682
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Labour induction at term--a randomised trial comparing Foley catheter plus titrated oral misoprostol solution, titrated oral misoprostol solution alone, and dinoprostone.
Matonhodze BB; Hofmeyr GJ; Levin J
S Afr Med J; 2003 May; 93(5):375-9. PubMed ID: 12830603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
