These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

319 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24001756)

  • 1. Mechanisms of target localization in visual change detection: an interplay of gating and filtering.
    Schneider D; Wascher E
    Behav Brain Res; 2013 Nov; 256():311-9. PubMed ID: 24001756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On the time course of bottom-up and top-down processes in selective visual attention: an EEG study.
    Schneider D; Beste C; Wascher E
    Psychophysiology; 2012 Nov; 49(11):1492-1503. PubMed ID: 22978270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predicting N2pc from anticipatory HbO activity during sustained visuospatial attention: a concurrent fNIRS-ERP study.
    Huang J; Wang F; Ding Y; Niu H; Tian F; Liu H; Song Y
    Neuroimage; 2015 Jun; 113():225-34. PubMed ID: 25818691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The attentional blink freezes spatial attention allocation to targets, not distractors: evidence from human electrophysiology.
    Pomerleau VJ; Fortier-Gauthier U; Corriveau I; McDonald JJ; Dell'Acqua R; Jolicœur P
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1559():33-45. PubMed ID: 24607298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.
    Huang W; Su Y; Zhen Y; Qu Z
    Psychophysiology; 2016 May; 53(5):650-62. PubMed ID: 26879628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Selecting and ignoring salient objects within and across dimensions in visual search.
    Schubö A; Müller HJ
    Brain Res; 2009 Aug; 1283():84-101. PubMed ID: 19501066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Irrelevant singletons in visual search do not capture attention but can produce nonspatial filtering costs.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):645-60. PubMed ID: 19929330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Time course of spatial and feature selective attention for partly-occluded objects.
    Kasai T; Takeya R
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Jul; 50(9):2281-9. PubMed ID: 22683447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Perceptual load affects spatial and nonspatial visual selection processes: an event-related brain potential study.
    Barnhardt J; Ritter W; Gomes H
    Neuropsychologia; 2008; 46(7):2071-8. PubMed ID: 18355882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention.
    Wykowska A; Schubö A
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2010 Apr; 22(4):640-54. PubMed ID: 19309292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Levels of visuo-spatial selection: an ERP study of negative priming.
    Gibbons H; Wiegleb N; Stahl J
    Brain Cogn; 2013 Nov; 83(2):203-17. PubMed ID: 24056236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effects of feature and spatial attention on visual change detection.
    Kimura M; Katayama J; Murohashi H
    Neuroreport; 2008 Feb; 19(3):389-92. PubMed ID: 18303587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Event-related Electroencephalographic Lateralizations Mark Individual Differences in Spatial and Nonspatial Visual Selection.
    Wiegand I; Napiórkowski N; Töllner T; Petersen A; Habekost T; Müller HJ; Finke K
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Apr; 30(4):482-497. PubMed ID: 29244636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Interactions between voluntary and stimulus-driven spatial attention mechanisms across sensory modalities.
    Santangelo V; Olivetti Belardinelli M; Spence C; Macaluso E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Dec; 21(12):2384-97. PubMed ID: 19199406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Dynamics of target and distractor processing in visual search: evidence from event-related brain potentials.
    Hilimire MR; Mounts JR; Parks NA; Corballis PM
    Neurosci Lett; 2011 May; 495(3):196-200. PubMed ID: 21457759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatio-temporal dynamics of visual selective attention identified by a common spatial pattern decomposition method.
    Li L; Yao D; Yin G
    Brain Res; 2009 Jul; 1282():84-94. PubMed ID: 19501069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lateralized irrelevant speech alters visuospatial selective attention mechanisms.
    Schaefer M; Tewes U; Münte TF; Johannes S
    Biol Psychol; 2006 Apr; 72(1):51-8. PubMed ID: 16188366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visuo-spatial processing and the N1 component of the ERP.
    Wascher E; Hoffmann S; Sänger J; Grosjean M
    Psychophysiology; 2009 Nov; 46(6):1270-7. PubMed ID: 19744158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Top-down feature-based selection of matching features for audio-visual synchrony discrimination.
    Fujisaki W; Nishida S
    Neurosci Lett; 2008 Mar; 433(3):225-30. PubMed ID: 18281153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.