BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24001467)

  • 21. Induction of labor in twin pregnancies with oral misoprostol versus vaginal dinoprostone--is it effective and safe?
    Huber G; Schütz H; Seelbach-Göbel B
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jun; 28(9):1043-6. PubMed ID: 25001425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Safety of misoprostol for near-term and term induction in small-for-gestational-age pregnancies compared to dinoprostone and primary cesarean section: results of a retrospective cohort study.
    Steetskamp J; Bachmann E; Hasenburg A; Battista MJ
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2020 Dec; 302(6):1369-1374. PubMed ID: 32761274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Induction of labor with high- or low-dosage oral misoprostol-A Danish descriptive retrospective cohort study 2015-16.
    Bendix JM; Friis Petersen J; Andersen BR; Bødker B; Løkkegaard EC
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Feb; 99(2):222-230. PubMed ID: 31557305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Randomized clinical trial between hourly titrated oral misoprostol and vaginal dinoprostone for induction of labor.
    Rouzi AA; Alsibiani S; Mansouri N; Alsinani N; Darhouse K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 210(1):56.e1-6. PubMed ID: 23999422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Titrated low-dose vaginal and/or oral misoprostol to induce labour for prelabour membrane rupture: a randomised trial.
    Bricker L; Peden H; Tomlinson AJ; Al-Hussaini TK; Idama T; Candelier C; Luckas M; Furniss H; Davies A; Kumar B; Roberts J; Alfirevic Z
    BJOG; 2008 Nov; 115(12):1503-11. PubMed ID: 18752586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Induction of labour with a viable infant: a randomised clinical trial comparing intravaginal misoprostol and intravaginal dinoprostone.
    Rozenberg P; Chevret S; Goffinet F; Durand-Zaleski I; Ville Y; Vayssiere C; Roberto A; Lahna Z; Nisand I; Fisch C; Chaumet-Riffaud P; Chastang C
    BJOG; 2001 Dec; 108(12):1255-62. PubMed ID: 11843388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Efficacy and safety of six hourly vaginal misoprostol versus intracervical dinoprostone: a randomized controlled trial.
    Denguezli W; Trimech A; Haddad A; Hajjaji A; Saidani Z; Faleh R; Sakouhi M
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Aug; 276(2):119-24. PubMed ID: 17219155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Foley catheter versus vaginal prostaglandin E2 gel for induction of labour at term (PROBAAT trial): an open-label, randomised controlled trial.
    Jozwiak M; Oude Rengerink K; Benthem M; van Beek E; Dijksterhuis MG; de Graaf IM; van Huizen ME; Oudijk MA; Papatsonis DN; Perquin DA; Porath M; van der Post JA; Rijnders RJ; Scheepers HC; Spaanderman ME; van Pampus MG; de Leeuw JW; Mol BW; Bloemenkamp KW;
    Lancet; 2011 Dec; 378(9809):2095-103. PubMed ID: 22030144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Medical indications of labor induction: a comparison between intravaginal misoprostol and intravenous prostaglandin E2].
    Jouatte F; Subtil D; Marquis P; Plennevaux JL; Puech F
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 2000 Dec; 29(8):763-771. PubMed ID: 11139713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of vaginal misoprostol tablets and prostaglandin E2 gel for the induction of labor in premature rupture of membranes at term: a randomized comparative trial.
    Chaudhuri S; Mitra SN; Banerjee PK; Biswas PK; Bhattacharyya S
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2011 Nov; 37(11):1564-71. PubMed ID: 21676083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Outpatient misoprostol compared with dinoprostone gel for preinduction cervical ripening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Meyer M; Pflum J; Howard D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Mar; 105(3):466-72. PubMed ID: 15738009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Vaginal misoprostol versus concentrated oxytocin and vaginal PGE2 for second-trimester labor induction.
    Ramsey PS; Savage K; Lincoln T; Owen J
    Obstet Gynecol; 2004 Jul; 104(1):138-45. PubMed ID: 15229013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Comparison of misoprostol and dinoprostone for elective induction of labour in nulliparous women at full term: a randomized prospective study.
    Papanikolaou EG; Plachouras N; Drougia A; Andronikou S; Vlachou C; Stefos T; Paraskevaidis E; Zikopoulos K
    Reprod Biol Endocrinol; 2004 Sep; 2():70. PubMed ID: 15450119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Safety and effectiveness of oral misoprostol for induction of labour in a resource-limited setting: a dose escalation study.
    Morris M; Bolnga JW; Verave O; Aipit J; Rero A; Laman M
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2017 Sep; 17(1):298. PubMed ID: 28886702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Vaginal misoprostol in managing premature rupture of membranes.
    Ayad IA
    East Mediterr Health J; 2002; 8(4-5):515-20. PubMed ID: 15603033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Labor outcomes of obese patients undergoing induction of labor with misoprostol compared to dinoprostone.
    Suidan RS; Rondon KC; Apuzzio JJ; Williams SF
    Am J Perinatol; 2015 Feb; 30(2):187-92. PubMed ID: 24915563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Concurrent use of Foley catheter and misoprostol for induction of labor: a randomized clinical trial of efficacy and safety.
    Lanka S; Surapaneni T; Nirmalan PK
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jun; 40(6):1527-33. PubMed ID: 24888911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Randomized controlled trial of vaginal misoprostol versus dinoprostone vaginal insert for labor induction.
    Garry D; Figueroa R; Kalish RB; Catalano CJ; Maulik D
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2003 Apr; 13(4):254-9. PubMed ID: 12854927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The effectiveness of misoprostol or dinoprostone in neonatal outcome after labour induction in post-term nulliparas.
    Soilemetzidis M; Pinidis P; Tsagias N; Ammari A; Liberis A; Liberis V; Galazios G; Tsikouras P
    Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2015; 42(5):649-52. PubMed ID: 26524816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Misoprostol 50 microg sublingually versus vaginally for labor induction at term: a randomized study.
    Caliskan E; Bodur H; Ozeren S; Corakci A; Ozkan S; Yucesoy I
    Gynecol Obstet Invest; 2005; 59(3):155-61. PubMed ID: 15640607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.