These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 24001987)
1. Bayesian Image Reconstruction in Quantitative Photoacoustic Tomography. Tarvainen T; Pulkkinen A; Cox BT; Kaipio JP; Arridge SR IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2287-98. PubMed ID: 24001987 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantitative photoacoustic tomography using illuminations from a single direction. Pulkkinen A; Cox BT; Arridge SR; Kaipio JP; Tarvainen T J Biomed Opt; 2015 Mar; 20(3):036015. PubMed ID: 25803187 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Modelling of errors due to speed of sound variations in photoacoustic tomography using a Bayesian framework. Tick J; Pulkkinen A; Tarvainen T Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2019 Nov; 6(1):015003. PubMed ID: 33438591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Image reconstruction with the Heaviside equation in photoacoustic tomography accounting for dispersive acoustic media. Moock VM; Gutiérrez-Reyes EA; García-Segundo C J Biomed Opt; 2018 Jul; 23(7):1-12. PubMed ID: 30027712 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Direct Estimation of Optical Parameters From Photoacoustic Time Series in Quantitative Photoacoustic Tomography. Pulkkinen A; Cox BT; Arridge SR; Goh H; Kaipio JP; Tarvainen T IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2497-2508. PubMed ID: 27323361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Perturbation Monte Carlo Method for Quantitative Photoacoustic Tomography. Leino AA; Lunttila T; Mozumder M; Pulkkinen A; Tarvainen T IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Oct; 39(10):2985-2995. PubMed ID: 32217473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Modeling of Errors Due to Uncertainties in Ultrasound Sensor Locations in Photoacoustic Tomography. Sahlstrom T; Pulkkinen A; Tick J; Leskinen J; Tarvainen T IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 39(6):2140-2150. PubMed ID: 31940525 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A Model-Based Iterative Learning Approach for Diffuse Optical Tomography. Mozumder M; Hauptmann A; Nissila I; Arridge SR; Tarvainen T IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2022 May; 41(5):1289-1299. PubMed ID: 34914584 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Single-stage approach for estimating optical parameters in spectral quantitative photoacoustic tomography. Suhonen M; Pulkkinen A; Tarvainen T J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 2024 Mar; 41(3):527-542. PubMed ID: 38437444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Acoustic Inversion in Optoacoustic Tomography: A Review. Rosenthal A; Ntziachristos V; Razansky D Curr Med Imaging Rev; 2013 Nov; 9(4):318-336. PubMed ID: 24772060 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inverse problems of combined photoacoustic and optical coherence tomography. Elbau P; Mindrinos L; Scherzer O Math Methods Appl Sci; 2017 Feb; 40(3):505-522. PubMed ID: 28133404 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quantitative photoacoustic image reconstruction improves accuracy in deep tissue structures. Mastanduno MA; Gambhir SS Biomed Opt Express; 2016 Oct; 7(10):3811-3825. PubMed ID: 27867695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive photoacoustic computed tomography. Cui M; Zuo H; Wang X; Deng K; Luo J; Ma C Photoacoustics; 2021 Mar; 21():100223. PubMed ID: 33364162 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dimensionality reduced plug and play priors for improving photoacoustic tomographic imaging with limited noisy data. Awasthi N; Kumar Kalva S; Pramanik M; Yalavarthy PK Biomed Opt Express; 2021 Mar; 12(3):1320-1338. PubMed ID: 33796356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT). Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]